BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36843836)

  • 21. Judicial bypass for minors post-
    Horvath S; Frietsche S
    Womens Health (Lond); 2023; 19():17455057231219601. PubMed ID: 38146197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. New Gaps and Urgent Needs in Graduate Medical Education and Training in Abortion.
    Beasley AD; Olatunde A; Cahill EP; Shaw KA
    Acad Med; 2023 Apr; 98(4):436-439. PubMed ID: 36656271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. US Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Perceived Impacts of Post-Dobbs v Jackson State Abortion Bans.
    Sabbath EL; McKetchnie SM; Arora KS; Buchbinder M
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jan; 7(1):e2352109. PubMed ID: 38231510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs.
    Vinekar K; Karlapudi A; Nathan L; Turk JK; Rible R; Steinauer J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 140(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 35852261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The state of abortion rights in the US.
    Davis MF
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):324-329. PubMed ID: 35975678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
    Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Post-Roe emergency medicine: Policy, clinical, training, and individual implications for emergency clinicians.
    Samuels-Kalow ME; Agrawal P; Rodriguez G; Zeidan A; Love JS; Monette D; Lin M; Cooper RJ; Madsen TE; Dobiesz V
    Acad Emerg Med; 2022 Dec; 29(12):1414-1421. PubMed ID: 36268814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Abortion Is a Right: Perspectives of Family Medicine Physician Residents.
    Vasudevan A; Mullin B; Fenning R; Freschl G; Mostow J; Bogen H; Whitaker A; Anderson Z; Su A; Naicker S; Chow Y; Tsai J; Oseguera B; Chin J
    Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31506. PubMed ID: 36540456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A national analysis of ED presentations for early pregnancy and complications: Implications for post-Roe America.
    Goodwin G; Marra E; Ramdin C; Alexander AB; Ye PP; Nelson LS; Mazer-Amirshahi M
    Am J Emerg Med; 2023 Aug; 70():90-95. PubMed ID: 37245403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dobbs Versus Jackson: Epilepsy, Reproductive Health, and Abortion.
    Weatherspoon S; Davis A; Keezer M; Zutshi D; Pack A
    Epilepsy Curr; 2023; 23(4):211-216. PubMed ID: 37662462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vasectomy incidence in the military health system after the reversal of Roe v. Wade.
    Pierson BC; Banaag A; Janvrin ML; Koehlmoos TP
    Int J Impot Res; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38762601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptions of abortion access across the United States prior to the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision: Results from a national survey.
    Crawford BL; Simmons MK; Turner RC; Lo WJ; Jozkowski KN
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2023 Sep; 55(3):153-164. PubMed ID: 37475195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Trainee Perspectives Regarding the Effect of the
    Meriwether KV; Kim-Fine S; Ablove T; Ollendorff A; Dale LE; Krashin JW; Winkelman WD; Orejuela F; Mazloomdoost D; Grimes CL; Beckham AJ; Propst K; Florian-Rodriguez ME; Turk JK; Chang OH; Horvath S; Ros ST; Crisp CC; Petersen TR; Iglesia CB
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38629505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating participant engagement in a preconception cohort study in relation to the Dobbs decision.
    Willis MD; Hoffman MN; Wang TR; Sabbath EL; Kuriyama AS; Wesselink AK; Wise LA
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38666636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does overruling Roe discriminate against women (of colour)?
    Räsänen J; Gothreau C; Lippert-Rasmussen K
    J Med Ethics; 2022 Dec; 48(12):952-956. PubMed ID: 36180204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision on Obstetrics and Gynecology Graduating Residents' Practice Plans.
    Woodcock AL; Carter G; Baayd J; Turok DK; Turk J; Sanders JN; Pangasa M; Gawron LM; Kaiser JE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Nov; 142(5):1105-1111. PubMed ID: 37769302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical and Advocacy Implications of the
    Gautham I; Coverdale J; Nguyen PT; Gordon MR
    Violence Against Women; 2024 Mar; ():10778012241231779. PubMed ID: 38425289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anxiety and Depression Symptoms After the Dobbs Abortion Decision.
    Thornburg B; Kennedy-Hendricks A; Rosen JD; Eisenberg MD
    JAMA; 2024 Jan; 331(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 38261045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Teratology research in the shadow of the Dobbs decision.
    Lyerly AD
    Birth Defects Res; 2023 Aug; 115(14):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 37621193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.