BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3684085)

  • 1. Documentation evaluation system: streamlining quality of care and personnel evaluations.
    Nadzam DM
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Nov; 18(11):38-42. PubMed ID: 3684085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review--why and how to do it.
    Jackson SA
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):60-86. PubMed ID: 2640603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Making peer review work in the emergency setting: the Johns Hopkins Hospital experience.
    Hoelz JJ; Pieterick CL
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 2640605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring and validating a nurse's caring performance.
    Smith LS
    Adv Clin Care; 1990; 5(3):14-6. PubMed ID: 2328068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing a primary nursing performance appraisal tool.
    Beck S
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):36-8, 42. PubMed ID: 2294492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance evaluations.
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):vii-xvi, 1-160. PubMed ID: 2640597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance skill evaluations for i.v. nurses.
    Czapracki DM
    J Intraven Nurs; 1989; 12(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 2723873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Everybody still owns it: the peer-based chart audit, revisited.
    Dick T; Craig B
    JEMS; 1990 Aug; 15(8):44-6. PubMed ID: 10105761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Choosing a performance appraisal system.
    Grose LG
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):38-46. PubMed ID: 2640601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward a comprehensive personnel system: performance appraisal--Part IV.
    Nauright L
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Aug; 18(8):67-70, 75-7. PubMed ID: 3649657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Criterion referenced performance appraisal system: a blueprint.
    Sudela KD; Landureth L
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Mar; 18(3):54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 3645448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the performance of nurses: a multidimensional approach.
    Schwirian PM
    Nurs Res; 1978; 27(6):347-51. PubMed ID: 251246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost accountability and clinical nurse specialist evaluation.
    Tierney MJ; Grant LM; Mazique SI
    Nurs Manage; 1990 May; 21(5):26-8, 30-1. PubMed ID: 2110640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of charge nurses].
    Nowomińska A
    Pieleg Polozna; 1984; 9():9-10, 33. PubMed ID: 6570258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The evaluation-notation].
    Mizrahi MR
    Soins Gynecol Obstet Pueric Pediatr; 1990; (109-110):30-6. PubMed ID: 2389233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Criterion Referenced Performance Appraisal System can add to the effectiveness of the hospital and...improve quality of care.
    Berger L; Clipp FP
    South Hosp; 1982; 50(4):9-12. PubMed ID: 10256842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Worker assessment in practice].
    Ksykiewicz-Dorota A; Drygała M
    Pieleg Polozna; 1983; (7):12-4, 22. PubMed ID: 6557572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using performance appraisal to shape the nursing division.
    Hutelmyer CM
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 2640606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increasing productivity through performance evaluation.
    Lachman VD
    J Nurs Adm; 1984 Dec; 14(12):7-14. PubMed ID: 6568265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluating performance to guarantee a high standard].
    Pins JA; Hardie CG
    Rev Enferm; 1987 Dec; 10(112 Suppl):4-7. PubMed ID: 3438684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.