These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36844478)

  • 1. Multiply robust matching estimators of average and quantile treatment effects.
    Yang S; Zhang Y
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2023 Mar; 50(1):235-265. PubMed ID: 36844478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiply robust estimation of causal quantile treatment effects.
    Xie Y; Cotton C; Zhu Y
    Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(28):4238-4251. PubMed ID: 32857876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MULTIPLY ROBUST ESTIMATORS OF CAUSAL EFFECTS FOR SURVIVAL OUTCOMES.
    Wen L; Hernán MA; Robins JM
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2022 Sep; 49(3):1304-1328. PubMed ID: 36033967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ensemble and calibration multiply robust estimation for quantile treatment effect.
    He X; Wang L
    J Appl Stat; 2022; 49(15):3823-3845. PubMed ID: 36324477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A semiparametric multiply robust multiple imputation method for causal inference.
    Gochanour B; Chen S; Beebe L; Haziza D
    Metrika; 2023 Jul; 86(5):517-542. PubMed ID: 38736753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practical recommendations on double score matching for estimating causal effects.
    Zhang Y; Yang S; Ye W; Faries DE; Lipkovich I; Kadziola Z
    Stat Med; 2022 Apr; 41(8):1421-1445. PubMed ID: 34957585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Asymptotic theory and inference of predictive mean matching imputation using a superpopulation model framework.
    Yang S; Kim JK
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2020 Sep; 47(3):839-861. PubMed ID: 34305262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
    Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Censored quantile regression based on multiply robust propensity scores.
    Wang X; Qin G; Song X; Tang Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Mar; 31(3):475-487. PubMed ID: 34903106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.
    Hattori S; Henmi M
    Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24571129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score.
    Xu J; Wei K; Wang C; Huang C; Xue Y; Zhang R; Qin G; Yu Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):337. PubMed ID: 36577950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subclassification estimation of the weighted average treatment effect.
    Choi BY
    Biom J; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1706-1728. PubMed ID: 34270815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
    van der Laan MJ; Gruber S
    Int J Biostat; 2010 May; 6(1):Article 17. PubMed ID: 20628637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Closed-form variance estimator for weighted propensity score estimators with survival outcome.
    Hajage D; Chauvet G; Belin L; Lafourcade A; Tubach F; De Rycke Y
    Biom J; 2018 Nov; 60(6):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 30257058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Model averaged double robust estimation.
    Cefalu M; Dominici F; Arvold N; Parmigiani G
    Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):410-421. PubMed ID: 27893927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Balancing Score Adjusted Targeted Minimum Loss-based Estimation.
    Lendle SD; Fireman B; van der Laan MJ
    J Causal Inference; 2015 Sep; 3(2):139-155. PubMed ID: 26561539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.