BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36845868)

  • 1. Should Acellular Dermal Matrices Be Used for Implant-based Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy? Clinical Recommendation Based on the GRADE Approach.
    Cinquini M; Rocco N; Catanuto G; Garreffa E; Ferrando PM; Gonzalez-Lorenzo M; Maglia A; Montagna G; Villanucci A; Visintini Cividin V; Nava MB
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2023 Feb; 11(2):e4821. PubMed ID: 36845868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
    Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
    Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
    Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy With and Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Among Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Brandberg Y; Frisell J
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Oct; 4(10):e2127806. PubMed ID: 34596671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A direct comparison of porcine (Strattice™) and bovine (Surgimend™) acellular dermal matrices in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.
    Ball JF; Sheena Y; Tarek Saleh DM; Forouhi P; Benyon SL; Irwin MS; Malata CM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1076-1082. PubMed ID: 28624524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implant Based Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix: Safety Data From an Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial in the Setting of Breast Cancer Treatment.
    Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Roy PG; Johansson H; Brandberg Y; Eriksen C; Frisell J
    Ann Surg; 2019 May; 269(5):836-841. PubMed ID: 30308615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alloplastic adjuncts in breast reconstruction.
    Cabalag MS; Rostek M; Miller GS; Chae MP; Quinn T; Rozen WM; Hunter-Smith DJ
    Gland Surg; 2016 Apr; 5(2):158-73. PubMed ID: 27047784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
    Negenborn VL; Smit JM; Dikmans REG; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
    Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 30835827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First experience using contrast-enhanced ultrasound to evaluate vascularisation of acellular dermal matrices after implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Parvizi D; Haas F; Peintinger F; Hubmer M; Rappl T; Koch H; Schintler M; Spendel S; Kamolz LP; Wurzer P; Tuca A; Fuchsjaeger M; Weinke R
    Breast J; 2014; 20(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 25041092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic review and critical appraisal of the impact of acellular dermal matrix use on the outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Potter S; Browning D; Savović J; Holcombe C; Blazeby JM
    Br J Surg; 2015 Aug; 102(9):1010-25. PubMed ID: 26109277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Passot-Type Immediate Breast Reconstruction Obviates the Use of Aceullular Dermal Matrix in Grades 2 and 3 Ptosis.
    Rivet JJ; Day KM; Rau JF; Waldrop JL; Brzezienski MA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 82(6S Suppl 5):S394-S398. PubMed ID: 30694845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient-reported Outcomes after ADM-assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-sectional Study.
    Negenborn VL; Dikmans REG; Bouman MB; Wilschut JA; Mullender MG; Salzberg CA
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2018 Feb; 6(2):e1654. PubMed ID: 29616167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A New Human-Derived Acellular Dermal Matrix for Breast Reconstruction Available for the European Market: Preliminary Results.
    Folli S; Curcio A; Melandri D; Bondioli E; Rocco N; Catanuto G; Falcini F; Purpura V; Mingozzi M; Buggi F; Marongiu F
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Apr; 42(2):434-441. PubMed ID: 29302735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after implant-based breast reconstruction with or without acellular dermal matrix: randomized clinical trial.
    Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Frisell J; Brandberg Y
    BJS Open; 2020 Oct; 4(5):811-820. PubMed ID: 32762012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relationship of human acellular dermal matrix thickness on complication rate and patient-reported outcomes in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.
    Hong SE; Kim JH
    Gland Surg; 2021 Jan; 10(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 33633966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk of breast implant removal after one- versus two-stage breast reconstructive surgery.
    Theunissen CIJM; Brohet RM; Hu Y; van Uchelen JH; Mensen JHC; van Rijssen AL
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 May; 75(5):1610-1616. PubMed ID: 34975002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction types at a breast cancer tertiary referral centre before and after introduction of acellular dermal matrices.
    Kankam HKN; Hourston GJM; Fopp LJ; Benson JR; Benyon SL; Irwin MS; Agrawal A; Forouhi P; Malata CM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Jan; 71(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 28917935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient-reported outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without biological or synthetic mesh.
    Sewart E; Turner NL; Conroy EJ; Cutress RI; Skillman J; Whisker L; Thrush S; Barnes N; Holcombe C; Potter S;
    BJS Open; 2021 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 33609398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tissue Reinforcement in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.
    Scheflan M; Colwell AS
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2014 Aug; 2(8):e192. PubMed ID: 25426375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.