BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3684085)

  • 21. Time documentation of clinical nurse specialist activities.
    Robichaud AM; Hamric AB
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Jan; 16(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 3632805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The performance review approach to improving productivity.
    Woods JG; Dillion T
    Personnel; 1985 Mar; 62(3):20-7. PubMed ID: 10270456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The manager's challenge.
    Alexander GR
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):3-6. PubMed ID: 2640600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Personnel evaluation in nursing].
    Sotomayor A
    Bol Col Prof Enferm P R; 1983 Jun; 9(34):9-13. PubMed ID: 6590066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The objectives of performance appraisal--or "where can we go from here"?
    Lawler TG
    Nurs Manage; 1988 Mar; 19(3):82-4, 86, 88. PubMed ID: 3347409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Developing the performance appraisal system.
    Pelle D; Greenhalgh L
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Dec; 18(12):37-40, 42, 44. PubMed ID: 3696616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Systematic faculty evaluation: a growing critical concern.
    Bobbitt KC
    J Nurs Educ; 1985 Feb; 24(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 2984376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multiple rater performance appraisals: solutions for hospital personnel.
    Boissoneau RA; Edwards MR
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1985; 30(2):54-66. PubMed ID: 10270712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Assessment of the work efficiency of nurses].
    Vedenko BG; Sushchik LP; Vedenko LB
    Med Sestra; 1985 Sep; 44(9):24-6. PubMed ID: 3853062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Productivity measurement for clinical nurse specialists.
    Anderson EL; McCartney ES; Schreiber JA; Thompson EA
    Clin Nurse Spec; 1989; 3(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 2736465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluating personnel with automated management systems.
    Brady M
    Nurs Manage; 1988 Jul; 19(7):38-9. PubMed ID: 3386954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The application of assessment techniques.
    Fink CA
    Nurs Manage; 1988 May; 19(5):66-8. PubMed ID: 3368150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Understanding, evaluating and improving nursing productivity.
    Williamson WJ; Johnston J
    Nurs Manage; 1988 May; 19(5):49-50, 52, 54. PubMed ID: 3368148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating supplemental professional nurses.
    Metzger NJ
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):54-5, 58-9, 62. PubMed ID: 2294495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The design and implementation of task oriented employee evaluations.
    Hanna KJ; Sobecki DF
    Hosp Pharm; 1984 Jun; 19(6):405-8, 411-3. PubMed ID: 10266567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Work evaluations: are they effective?
    Loraine K
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Apr; 13(4):44-6. PubMed ID: 6922444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A productivity triangle: three steps to good employee performance.
    Ryder JD
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1985 Aug; 7(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 10272338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Performance appraisal is not enough.
    Council JD; Plachy RJ
    J Nurs Adm; 1980 Oct; 10(10):20-6. PubMed ID: 6903581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Counseling and performance appraisal: a planning perspective.
    Day CM
    Am J Med Technol; 1983 Jun; 49(6):415-9. PubMed ID: 6881193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Employee evaluations. Shifting the emphasis.
    McConnell CR
    AORN J; 1986 Dec; 44(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 3641628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.