These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36844356)

  • 1. Don't worry about the anchor-item setting in longitudinal learning diagnostic assessments.
    Yu X; Zhan P; Chen Q
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1112463. PubMed ID: 36844356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incorporating the Q-Matrix Into Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models.
    da Silva MA; Liu R; Huggins-Manley AC; Bazán JL
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Aug; 79(4):665-687. PubMed ID: 32655178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
    Choi Y; Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Semi-supervised Learning Method for Q-Matrix Specification Under the DINA and DINO Model With Independent Structure.
    Wang W; Song L; Ding S; Wang T; Gao P; Xiong J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2120. PubMed ID: 33013538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating Measurement Invariance in Computer-Based Personality Testing: The Impact of Using Anchor Items on Effect Size Indices.
    Egberink IJL; Meijer RR; Tendeiro JN
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Feb; 75(1):126-145. PubMed ID: 29795815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effects of Q-Matrix Design on Classification Accuracy in the Log-Linear Cognitive Diagnosis Model.
    Madison MJ; Bradshaw LP
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Jun; 75(3):491-511. PubMed ID: 29795830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining Parameter Invariance in a General Diagnostic Classification Model.
    Ravand H; Baghaei P; Doebler P
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2930. PubMed ID: 31998189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Kim JK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():15. PubMed ID: 34225413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical Analysis of
    Chen Y; Liu J; Xu G; Ying Z
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2015; 110(510):850-866. PubMed ID: 26294801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Q-Matrix Designs of Longitudinal Diagnostic Classification Models With Hierarchical Attributes for Formative Assessment.
    Tian W; Zhang J; Peng Q; Yang X
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1694. PubMed ID: 32903650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Q-Matrix Anchored Mixture Rasch Model.
    Tseng MC; Wang WC
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():564976. PubMed ID: 33746812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DINA Models for Multiple-Choice Items With Few Parameters: Considering Incorrect Answers.
    Ozaki K
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Sep; 39(6):431-447. PubMed ID: 29881017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linking of Rasch-Scaled Tests: Consequences of Limited Item Pools and Model Misfit.
    Fischer L; Rohm T; Carstensen CH; Gnambs T
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():633896. PubMed ID: 34295279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anchor Selection Strategies for DIF Analysis: Review, Assessment, and New Approaches.
    Kopf J; Zeileis A; Strobl C
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Feb; 75(1):22-56. PubMed ID: 29795811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Data-Driven Learning of Q-Matrix.
    Liu J; Xu G; Ying Z
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2012 Oct; 36(7):548-564. PubMed ID: 23926363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Adaptive Design for Item Parameter Online Estimation and Q-Matrix Online Calibration in CD-CAT.
    Wang W; Tu Y; Song L; Zheng J; Wang T
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():710497. PubMed ID: 34504460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Markov Estimation Strategy for Longitudinal Learning Diagnosis: Providing Timely Diagnostic Feedback.
    Zhan P
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Dec; 80(6):1145-1167. PubMed ID: 33116330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Q-Matrix Refinement Based on Item Fit Statistic RMSEA.
    Kang C; Yang Y; Zeng P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):527-542. PubMed ID: 31534288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.