BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36840767)

  • 21. Native-tissue prolapse repair: Efficacy and adverse effects of uterosacral ligaments suspension at 10-year follow up.
    Cola A; Marino G; Milani R; Barba M; Volontè S; Spelzini F; Manodoro S; Frigerio M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 35044675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outcomes of Transvaginal High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension: Over 500-Patient Single-Center Study.
    Milani R; Frigerio M; Cola A; Beretta C; Spelzini F; Manodoro S
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 28230565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Effectiveness of vaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse].
    Shen WJ; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Duan L; Zhang YH; Niu K; Wang WY; Qin L; Zhang XL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 54(4):232-238. PubMed ID: 31006188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Long term surgical outcomes of vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite™ mesh system vs. vaginal vault uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of apical prolapse.
    Lozo S; Chill HH; Botros C; Goldberg RP; Gafni-Kane A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Jan; 280():150-153. PubMed ID: 36493584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture in Apical Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Pollack BL; Popiel P; Toaff MC; Drugge E; Bielawski A; Sacks A; Bibi M; Friedman-Ciment R; LeBron K; Alishahian L; Phillips D; Rubino SR; Pollack S; Khan RS; Khan ES; Pape DM; Grimes CL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 141(2):268-283. PubMed ID: 36649334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vaginal intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament vault suspensions: a comparison of a standard and novel approach.
    Mounir D; Vasquez-Tran NO; Lindo FM; Antosh DD; Muir TW
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):913-918. PubMed ID: 32757022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Subjective and Objective Outcomes of Robotic and Vaginal High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
    Vallabh-Patel V; Saiz C; Salamon C
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(6):420-424. PubMed ID: 27465813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
    JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recurrent apical prolapse after high uterosacral ligament suspension - in a heterogenous cohort characterised by a high prevalence of previous pelvic operations.
    Pedersen KD; Storkholm MH; Bek KM; Glavind-Kristensen M; Greisen S
    BMC Womens Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):96. PubMed ID: 31299946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Posterior repair versus no posterior repair for posterior vaginal wall prolapse resolved under simulated apical support at the time of native tissue apical suspension.
    Oh S; Choi S; Lee SY; Jeon MJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2203-2209. PubMed ID: 33635351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Apical pelvic organ prolapse repair via vaginal-assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: Initial experience from a tertiary care hospital.
    Alay I; Kaya C; Cengiz H; Yildiz S; Aslan O; Yasar L; Ekin M
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2021 Jul; 14(3):346-352. PubMed ID: 32967055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy versus hysterectomy plus uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched cohort study.
    Milani R; Manodoro S; Cola A; Bellante N; Palmieri S; Frigerio M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1867-1872. PubMed ID: 31848662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of two natural tissue repair-based surgical techniques; sacrospinous fixation and uterosacral ligament suspension for pelvic organ prolapse treatment.
    Topdagi Yilmaz EP; Yapca OE; Topdagi YE; Atakan Al R; Kumtepe Y
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 50(4):101905. PubMed ID: 32916370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Association of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification examination D point with uterosacral ligament suspension outcomes: the "OPTIMAL" D point.
    Richter LA; Bradley SE; Desale S; Richter HE; Park AJ; Iglesia CB
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2179-2184. PubMed ID: 33710427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Technique of extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension for apical suspension.
    Ow LL; Walsh CE; Rajamaheswari N; Dwyer PL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Apr; 27(4):637-9. PubMed ID: 26612207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quality of life recovery after laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension: a single centre observational study.
    Panico G; Vacca L; Campagna G; Lombisani A; Caramazza D; Caporale N; Scambia G; Ercoli A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 May; 260():212-217. PubMed ID: 33862432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
    Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Association Between Enlarged Genital Hiatus and Composite Surgical Failure After Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
    Bradley MS; Sridhar A; Ferrante K; Andy UU; Visco AG; Florian-Rodriguez ME; Myers D; Varner E; Mazloomdoost D; Gantz MG;
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 May; 29(5):479-488. PubMed ID: 36701331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recurrence of vaginal prolapse after total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: comparison between normal-weight and overweight women.
    Rappa C; Saccone G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):601.e1-601.e4. PubMed ID: 27342042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.