123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36841743)
1. Image Quality of Lumbar Spine Imaging at 0.55T Low-Field MRI is Comparable to Conventional 1.5T MRI - Initial Observations in Healthy Volunteers.
Breit HC; Vosshenrich J; Hofmann V; Rusche T; Kovacs BK; Bach M; Manneck S; Harder D
Acad Radiol; 2023 Nov; 30(11):2440-2446. PubMed ID: 36841743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing Metal Artifact Severity and Ability to Assess Near-Metal Anatomy Between 0.55 T and 1.5 T MRI in Patients with Metallic Spinal Implants-A Scanner Comparison Study.
Seifert AC; Breit HC; Schlicht F; Donners R; Harder D; Jan V
Acad Radiol; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38242732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advanced deep learning-based image reconstruction in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T - Effects on image quality and acquisition time in comparison to conventional deep learning-based reconstruction.
Schlicht F; Vosshenrich J; Donners R; Seifert AC; Fenchel M; Nickel D; Obmann M; Harder D; Breit HC
Eur J Radiol Open; 2024 Jun; 12():100567. PubMed ID: 38711678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Image Quality of a Low-Field (0.55T) Knee MRI Protocol Using Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Compared with a Standard (1.5T) Knee MRI Protocol.
Lopez Schmidt I; Haag N; Shahzadi I; Frohwein LJ; Schneider C; Niehoff JH; Kroeger JR; Borggrefe J; Moenninghoff C
J Clin Med; 2023 Feb; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 36902704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. More Space, Less Noise-New-generation Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Systems Can Improve Patient Comfort: A Prospective 0.55T-1.5T-Scanner Comparison.
Rusche T; Vosshenrich J; Winkel DJ; Donners R; Segeroth M; Bach M; Merkle EM; Breit HC
J Clin Med; 2022 Nov; 11(22):. PubMed ID: 36431182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of image quality and diagnostic efficacy of routine clinical lumbar spine imaging at 0.55T and 1.5/3T.
Lavrova A; Seiberlich N; Kelsey L; Richardson J; Comer J; Masotti M; Itriago-Leon P; Wright K; Mishra S
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jun; 175():111406. PubMed ID: 38490129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abdominal MRI on a Commercial 0.55T System: Initial Evaluation and Comparison to Higher Field Strengths.
Ramachandran A; Hussain HK; Gulani V; Kelsey L; Mendiratta-Lala M; Richardson J; Masotti M; Dudek N; Morehouse J; Panagis KR; Wright K; Seiberlich N
Acad Radiol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38320946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential of Stroke Imaging Using a New Prototype of Low-Field MRI: A Prospective Direct 0.55 T/1.5 T Scanner Comparison.
Rusche T; Breit HC; Bach M; Wasserthal J; Gehweiler J; Manneck S; Lieb JM; De Marchis GM; Psychogios MN; Sporns PB
J Clin Med; 2022 May; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 35628923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of 12-lead electrocardiogram at 0.55T for improved cardiac monitoring in magnetic resonance imaging.
Kolandaivelu A; Bruce CG; Seemann F; Yildirim DK; Campbell-Washburn AE; Lederman RJ; Herzka DA
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2024 Summer; 26(1):101009. PubMed ID: 38342406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [New clinical applications for low-field magnetic resonance imaging : Technical and physical aspects].
Breit HC; Vosshenrich J; Bach M; Merkle EM
Radiologe; 2022 May; 62(5):394-399. PubMed ID: 35191997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance imaging applications at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparative study.
Schmidt GP; Wintersperger B; Graser A; Baur-Melnyk A; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):449-59. PubMed ID: 17507818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Modern mid-field magnetic resonance imaging in private practice : Field report].
Wujciak D
Radiologe; 2022 May; 62(5):405-409. PubMed ID: 35482042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of diagnostic value and T2-weighted three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (3D-SPACE) image quality in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (2D-TSE) sequences in lumbar spine MR imaging.
Hossein J; Fariborz F; Mehrnaz R; Babak R
Eur J Radiol Open; 2019; 6():36-41. PubMed ID: 30619918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accelerated MRI of the Lumbar Spine Using Compressed Sensing: Quality and Efficiency.
Bratke G; Rau R; Weiss K; Kabbasch C; Sircar K; Morelli JN; Persigehl T; Maintz D; Giese D; Haneder S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e164-e175. PubMed ID: 30267462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deep Learning Model for Automated Detection and Classification of Central Canal, Lateral Recess, and Neural Foraminal Stenosis at Lumbar Spine MRI.
Hallinan JTPD; Zhu L; Yang K; Makmur A; Algazwi DAR; Thian YL; Lau S; Choo YS; Eide SE; Yap QV; Chan YH; Tan JH; Kumar N; Ooi BC; Yoshioka H; Quek ST
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):130-138. PubMed ID: 33973835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Initial experience with a next-generation low-field MRI scanner: Potential for breast imaging?
Dietzel M; Laun FB; Heiß R; Wenkel E; Bickelhaupt S; Hack C; Uder M; Ohlmeyer S
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Apr; 173():111352. PubMed ID: 38330534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Economic aspects of low-field magnetic resonance imaging : Acquisition, installation, and maintenance costs of 0.55 T systems].
Vosshenrich J; Breit HC; Bach M; Merkle EM
Radiologe; 2022 May; 62(5):400-404. PubMed ID: 35348808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interrater and intrarater agreements of magnetic resonance imaging findings in the lumbar spine: significant variability across degenerative conditions.
Fu MC; Buerba RA; Long WD; Blizzard DJ; Lischuk AW; Haims AH; Grauer JN
Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2442-8. PubMed ID: 24642053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Compressed Sensing (ACS) and Routine Two-Dimensional Sequences on Lumbar Spine Imaging.
Sui H; Gong Y; Liu L; Lv Z; Zhang Y; Dai Y; Mo Z
J Pain Res; 2023; 16():257-267. PubMed ID: 36744117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simultaneous Multislice-Based 5-Minute Lumbar Spine MRI Protocol: Initial Experience in a Clinical Setting.
Longo MG; Fagundes J; Huang S; Mehan W; Witzel T; Bhat H; Heberlein K; Rosen BR; Rosenthal D; Gonzalez RG; Schaefer PW; Rapalino O
J Neuroimaging; 2017 Sep; 27(5):442-446. PubMed ID: 28574665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
