219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36844244)
1. Additively manufactured polyether ether ketone (PEEK) skull implant as an alternative to titanium mesh in cranioplasty.
Zhang J; Su Y; Rao X; Pang H; Zhu H; Liu L; Chen L; Li D; He J; Peng J; Jiang Y
Int J Bioprint; 2023; 9(1):634. PubMed ID: 36844244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) and Its 3D-Printed Quantitate Assessment in Cranial Reconstruction.
Moiduddin K; Mian SH; Elseufy SM; Alkhalefah H; Ramalingam S; Sayeed A
J Funct Biomater; 2023 Aug; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 37623673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid high-fidelity contour shaping of titanium mesh implants for cranioplasty defects using patient-specific molds created with low-cost 3D printing: A case series.
Kinsman M; Aljuboori Z; Ball T; Nauta H; Boakye M
Surg Neurol Int; 2020; 11():288. PubMed ID: 33033650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Additive manufactured polyether-ether-ketone implants for orthopaedic applications: a narrative review.
Sun C; Kang J; Yang C; Zheng J; Su Y; Dong E; Liu Y; Yao S; Shi C; Pang H; He J; Wang L; Liu C; Peng J; Liu L; Jiang Y; Li D
Biomater Transl; 2022; 3(2):116-133. PubMed ID: 36105567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients.
Oliver JD; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Vyas KS; Sharaf B
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 May; 82(5S Suppl 4):S289-S294. PubMed ID: 30973834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed-tomography modeled polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants in revision cranioplasty.
O'Reilly EB; Barnett S; Madden C; Welch B; Mickey B; Rozen S
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Mar; 68(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 25541423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design of customized implants and 3D printing of symmetric and asymmetric cranial cavities.
Singh HN; Agrawal S; Kuthe AM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106061. PubMed ID: 37544200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applications of 3D-Printed PEEK via Fused Filament Fabrication: A Systematic Review.
Dua R; Rashad Z; Spears J; Dunn G; Maxwell M
Polymers (Basel); 2021 Nov; 13(22):. PubMed ID: 34833346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of printing path and material components on mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone/hydroxyapatite composites.
Zheng J; Kang J; Sun C; Yang C; Wang L; Li D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jun; 118():104475. PubMed ID: 33773239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mesh Ti6Al4V Material Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting (SLM) as a Promising Intervertebral Fusion Cage.
Przekora A; Kazimierczak P; Wojcik M; Chodorski E; Kropiwnicki J
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Apr; 23(7):. PubMed ID: 35409345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative Assessment of Point-of-Care 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cranial Implants.
Sharma N; Aghlmandi S; Dalcanale F; Seiler D; Zeilhofer HF; Honigmann P; Thieringer FM
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Aug; 22(16):. PubMed ID: 34445228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of Layer Thickness and Raster Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a Comparative Mechanical Study between PEEK and ABS.
Wu W; Geng P; Li G; Zhao D; Zhang H; Zhao J
Materials (Basel); 2015 Sep; 8(9):5834-5846. PubMed ID: 28793537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Powder Bed Fusion Versus Material Extrusion: A Comparative Case Study on Polyether-Ether-Ketone Cranial Implants.
Liu Y; Yi N; Davies R; McCutchion P; Ghita O
3D Print Addit Manuf; 2023 Oct; 10(5):941-954. PubMed ID: 37886420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Use of the Three-Dimensional Printed Polyether Ether Ketone Implant in Secondary Craniosynostosis Revision.
Atamian EK; Hazkour N; Palacios J; Pessino K; Raza SA; Schneider SJ; Bastidas N
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Sep; 33(6):1734-1738. PubMed ID: 35762609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical behaviour of reconstructed defected skull with custom PEEK implant and Titanium fixture plates under dynamic loading conditions using FEM.
Jindal P; Bharti J; Gupta V; Dhami SS
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106063. PubMed ID: 37556925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [First Experience with Cranioplasty Using the Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Implant - Retrospective Five-Year Follow-up Study].
Šámal F; Ouzký M; Strnad J; Haninec P; Linzer P; Filip M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2019; 86(6):431-434. PubMed ID: 31941571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical properties of fused filament fabricated PEEK for biomedical applications depending on additive manufacturing parameters.
Wang Y; Müller WD; Rumjahn A; Schmidt F; Schwitalla AD
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104250. PubMed ID: 33302091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome and risk factors of complications after cranioplasty with polyetheretherketone and titanium mesh: A single-center retrospective study.
Yao S; Zhang Q; Mai Y; Yang H; Li Y; Zhang M; Zhang R
Front Neurol; 2022; 13():926436. PubMed ID: 36212642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality Characteristics and Clinical Relevance of In-House 3D-Printed Customized Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Implants for Craniofacial Reconstruction.
Sharma N; Aghlmandi S; Cao S; Kunz C; Honigmann P; Thieringer FM
J Clin Med; 2020 Aug; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 32878160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With PEEK Versus Titanium Cranioplasty Reconstruction.
Asaad M; Taslakian EN; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Bite U; Mardini S; Van Gompel JJ; Sharaf B
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jan-Feb 01; 32(1):193-197. PubMed ID: 33074970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
