161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36840767)
1. Surgical outcomes in patients aged 70 years and older following uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparative study.
Chill HH; Dick A; Cohen A; Ryvkin I; Rosenbloom JI; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 307(6):2033-2040. PubMed ID: 36840767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Absorbable versus Permanent Suture for Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse.
Chill HH; Cohen-Milun G; Cohen A; Moss NP; Winer JD; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):784-790. PubMed ID: 35283321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Infected pelvic hematoma following vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of apical prolapse.
Chill HH; Ben Porat L; Winer J; Moss NP; Cohen A; Shveiky D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Apr; 271():97-101. PubMed ID: 35180514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association between adjuvant posterior repair and success of native tissue apical suspension.
Sutkin G; Zyczynski HM; Sridhar A; Jelovsek JE; Rardin CR; Mazloomdoost D; Rahn DD; Nguyen JN; Andy UU; Meyer I; Gantz MG;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):161.e1-161.e8. PubMed ID: 31449806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vaginal Colposuspension Using the Uphold Lite Mesh System versus Transvaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse: A Comparative Study.
Chill HH; Navon I; Reuveni-Salzman A; Cohen A; Dick A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):1759-1764. PubMed ID: 33713835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimated levator ani subtended volume: a novel assay for predicting surgical failure after uterosacral ligament suspension.
Wyman AM; Rodrigues AA; Hahn L; Greene KA; Bassaly R; Hart S; Miladinovic B; Hoyte L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):611.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26596232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Shah NM; Berger AA; Zhuang Z; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):306.e1-306.e16. PubMed ID: 35654112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
Lavelle ES; Giugale LE; Winger DG; Wang L; Carter-Brooks CM; Shepherd JP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of Transvaginal High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension: Over 500-Patient Single-Center Study.
Milani R; Frigerio M; Cola A; Beretta C; Spelzini F; Manodoro S
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(3):203-206. PubMed ID: 29697546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
Schulten SF; Detollenaere RJ; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Van Eijndhoven HW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Retrospective Cohort of Absorbable and Permanent Suture Groups.
Bradley MS; Bickhaus JA; Amundsen CL; Newcomb LK; Truong T; Weidner AC; Siddiqui NY
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(3):207-212. PubMed ID: 28657988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension: An alternative to McCall culdoplasty in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Novara L; Sgro LG; Pecchio S; Ottino L; Tomatis V; Biglia N
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():278-281. PubMed ID: 31351324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension versus vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite™ mesh system: clinical outcome and patient satisfaction.
Chill HH; Gutman-Ido E; Navon I; Reuveni-Salzman A; Haj-Yahya R; Shveiky D
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1513-1518. PubMed ID: 33084960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anatomical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction After Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy for Anterior and Apical Prolapse.
Haj Yahya R; Chill HH; Herzberg S; Asfour A; Lesser S; Shveiky D
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(5):352-355. PubMed ID: 28658003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anterior repair versus no anterior repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse resolved under simulated apical support at the time of uterosacral ligament suspension.
Lee SY; Jeon MJ
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2043-2049. PubMed ID: 32047967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S;
JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
