These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36847427)

  • 1. The influence of foreperiod duration on the preparation and control of sequential aiming movements.
    Khan MA; Kurniawan A; Khan ME; Khan MC; Smith KL; Scharoun Benson S; Carlsen AN; Lawrence GP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Feb; 77(2):242-256. PubMed ID: 36847427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distinct Modulations in Sensorimotor Postmovement and Foreperiod β-Band Activities Related to Error Salience Processing and Sensorimotor Adaptation.
    Torrecillos F; Alayrangues J; Kilavik BE; Malfait N
    J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(37):12753-65. PubMed ID: 26377464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Independent planning of timing and sequencing for complex movements.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Klapp ST; Franks IM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1158-72. PubMed ID: 26882180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reaction time changes with the hazard rate for a behaviorally relevant event when monkeys perform a delayed wrist movement task.
    Tsunoda Y; Kakei S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 18243554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The increased foreperiod duration to attain the neutral optimal preparation from sitting to standing.
    Cuisinier R; Olivier I; Nougier V
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 180(2):321-31. PubMed ID: 17265039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential aiming movements and the one-target advantage in individuals with Down syndrome.
    Lawrence GP; Reilly NE; Mottram TM; Khan MA; Elliott D
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Nov; 34(11):3858-66. PubMed ID: 24025437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Foreperiod length, but not memory, affects human reaction time in a precued, delayed response.
    Mohagheghi AA; Anson JG; Hyland BI; Parr-Brownlie L; Wickens JR
    Motor Control; 1998 Apr; 2(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 9644284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequential aiming with two limbs and the one-target advantage.
    Khan MA; Mottram TM; Adam JJ; Buckolz E
    J Mot Behav; 2010; 42(5):325-30. PubMed ID: 20826424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pupillary fluctuation amplitude preceding target presentation is linked to the variable foreperiod effect on reaction time in Psychomotor Vigilance Tasks.
    Yamashita J; Terashima H; Yoneya M; Maruya K; Oishi H; Kumada T
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0276205. PubMed ID: 36264952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Control of response timing occurs during the simple reaction time interval but on-line for choice reaction time.
    Maslovat D; Klapp ST; Jagacinski RJ; Franks IM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):2005-21. PubMed ID: 25068697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Programming and execution of movement in Parkinson's disease.
    Sheridan MR; Flowers KA; Hurrell J
    Brain; 1987 Oct; 110 ( Pt 5)():1247-71. PubMed ID: 3676700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of response complexity on simple reaction time occurs even with a highly predictable imperative stimulus.
    Maslovat D; Klapp ST; Forgaard CJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Jun; 704():62-66. PubMed ID: 30946926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task complexity differentially affects executed and imagined movement preparation: evidence from movement-related potentials.
    Kranczioch C; Mathews S; Dean P; Sterr A
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9284. PubMed ID: 20174567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sequential aiming with one and two limbs: effects of target size.
    Mottram TM; Khan MA; Lawrence GP; Adam JJ; Buckolz E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():83-8. PubMed ID: 24959974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motor preparation in a memorised delay task.
    Jordan K; Hyland BI; Wickens JR; Anson JG
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 166(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 16032407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of advance information on the response complexity effect in manual aiming movements.
    Khan MA; Mourton S; Buckolz E; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 17521597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The one-target advantage: advanced preparation or online processing?
    Lavrysen A; Helsen WF; Elliott DJ; Adam JJ
    Motor Control; 2002 Jul; 6(3):230-45. PubMed ID: 12122218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of a neutral warning signal under increased temporal uncertainty.
    Han T; Proctor RW
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1346-1357. PubMed ID: 36811693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduced intracortical inhibition during the foreperiod of a warned reaction time task.
    Sinclair C; Hammond GR
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 186(3):385-92. PubMed ID: 18074124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The control of sequential aiming movements: the influence of practice and manual asymmetries on the one-target advantage.
    Lavrysen A; Helsen WF; Tremblay L; Elliott D; Adam JJ; Feys P; Buekers MJ
    Cortex; 2003 Apr; 39(2):307-25. PubMed ID: 12784891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.