187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36841643)
1. Improved clinical outcomes associated with the Impella 5.5 compared to the Impella 5.0 in contemporary cardiogenic shock and heart failure patients.
Ramzy D; Soltesz EG; Silvestry S; Daneshmand M; Kanwar M; D'Alessandro DA
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2023 May; 42(5):553-557. PubMed ID: 36841643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early Outcomes of the First 200 US Patients Treated with Impella 5.5: A Novel Temporary Left Ventricular Assist Device.
Ramzy D; Anderson M; Batsides G; Ono M; Silvestry S; D'Alessandro DA; Funamoto M; Zias EA; Lemaire A; Soltese E
Innovations (Phila); 2021; 16(4):365-372. PubMed ID: 34101514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of mechanical circulatory support for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Kim Y; Shapero K; Ahn SS; Goldsweig AM; Desai N; Altin SE
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):658-663. PubMed ID: 34156755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long term survival after early unloading with Impella CP
Loehn T; O'Neill WW; Lange B; Pfluecke C; Schweigler T; Mierke J; Waessnig N; Mahlmann A; Youssef A; Speiser U; Strasser RH; Ibrahim K
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):149-157. PubMed ID: 30456984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO.
Karami M; den Uil CA; Ouweneel DM; Scholte NT; Engström AE; Akin S; Lagrand WK; Vlaar AP; Jewbali LS; Henriques JP
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):164-172. PubMed ID: 31353918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impella Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis.
Moustafa A; Khan MS; Saad M; Siddiqui S; Eltahawy E
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jan; 34():25-31. PubMed ID: 33549497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 device for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a three-center experience.
Engström AE; Granfeldt H; Seybold-Epting W; Dahm M; Cocchieri R; Driessen AH; Sjauw KD; Vis MM; Baan J; Koch KT; De Jong M; Lagrand WK; Van Der Sloot JA; Tijssen JG; De Winter RJ; De Mol BA; Piek JJ; Henriques JP
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2013 Oct; 61(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 24096248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of outcomes for 15,259 US patients with acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (AMICS) supported with the Impella device.
O'Neill WW; Grines C; Schreiber T; Moses J; Maini B; Dixon SR; Ohman EM
Am Heart J; 2018 Aug; 202():33-38. PubMed ID: 29803984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of different mechanical circulatory support devices and their timing of implantation on myocardial damage and mid-term recovery in acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock.
Pieri M; Sorrentino T; Oppizzi M; Melisurgo G; Lembo R; Colombo A; Zangrillo A; Pappalardo F
J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 30460719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
Helgestad OKL; Josiassen J; Hassager C; Jensen LO; Holmvang L; Udesen NLJ; Schmidt H; Berg Ravn H; Moller JE
Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Timing of impella placement in PCI for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: An updated meta-analysis.
Iannaccone M; Franchin L; Hanson ID; Boccuzzi G; Basir MB; Truesdell AG; O'Neill W
Int J Cardiol; 2022 Sep; 362():47-54. PubMed ID: 35533755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management and outcome of patients supported with Impella 5.0 for refractory cardiogenic shock.
Gaudard P; Mourad M; Eliet J; Zeroual N; Culas G; Rouvière P; Albat B; Colson P
Crit Care; 2015 Oct; 19():363. PubMed ID: 26453047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome of the impella device for acute mechanical circulatory support.
Lemaire A; Anderson MB; Prendergast T; Stockmaster N; Goodman A; Lozane AM; Batsides G
Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 23571788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcomes among cardiogenic shock patients supported with high-capacity Impella axial flow pumps: A report from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group.
Fried J; Farr M; Kanwar M; Uriel N; Hernandez-Montfort J; Blumer V; Li S; Sinha SS; Garan AR; Li B; Hall S; Hickey GW; Mahr C; Nathan S; Schwartzman A; Kim J; Ton VK; Vishnevsky OA; Vorovich E; Abraham J; Zweck E; Guglin M; Vallabhajosyula S; Kataria R; Walec KD; Zazzali P; Kong Q; Sangal P; Burkhoff D; Kapur NK
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38834162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 and the Impella Left Direct pumps for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock at La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital.
David CH; Quessard A; Mastroianni C; Hekimian G; Amour J; Leprince P; Lebreton G
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jan; 57(1):183-188. PubMed ID: 31270535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Schrage B; Ibrahim K; Loehn T; Werner N; Sinning JM; Pappalardo F; Pieri M; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Westenfeld R; Horn P; Pauschinger M; Eckner D; Twerenbold R; Nordbeck P; Salinger T; Abel P; Empen K; Busch MC; Felix SB; Sieweke JT; Møller JE; Pareek N; Hill J; MacCarthy P; Bergmann MW; Henriques JPS; Möbius-Winkler S; Schulze PC; Ouarrak T; Zeymer U; Schneider S; Blankenberg S; Thiele H; Schäfer A; Westermann D
Circulation; 2019 Mar; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structured Weaning From the Impella Left Ventricular Micro-Axial Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock and Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Experience From a Non-Cardiac Surgical Centre.
Slack RJ; McGain F; Cox N; French C; Cheng V; Stub D; Zakhem B; Dade F; Bloom JE; Chan W; Yang Y
Heart Lung Circ; 2024 Apr; 33(4):460-469. PubMed ID: 38388259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short-term mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 device for cardiogenic shock at La Pitié-Salpêtrière.
Mastroianni C; Bouabdallaoui N; Leprince P; Lebreton G
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2017 Feb; 6(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 26873912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Short-term mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to durable left ventricular assist device implantation in refractory cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
den Uil CA; Akin S; Jewbali LS; Dos Reis Miranda D; Brugts JJ; Constantinescu AA; Kappetein AP; Caliskan K
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Jul; 52(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 28472406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
