121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36842911)
1. Surgical outcome of a double versus a single pancreatoduodenectomy per operating day.
Theijse RT; Stoop TF; Geerdink NJ; Daams F; Zonderhuis BM; Erdmann JI; Swijnenburg RJ; Kazemier G; Busch OR; Besselink MG
Surgery; 2023 May; 173(5):1263-1269. PubMed ID: 36842911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: nationwide propensity-score-matched analysis.
de Graaf N; Zwart MJW; van Hilst J; van den Broek B; Bonsing BA; Busch OR; Coene PLO; Daams F; van Dieren S; van Eijck CHJ; Festen S; de Hingh IHJT; Lips DJ; Luyer MDP; Mieog JSD; van Santvoort HC; van der Schelling GP; Stommel MWJ; de Wilde RF; Molenaar IQ; Groot Koerkamp B; Besselink MG
Br J Surg; 2024 Jan; 111(2):. PubMed ID: 38415878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial.
van Hilst J; de Rooij T; Bosscha K; Brinkman DJ; van Dieren S; Dijkgraaf MG; Gerhards MF; de Hingh IH; Karsten TM; Lips DJ; Luyer MD; Busch OR; Festen S; Besselink MG;
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Mar; 4(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 30685489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Feasibility, Proficiency, and Mastery Learning Curves in 635 Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomies Following a Multicenter Training Program: "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants".
Zwart MJW; van den Broek B; de Graaf N; Suurmeijer JA; Augustinus S; Te Riele WW; van Santvoort HC; Hagendoorn J; Borel Rinkes IHM; van Dam JL; Takagi K; Tran KTC; Schreinemakers J; van der Schelling G; Wijsman JH; de Wilde RF; Festen S; Daams F; Luyer MD; de Hingh IHJT; Mieog JSD; Bonsing BA; Lips DJ; Abu Hilal M; Busch OR; Saint-Marc O; Zeh HJ; Zureikat AH; Hogg ME; Koerkamp BG; Molenaar IQ; Besselink MG;
Ann Surg; 2023 Dec; 278(6):e1232-e1241. PubMed ID: 37288547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Additional modifications to the Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy: Results of a propensity score-matched analysis versus Cattel-Warren pancreaticojejunostomy.
Menonna F; Napoli N; Kauffmann EF; Iacopi S; Gianfaldoni C; Martinelli C; Amorese G; Vistoli F; Boggi U
Surgery; 2021 Apr; 169(4):954-962. PubMed ID: 32958267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does center or surgeon volume influence adoption of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy? A systematic review and meta-regression.
Kamarajah SK; Abu Hilal M; White SA
Surgery; 2021 Apr; 169(4):945-953. PubMed ID: 33183790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Robotic vs Open Pancreatoduodenectomy on Incidence of Pancreatic Fistula.
McMillan MT; Zureikat AH; Hogg ME; Kowalsky SJ; Zeh HJ; Sprys MH; Vollmer CM
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):327-335. PubMed ID: 28030724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The laparoscopic approach to pancreatoduodenectomy is cost neutral in very high-volume centers.
Eguia E; Kuo PC; Sweigert PJ; Nelson MH; Aranha GV; Abood G; Godellas C; Baker MS
Surgery; 2019 Dec; 166(6):1027-1032. PubMed ID: 31472971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of shifting from laparoscopic to robotic surgery during 600 minimally invasive pancreatic and liver resections.
Emmen AMLH; Görgec B; Zwart MJW; Daams F; Erdmann J; Festen S; Gouma DJ; van Gulik TM; van Hilst J; Kazemier G; Lof S; Sussenbach SI; Tanis PJ; Zonderhuis BM; Busch OR; Swijnenburg RJ; Besselink MG;
Surg Endosc; 2023 Apr; 37(4):2659-2672. PubMed ID: 36401105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes After Minimally-invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study.
