155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36840753)
21. [Diagnostic significance of multiparametric MRI combined with US-fusion guided biopsy of the prostate in patients with increased PSA levels and negative standard biopsy results to detect significant prostate cancer - Correlation with the Gleason score. Korrelation mit dem Gleason Score].
Hoffmann MA; Wieler HJ; Jakobs FM; Taymoorian K; Gerhards A; Miederer M; Schreckenberger M
Nuklearmedizin; 2017 Aug; 56(4):147-155. PubMed ID: 28715042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study.
Rakauskas A; Peters M; Martel P; van Rossum PSN; La Rosa S; Meuwly JY; Roth B; Valerio M
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280262. PubMed ID: 36652429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Focal Therapy Eligibility Determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.
Nassiri N; Chang E; Lieu P; Priester AM; Margolis DJA; Huang J; Reiter RE; Dorey FJ; Marks LS; Natarajan S
J Urol; 2018 Feb; 199(2):453-458. PubMed ID: 28830754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Combination of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies is not enough for identifying patients eligible for hemiablative focal therapy for prostate cancer.
Choi YH; Yu JW; Kang MY; Sung HH; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Jeon HG
World J Urol; 2019 Oct; 37(10):2129-2135. PubMed ID: 30603783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An initial negative round of targeted biopsies in men with highly suspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance findings does not exclude clinically significant prostate cancer-Preliminary experience.
Costa DN; Kay FU; Pedrosa I; Kolski L; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Xi Y; Francis F; Rofsky NM
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e15-149.e21. PubMed ID: 27939349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Integration and Diagnostic Accuracy of 3T Nonendorectal coil Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Context of Active Surveillance.
Curci NE; Lane BR; Shankar PR; Noyes SL; Moriarity AK; Kubat A; Brede C; Montgomery JS; Auffenberg GB; Miller DC; Montie JE; George AK; Davenport MS
Urology; 2018 Jun; 116():137-143. PubMed ID: 29653121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy.
Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Marra G; Moschini M; Martini A; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Afferi L; Rakauskas A; Gontero P; Mattei A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 3(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 32847747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Gleason Score within Prostate Abnormal Areas Defined by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Did Not Vary According to the PIRADS Score.
Slaoui H; Neuzillet Y; Ghoneim T; Rouanne M; Abdou A; Lugagne-Delpon PM; Scherrer A; Radulescu C; Delancourt C; Molinié V; Lebret T
Urol Int; 2017; 99(2):156-161. PubMed ID: 28391284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Transcriptome Wide Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy and Matching Surgical Specimens from High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: The Target Must Be Hit.
Radtke JP; Takhar M; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Erho N; du Plessis M; Buerki C; Ong K; Davicioni E; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jul; 4(4):540-546. PubMed ID: 28753844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The use of targeted MR-guided prostate biopsy reduces the risk of Gleason upgrading on radical prostatectomy.
Arsov C; Becker N; Rabenalt R; Hiester A; Quentin M; Dietzel F; Antoch G; Gabbert HE; Albers P; Schimmöller L
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2015 Nov; 141(11):2061-8. PubMed ID: 26013424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. 3T multiparametric MR imaging, PIRADSv2-based detection of index prostate cancer lesions in the transition zone and the peripheral zone using whole mount histopathology as reference standard.
Asvadi NH; Afshari Mirak S; Mohammadian Bajgiran A; Khoshnoodi P; Wibulpolprasert P; Margolis D; Sisk A; Reiter RE; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Nov; 43(11):3117-3124. PubMed ID: 29725743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Findings in 1,123 Men with Preoperative
Raveenthiran S; Yaxley WJ; Franklin T; Coughlin G; Roberts M; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Wong D; McEwan L; Brown N; Parkinson R; Esler R; Yaxley JW
J Urol; 2022 Mar; 207(3):573-580. PubMed ID: 34694140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 improve accuracy in reporting anterior lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)?
Hoffmann R; Logan C; O'Callaghan M; Gormly K; Chan K; Foreman D
Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Jan; 50(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 29188489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pathological and 3 Tesla Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation with Whole Mount Histopathology.
Tan N; Shen L; Khoshnoodi P; Alcalá HE; Yu W; Hsu W; Reiter RE; Lu DY; Raman SS
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1218-1223. PubMed ID: 29128577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Histological findings of totally embedded robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) specimens in 1197 men with a negative (low risk) preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) prostate lobe and clinical implications.
Yaxley WJ; Nouhaud FX; Raveenthiran S; Franklin A; Donato P; Coughlin G; Kua B; Gianduzzo T; Wong D; Parkinson R; Brown N; Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Roberts M; Yaxley JW
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Jun; 24(2):398-405. PubMed ID: 32999464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prospective analysis of clinically significant prostate cancer detection with [
Bodar YJL; Zwezerijnen BGJC; van der Voorn PJ; Jansen BHE; Smit RS; Kol SQ; Meijer D; de Bie K; Yaqub M; Windhorst BAD; Hendrikse HNH; Vis AN; Oprea-Lager DE
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Apr; 49(5):1731-1742. PubMed ID: 34725727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Detection of Individual Prostate Cancer Foci via Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Johnson DC; Raman SS; Mirak SA; Kwan L; Bajgiran AM; Hsu W; Maehara CK; Ahuja P; Faiena I; Pooli A; Salmasi A; Sisk A; Felker ER; Lu DSK; Reiter RE
Eur Urol; 2019 May; 75(5):712-720. PubMed ID: 30509763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate underestimates tumour volume of small visible lesions.
Sorce G; Stabile A; Lucianò R; Motterle G; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Pellegrino F; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Jeffrey Karnes R; Guccini I; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2022 Feb; 129(2):201-207. PubMed ID: 34038039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
