161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36840767)
41. Native Tissue Prolapse Repairs: Comparative Effectiveness Trials.
Siff LN; Barber MD
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2016 Mar; 43(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 26880509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Association Between Enlarged Genital Hiatus and Composite Surgical Failure After Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
Bradley MS; Sridhar A; Ferrante K; Andy UU; Visco AG; Florian-Rodriguez ME; Myers D; Varner E; Mazloomdoost D; Gantz MG;
Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 May; 29(5):479-488. PubMed ID: 36701331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Concomitant Anterior Repair, Preoperative Prolapse Severity, and Anatomic Prolapse Outcomes After Vaginal Apical Procedures.
Nager CW; Grimes CL; Nolen TL; Wai CY; Brubaker L; Jeppson PC; Wilson TS; Visco AG; Barber MD; Sutkin G; Norton P; Rardin CR; Arya L; Wallace D; Meikle SF;
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29232267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension combined with cervical amputation in treatment of women severe uterine prolapsed at child-bearing period].
Sun Z; Zhu L; Hu H; Lang J; Shi H; Gong X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 49(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 24820298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Smith BC; Crisp CC; Kleeman SD; Yook E; Pauls RN
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):93-98. PubMed ID: 30807407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Outcomes of Manchester procedure combined with high uterosacral ligament suspension for uterine prolapse.
Wang Q; Wu N; Li Y; Lin C; Xu Y; Chen X
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Apr; 49(4):1273-1282. PubMed ID: 36734101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Abdominal and vaginal pelvic support with concomitant hysterectomy for uterovaginal pelvic prolapse: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alfahmy A; Mahran A; Conroy B; Brewka RR; Ibrahim M; Sheyn D; El-Nashar SA; Hijaz A
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2021-2031. PubMed ID: 34050771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy and Apical Suspension of the Vaginal Cuff to the Uterosacral Ligament.
Lowenstein L; Baekelandt J; Paz Y; Lauterbach R; Matanes E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1015. PubMed ID: 30980991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. High uterosacral vault suspension vs Sacrocolpopexy for treating apical defects: a randomized controlled trial with twelve months follow-up.
Rondini C; Braun H; Alvarez J; Urzúa MJ; Villegas R; Wenzel C; Descouvieres C
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1131-8. PubMed ID: 25910610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
Chapman GC; Slopnick EA; Roberts K; Sheyn D; Wherley S; Mahajan ST; Pollard RR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Long-term outcomes of the high vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension in treatment of the severe pelvic organ prolapse].
Lu YX; Wang J; Shen WJ; Zhang YH; Liu JX; Zhao Y; Ge J; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 24199919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse repair.
Milani R; Frigerio M; Spelzini F; Manodoro S
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1421-1423. PubMed ID: 28188468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Surgical repair of vaginal vault prolapse; a comparison between ipsilateral uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation-a nationwide cohort study.
Husby KR; Larsen MD; Lose G; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 32897459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vermeulen CKM; Schuurman B; Coolen AWM; Meijs-Hermanns PR; van Leijsen SAL; Veen J; Bongers MY
BJOG; 2023 Dec; 130(13):1568-1578. PubMed ID: 37271736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [UTEROSACRAL VERSUS SACROSPINOUS LIGAMENT FIXATION FOLLOWING VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE].
Nasser-Saman D; Yonis G; Haya N; Lavie O; Abramov Y
Harefuah; 2022 Jun; 161(6):342-348. PubMed ID: 35734789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Do Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination Ba and D Guide the Selection of Operation for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse?
Li C; Shu H; Dai Z
J Invest Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(5):438-445. PubMed ID: 30574821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of laparoscopic techniques for apical organ prolapse repair - a systematic review of the literature.
Szymczak P; Grzybowska ME; Wydra DG
Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Nov; 38(8):2031-2050. PubMed ID: 31452267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