Klompmaker S; van Hilst J; Wellner UF; Busch OR; Coratti A; D'Hondt M; Dokmak S; Festen S; Kerem M; Khatkov I; Lips DJ; Lombardo C; Luyer M; Manzoni A; Molenaar IQ; Rosso E; Saint-Marc O; Vansteenkiste F; Wittel UA; Bonsing B; Groot Koerkamp B; Abu Hilal M; Fuks D; Poves I; Keck T; Boggi U; Besselink MG;
Ann Surg; 2020 Feb; 271(2):356-363. PubMed ID: 29864089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is there any difference for frail patients?
Paolini C; Bencini L; Gabellini L; Urciuoli I; Pacciani S; Tribuzi A; Moraldi L; Calistri M; Coratti A
Surg Oncol; 2021 Jun; 37():101515. PubMed ID: 33429323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Initial 50 consecutive full-robotic pancreatoduodenectomies without conversion by a single surgeon: a learning curve analysis from a tertiary referral high-volume center.
Morelli L; Furbetta N; Palmeri M; Guadagni S; Di Franco G; Gianardi D; Cervelli R; Lorenzoni V; Comandatore A; Carpenito C; Di Candio G; Cuschieri A
Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):3531-3539. PubMed ID: 36596929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. First experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Singapore.
Low TY; Koh YX; Goh BK
Singapore Med J; 2020 Nov; 61(11):598-604. PubMed ID: 31535153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
de Rooij T; van Hilst J; Bosscha K; Dijkgraaf MG; Gerhards MF; Groot Koerkamp B; Hagendoorn J; de Hingh IH; Karsten TM; Lips DJ; Luyer MD; Molenaar IQ; van Santvoort HC; Tran TCK; Busch OR; Festen S; Besselink MG;
Trials; 2018 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 29298706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 500 Minimally Invasive Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomies: One Decade of Optimizing Performance.
Zureikat AH; Beane JD; Zenati MS; Al Abbas AI; Boone BA; Moser AJ; Bartlett DL; Hogg ME; Zeh HJ
Ann Surg; 2021 May; 273(5):966-972. PubMed ID: 31851003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variation in pancreatoduodenectomy as delivered in two national audits.
Mackay TM; Wellner UF; van Rijssen LB; Stoop TF; Busch OR; Groot Koerkamp B; Bausch D; Petrova E; Besselink MG; Keck T;
Br J Surg; 2019 May; 106(6):747-755. PubMed ID: 30706456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical Outcome After Pancreatoduodenectomy for Duodenal Adenocarcinoma Compared with Other Periampullary Cancers: A Nationwide Audit Study.
de Bakker JK; Suurmeijer JA; Toennaer JGJ; Bonsing BA; Busch OR; van Eijck CH; de Hingh IH; de Meijer VE; Molenaar IQ; van Santvoort HC; Stommel MW; Festen S; van der Harst E; Patijn G; Lips DJ; Den Dulk M; Bosscha K; Besselink MG; Kazemier G;
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Apr; 30(4):2448-2455. PubMed ID: 36536196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic pancreas resections: a systematic review.
Chan KS; Wang ZK; Syn N; Goh BKP
Surgery; 2021 Jul; 170(1):194-206. PubMed ID: 33541746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of laparoscopic, robotic, and open pancreatoduodenectomy: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies.
Kabir T; Tan HL; Syn NL; Wu EJ; Kam JH; Goh BKP
Surgery; 2022 Feb; 171(2):476-489. PubMed ID: 34454723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of conversion to open surgery during robotic and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy and effect on outcomes: international propensity score-matched comparison study.
Lof S; Vissers FL; Klompmaker S; Berti S; Boggi U; Coratti A; Dokmak S; Fara R; Festen S; D'Hondt M; Khatkov I; Lips D; Luyer M; Manzoni A; Rosso E; Saint-Marc O; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Br J Surg; 2021 Jan; 108(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 33640946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
