These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36845868)

  • 21. A Review of the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrices in Postmastectomy Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
    Chao AH
    Plast Surg Nurs; 2015; 35(3):131-4; quiz 135-6. PubMed ID: 26313677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Immediate Breast Cancer Reconstruction with or without Dermal Matrix or Synthetic Mesh Support: A Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
    Murphy D; O'Donnell JP; Ryan ÉJ; Lane O'Neill B; Boland MR; Lowery AJ; Kerin MJ; McInerney NM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Apr; 151(4):563e-574e. PubMed ID: 36729988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ostapenko E; Nixdorf L; Devyatko Y; Exner R; Wimmer K; Fitzal F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jan; 30(1):126-136. PubMed ID: 36245049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Human Acellular Dermal Matrix (Epiflex®) in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Skin- and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Treatment of Capsular Fibrosis: Results of a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational NOGGO-AWOGyn Study.
    Beier L; Faridi A; Neumann C; Paepke S; Mau C; Keller M; Strittmatter HJ; Gerber-Schäfer C; Bauer L; Karsten MM; Kümmel S; Blohmer JU
    Breast Care (Basel); 2021 Oct; 16(5):461-467. PubMed ID: 34720805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Should oncoplastic breast conserving surgery be used for the treatment of early stage breast cancer? Using the GRADE approach for development of clinical recommendations.
    Rocco N; Catanuto G; Cinquini M; Audretsch W; Benson J; Criscitiello C; Di Micco R; Kovacs T; Kuerer H; Lozza L; Montagna G; Moschetti I; Nafissi N; O'Connell RL; Oliveri S; Pau L; Scaperrotta G; Thoma A; Winters Z; Nava MB
    Breast; 2021 Jun; 57():25-35. PubMed ID: 33711697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy.
    Roberts K; Mills N; Metcalfe C; Lane A; Clement C; Hollingworth W; Taylor J; Holcombe C; Skillman J; Fairhurst K; Whisker L; Cutress R; Thrush S; Fairbrother P; Potter S
    BMJ Open; 2021 Nov; 11(11):e050886. PubMed ID: 34848516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biological Matrix-Assisted One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications.
    Gao P; Bai P; Ren Y; Kong X; Wang Z; Fang Y; Wang J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Dec; 45(6):2581-2590. PubMed ID: 34350500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acellular dermal matrices as an adjunct to implant breast reconstruction: Analysis of outcomes and complications.
    Tasoulis MK; Teoh V; Khan A; Montgomery C; Mohammed K; Gui G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Apr; 46(4 Pt A):511-515. PubMed ID: 31706716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction with the use of bovine-derived acellular dermal matrix (SurgiMend™) in implant based immediate reconstruction following skin sparing mastectomy: A prospective observational study in a single centre.
    Headon H; Kasem A; Manson A; Choy C; Carmichael AR; Mokbel K
    Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 25(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 27312036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. BROWSE: A multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes.
    Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Johnson RK; Harvey JR
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 34836730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Alloderm-RTU with DermACELL in Immediate Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
    Arnaout A; Zhang J; Frank S; Momtazi M; Cordeiro E; Roberts A; Ghumman A; Fergusson D; Stober C; Pond G; Jeong A; Vandermeer L; Hutton B; Clemons M; On Behalf Of The REaCT Investigators
    Curr Oncol; 2020 Dec; 28(1):184-195. PubMed ID: 33704185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
    Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Single stage immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix and implant: Defining the risks and outcomes of post-mastectomy radiotherapy.
    Apte A; Walsh M; Balaji P; Khor B; Chandrasekharan S; Chakravorty A
    Surgeon; 2020 Aug; 18(4):202-207. PubMed ID: 31636037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Subpectoral versus prepectoral two-stage breast reconstruction: A propensity score-matched analysis of 30-day morbidity and long-term outcomes.
    Escandón JM; Sweitzer K; Christiano JG; Gooch JC; Olzinski AT; Prieto PA; Skinner KA; Langstein HN; Manrique OJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Jan; 76():76-87. PubMed ID: 36513014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prepectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix: Do We See a Difference?
    Manrique OJ; Huang TC; Martinez-Jorge J; Ciudad P; Forte AJ; Bustos SS; Boughey JC; Jakub JW; Degnim AC; Galan R
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 145(2):263e-272e. PubMed ID: 31985613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of Human, Porcine, and Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.
    Pires GR; Moss WD; Hosein RC; Overschmidt BT; Magno-Padron DA; Agarwal JP; McFarland MM; Casucci T; Kwok AC
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Dec; 89(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 36416706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Novel devices for implant-based breast reconstruction: is the use of meshes to support the lower pole justified in terms of benefits? A review of the evidence.
    Cook LJ; Kovacs T
    Ecancermedicalscience; 2018; 12():796. PubMed ID: 29434662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dermal Autograft Using Donor Breast as Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Review.
    North WD; Kubajak CS; St Martin B; Rinker B
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Jun; 78(6S Suppl 5):S282-S285. PubMed ID: 28296716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Complication Rate of Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Using Human Acellular Dermal Matrices.
    Mangialardi ML; Salgarello M; Cacciatore P; Baldelli I; Raposio E
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 Dec; 8(12):e3235. PubMed ID: 33425578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of two cadaveric acellular dermal matrices for immediate breast reconstruction: A prospective randomized trial.
    Hinchcliff KM; Orbay H; Busse BK; Charvet H; Kaur M; Sahar DE
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 May; 70(5):568-576. PubMed ID: 28341592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.