These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36840767)

  • 81. Suture Complication Rates and Surgical Outcomes According to the Nonabsorbable Suture Materials Used in Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: Polyester versus Polypropylene.
    Lee J; Oh S; Jeon MJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 28(8):1503-1507. PubMed ID: 33310165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Anterior bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation with concomitant anterior native tissue repair: a pilot study.
    Delacroix C; Allegre L; Chatziioannidou K; Gérard A; Fatton B; de Tayrac R
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Dec; 33(12):3519-3527. PubMed ID: 35226145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Long-term outcomes and predictors of failure after surgery for stage IV apical pelvic organ prolapse.
    Linder BJ; El-Nashar SA; Mukwege AA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Rhodes DJ; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ; Occhino JA; Trabuco EC
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):803-810. PubMed ID: 28921036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Apical suspension is underutilized for repair of stage IV pelvic organ prolapse: an analysis of national practice patterns in the United States.
    Slopnick EA; Chapman GC; Roberts K; Sheyn DD; El-Nashar S; Mahajan ST
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):791-797. PubMed ID: 32507910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Recurrence and Patient-Centered Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Abdominal Uterosacral Ligament and Mesh-Augmented Sacrohysteropexy.
    Davidson ERW; Casas-Puig V; Paraiso MFR; Ridgeway B; Ferrando CA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 26(12):763-768. PubMed ID: 30845072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Medium-term outcomes after combined trachelectomy and uterosacral ligament suspension among young women with severe uterine prolapse.
    Sun Z; Zhu L; Hu H; Lang J; Shi H; Gong X
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Feb; 132(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 26613824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
    Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Vaginal prolapse recurrence after uterosacral ligament suspension in normal-weight compared with overweight and obese women.
    Edenfield AL; Amundsen CL; Weidner AC; Wu JM; George A; Siddiqui NY
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 121(3):554-559. PubMed ID: 23635618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Complications After Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Versus Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation at Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Stairs J; Jain M; Chen I; Clancy A
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2022 Dec; 28(12):834-841. PubMed ID: 36409640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Uterosacral vault suspension (USLS) at the time of hysterectomy: laparoscopic versus vaginal approach.
    Houlihan S; Kim-Fine S; Birch C; Tang S; Brennand EA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):611-621. PubMed ID: 30393822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Back to the future: vaginal hysterectomy and Campbell uterosacral ligaments suspension for urogenital prolapse.
    Pettenati C; Cour F; Bosset PO; Kennel T; Vidart A; Lebret T
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1579-1587. PubMed ID: 33620535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Risk factors for ureteral occlusion during transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Jackson E; Bilbao JA; Vera RW; Mulla ZD; Mallett VT; Montoya TI
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1809-14. PubMed ID: 26174656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Extraperitoneal Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy: A Novel Treatment for Apical Compartment Prolapse.
    Ossin D; Ramirez-Caban L; Hurtado E
    Urology; 2020 Jun; 140():181-182. PubMed ID: 32173380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Anatomic outcomes of vaginal mesh procedure (Prolift) compared with uterosacral ligament suspension and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a Fellows' Pelvic Research Network study.
    Sanses TV; Shahryarinejad A; Molden S; Hoskey KA; Abbasy S; Patterson D; Saks EK; Weber LeBrun EE; Gamble TL; King VG; Nguyen AL; Abed H; Young SB;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 201(5):519.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19716533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Laparoscopic duplication of the uterosacral ligaments following hysterectomy for stage III-IV apical pelvic organ prolapse.
    Serati M; Laganà AS; Casarin J; Gisone B; Cantaluppi S; Ghezzi F
    Updates Surg; 2020 Mar; 72(1):199-204. PubMed ID: 31691118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Outcomes of native tissue transvaginal apical approaches in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.
    Meyer I; Whitworth RE; Lukacz ES; Smith AL; Sung VW; Visco AG; Ackenbom MF; Wai CY; Mazloomdoost D; Gantz MG; Richter HE;
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2155-2164. PubMed ID: 32146521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women.
    Manonai J; Wattanayingcharoenchai R
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Jan; 35(1):82-4. PubMed ID: 25029097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Outcomes of the anterior approach versus posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Bastani P; Tayebi S; Ghabousian A; Salehi-Pourmehr H; Hajebrahimi S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1857-1862. PubMed ID: 35347369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. The effect of uterine volume on surgical outcomes following uterine preserving apical prolapse repair.
    Chill HH; Cohen A; Dick A; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Feb; 281():49-53. PubMed ID: 36535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. A novel transvaginal approach to correct recurrent apical prolapse after failed sacral colpopexy: case series.
    Bracken JN; Tran DH; Kuehl TJ; Larsen W; Yandell PM; Shull BL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1429-33. PubMed ID: 22527557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.