These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3684483)

  • 1. Flicker contrast sensitivity in normal and specifically disabled readers.
    Martin F; Lovegrove W
    Perception; 1987; 16(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 3684483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uniform-field flicker masking in control and specifically-disabled readers.
    Martin F; Lovegrove WJ
    Perception; 1988; 17(2):203-14. PubMed ID: 3226864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial-frequency-dependent visible persistence and specific reading disability.
    Slaghuis WL; Lovegrove WJ
    Brain Cogn; 1985 Apr; 4(2):219-40. PubMed ID: 4015875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental evidence for a transient system deficit in specific reading disability.
    Lovegrove WJ; Garzia RP; Nicholson SB
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1990 Feb; 61(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 2179383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast sensitivity functions and specific reading disability.
    Lovegrove W; Martin F; Bowling A; Blackwood M; Badcock D; Paxton S
    Neuropsychologia; 1982; 20(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 7121798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vernier acuity for edges defined by flicker.
    Fendick MG; Swindale NV
    Vision Res; 1994 Oct; 34(20):2717-26. PubMed ID: 7975309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coherent motion threshold measurements for M-cell deficit differ for above- and below-average readers.
    Solan HA; Hansen PC; Shelley-Tremblay J; Ficarra A
    Optometry; 2003 Nov; 74(11):727-34. PubMed ID: 14653660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual consequences of a temporal processing deficit in reading disabled children.
    Williams MC; Lecluyse K
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1990 Feb; 61(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 2313028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationships between global motion and global form processing, practice, cognitive and visual processing in adults with dyslexia or visual discomfort.
    Conlon EG; Sanders MA; Wright CM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):907-15. PubMed ID: 19166866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flicker masking of spatial-frequency-dependent visible persistence and specific reading disability.
    Slaghuis WL; Lovegrove W
    Perception; 1984; 13(5):527-34. PubMed ID: 6535978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysical investigations of the temporal modulation sensitivity function in amblyopia: spatiotemporal interactions.
    Manny RE; Levi DM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1982 Apr; 22(4):525-34. PubMed ID: 7061221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast sensitivity in dyslexia.
    Gross-Glenn K; Skottun BC; Glenn W; Kushch A; Lingua R; Dunbar M; Jallad B; Lubs HA; Levin B; Rabin M
    Vis Neurosci; 1995; 12(1):153-63. PubMed ID: 7718496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Color-mediated contrast sensitivity in disabled readers.
    Solman RT; Dain SJ; Keech SL
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 May; 68(5):331-7. PubMed ID: 1852393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Color and luminance increment thresholds in poor readers.
    Dain SJ; Floyd RA; Elliot RT
    Vis Neurosci; 2008; 25(3):481-6. PubMed ID: 18598422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial and temporal vision in patients treated for bilateral congenital cataracts.
    Ellemberg D; Lewis TL; Maurer D; Lui CH; Brent HP
    Vision Res; 1999 Oct; 39(20):3480-9. PubMed ID: 10615511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Specific reading disability: differences in contrast sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency.
    Lovegrove WJ; Bowling A; Badcock D; Blackwood M
    Science; 1980 Oct; 210(4468):439-40. PubMed ID: 7433985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of field size and luminance on contrast sensitivity differences between specifically reading disabled and normal children.
    Martin F; Lovegrove W
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 6709178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The subjective sensitivity to small changes in the contrast of a suprathreshold grating.
    Walsh G; Charman WN
    Vision Res; 1990; 30(1):163-73. PubMed ID: 2321361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast sensitivity differences between proficient and disabled readers using colored lenses.
    Spafford CS; Grosser GS; Donatelle JR; Squillace SR; Dana JP
    J Learn Disabil; 1995 Apr; 28(4):240-52. PubMed ID: 7738436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial frequency sensitivity differences between adults of good and poor reading ability.
    Patching GR; Jordan TR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(6):2219-24. PubMed ID: 15914644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.