These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36846538)
1. Evaluation of the Effect of Intubation Box use on Tracheal Intubation Difficulty with King Vision Nazir N Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care; 2021 Jul; 28(1):25-28. PubMed ID: 36846538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of an aerosol box on tracheal intubation difficulty. Wakabayashi R; Ishida T; Yamada T; Kawamata M J Anesth; 2020 Oct; 34(5):790-793. PubMed ID: 32728963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of VividTrac®, Airtraq®, King Vision®, Macintosh Laryngoscope and a Custom-Made Videolaryngoscope for difficult and normal airways in mannequins by novices. Rendeki S; Keresztes D; Woth G; Mérei Á; Rozanovic M; Rendeki M; Farkas J; Mühl D; Nagy B BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 May; 17(1):68. PubMed ID: 28549421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Evaluation of McGrath MAC, Truview Video Laryngoscopes and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Surgery under General Anaesthesia. Kaur G; Gupta S; Mehta N; Dhingra JS Anesth Essays Res; 2020; 14(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 32843786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A feasibility study of awake videolaryngoscope-assisted intubation in patients with periglottic tumour using the channelled King Vision Markova L; Stopar-Pintaric T; Luzar T; Benedik J; Hodzovic I Anaesthesia; 2017 Apr; 72(4):512-518. PubMed ID: 27928826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of McCoy, TruView, and Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in patients with immobilized cervical spine. Bharti N; Arora S; Panda NB Saudi J Anaesth; 2014 Apr; 8(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 24843330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of Truview EVO2 laryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: A randomized crossover clinical trial. Arora S; Sayeed H; Bhardwaj N Saudi J Anaesth; 2013 Jul; 7(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 24015124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Evaluation of Linscope and King Vision Video Laryngoscopes in Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Luqman M; Ahmed SM; Shaharyar A; Mannan R Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56514. PubMed ID: 38646394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intubation with channeled versus non-channeled video laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airway by junior doctors in an out-of-hospital setting: A crossover manikin study. Chew SH; Lim JZM; Chin BZB; Chan JX; Siew RCH PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0224017. PubMed ID: 31639167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the TruView PCD video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope for pediatric tracheal intubation by novice paramedics: a randomized crossover simulation trial. Szarpak Ł; Czyżewski Ł; Kurowski A; Truszewski Z Eur J Pediatr; 2015 Oct; 174(10):1325-32. PubMed ID: 25894914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between C-MAC and King Vision video laryngoscope (channelled blade) for tracheal intubation in aerosol-prevention intubation box for COVID-19 patients: A manikin-based study. Kumar B; Ratre BK; Garg R; Meena JK; Singh R; Bhatnagar S Indian J Anaesth; 2022 Mar; 66(3):187-192. PubMed ID: 35497695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Glidescope, the Pentax AWS, and the Truview EVO2 with the Macintosh laryngoscope in experienced anaesthetists: a manikin study. Malik MA; O'Donoghue C; Carney J; Maharaj CH; Harte BH; Laffey JG Br J Anaesth; 2009 Jan; 102(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 19059923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cricoid pressure with the Truview Evo2™ laryngoscope improves the glottic view. Kumar N; Behera D; Dali JS; Arya M; Gupta A Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):810-4. PubMed ID: 21691934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparative Evaluation of 2 Videolaryngoscopes as an Intubation Aid in a Simulated Difficult Airway: A Prospective Randomised Study. Kumar A; Taluja A; Saxena B; Dwivedi P Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2022 Oct; 50(5):340-345. PubMed ID: 36301282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the king vision video laryngoscope with the macintosh laryngoscope. Murphy LD; Kovacs GJ; Reardon PM; Law JA J Emerg Med; 2014 Aug; 47(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 24742495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of intubation success and glottic visualization using King Vision and C-MAC videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine injuries with cervical immobilization: A randomized clinical trial. Shravanalakshmi D; Bidkar PU; Narmadalakshmi K; Lata S; Mishra SK; Adinarayanan S Surg Neurol Int; 2017; 8():19. PubMed ID: 28217398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized equivalence trial of the King Vision aBlade videolaryngoscope with the Miller direct laryngoscope for routine tracheal intubation in children <2 yr of age. Jagannathan N; Hajduk J; Sohn L; Huang A; Sawardekar A; Albers B; Bienia S; De Oliveira GS Br J Anaesth; 2017 Jun; 118(6):932-937. PubMed ID: 28549081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of paediatric King Vision™ videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for elective tracheal intubation in children of age less than 1 year: A randomised clinical trial. Manirajan M; Bidkar PU; Sivakumar RK; Lata S; Srinivasan G; Jha AK Indian J Anaesth; 2020 Nov; 64(11):943-948. PubMed ID: 33487678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A comparison of McGrath(®) video laryngoscope and Truview EVO2(®) laryngoscope. Bhola R; Bhalla S; Gupta R; Singh I; Kumar S Indian J Anaesth; 2014 May; 58(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 25024468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]