132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36842260)
1. An effective and optimized patient-specific QA workload reduction for VMAT plans after MLC-modelling optimization.
Marsac T; Camejo AB; Chiavassa S; Jan S; Lorand H; Moignier A
Phys Med; 2023 Mar; 107():102548. PubMed ID: 36842260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic MLC-based plans: A study of plan complexity.
Masi L; Hernandez V; Saez J; Doro R; Livi L
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):942-952. PubMed ID: 33332628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A TPS integrated machine learning tool for predicting patient-specific quality assurance outcomes in volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Noblet C; Maunet M; Duthy M; Coste F; Moreau M
Phys Med; 2024 Feb; 118():103208. PubMed ID: 38211462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient-specific quality assurance prediction models based on machine learning for novel dual-layered MLC linac.
Zhu H; Zhu Q; Wang Z; Yang B; Zhang W; Qiu J
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 36342293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient-specific quality assurance failure prediction with deep tabular models.
Levin R; Aravkin AY; Kim M
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 May; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 37141866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative assessment of helical tomotherapy plans complexity.
Cavinato S; Fusella M; Paiusco M; Scaggion A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jan; 24(1):e13781. PubMed ID: 36523156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT.
Agnew CE; Irvine DM; McGarry CK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):4994. PubMed ID: 25493524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacious patient-specific QA for Vertebra SBRT using a high-resolution detector array SRS MapCHECK: AAPM TG-218 analysis.
Berk K; Kron T; Hardcastle N; Yeo AU
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 25(6):e14276. PubMed ID: 38414322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A structured FMEA approach to optimizing combinations of plan-specific quality assurance techniques for IMRT and VMAT QA.
O'Daniel JC; Giles W; Cui Y; Adamson J
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5387-5397. PubMed ID: 37475493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A radiotherapy community data-driven approach to determine which complexity metrics best predict the impact of atypical TPS beam modeling on clinical dose calculation accuracy.
Brooks FMD; Glenn MC; Hernandez V; Saez J; Mehrens H; Pollard-Larkin JM; Howell RM; Peterson CB; Nelson CL; Clark CH; Kry SF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 May; 25(5):e14318. PubMed ID: 38427776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficient dose-volume histogram-based pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance methodology with combined deep learning and machine learning models for volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy.
Gong C; Zhu K; Lin C; Han C; Lu Z; Chen Y; Yu C; Hou L; Zhou Y; Yi J; Ai Y; Xiang X; Xie C; Jin X
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7779-7790. PubMed ID: 36190117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective Clinical Validation of Virtual Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Radiation Therapy Plans.
Wall PDH; Hirata E; Morin O; Valdes G; Witztum A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2022 Aug; 113(5):1091-1102. PubMed ID: 35533908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reduction of patient specific quality assurance through plan complexity metrics for VMAT plans with an open-source TPS script.
Uher K; Ehrbar S; Tanadini-Lang S; Dal Bello R
Z Med Phys; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 37001999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is it necessary to perform measurement-based patient-specific quality assurance for online adaptive radiotherapy with Elekta Unity MR-Linac?
Xu Y; Xia W; Ren W; Ma M; Men K; Dai J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 25(2):e14175. PubMed ID: 37817407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance prediction based on 1D complexity metrics and 3D planning dose: classification, gamma passing rates, and DVH metrics.
Chen L; Luo H; Li S; Tan X; Feng B; Yang X; Wang Y; Jin F
Radiat Oncol; 2023 Nov; 18(1):192. PubMed ID: 37986008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determining the optimal dosimetric leaf gap setting for rounded leaf-end multileaf collimator systems by simple test fields.
Yao W; Farr JB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):65-77. PubMed ID: 26218999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multi-task autoencoder based classification-regression model for patient-specific VMAT QA.
Wang L; Li J; Zhang S; Zhang X; Zhang Q; Chan MF; Yang R; Sui J
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(23):235023. PubMed ID: 33245054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting deliverability of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using aperture complexity analysis.
Younge KC; Roberts D; Janes LA; Anderson C; Moran JM; Matuszak MM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):124-131. PubMed ID: 27455504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of 4-Hz log files and secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation as patient-specific quality assurance for VMAT prostate plans.
Szeverinski P; Kowatsch M; Künzler T; Meinschad M; Clemens P; DeVries AF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 22(7):235-244. PubMed ID: 34151502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of plan parameters on the dosimetric accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Masi L; Doro R; Favuzza V; Cipressi S; Livi L
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071718. PubMed ID: 23822422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
