234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36847591)
1. Progestin intrauterine devices versus copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception.
Ramanadhan S; Goldstuck N; Henderson JT; Che Y; Cleland K; Dodge LE; Edelman A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Feb; 2(2):CD013744. PubMed ID: 36847591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion of contraceptive implant and IUD for contraception.
Sothornwit J; Kaewrudee S; Lumbiganon P; Pattanittum P; Averbach SH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Oct; 10(10):CD011913. PubMed ID: 36302159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs.
Chi IC
Contraception; 1991 Dec; 44(6):573-88. PubMed ID: 1773615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.
French R; Van Vliet H; Cowan F; Mansour D; Morris S; Hughes D; Robinson A; Proctor T; Summerbell C; Logan S; Helmerhorst F; Guillebaud J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; 2004(3):CD001776. PubMed ID: 15266453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. One-year continuation of copper or levonorgestrel intrauterine devices initiated at the time of emergency contraception.
Sanders JN; Turok DK; Royer PA; Thompson IS; Gawron LM; Storck KE
Contraception; 2017 Aug; 96(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 28596121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: a systematic review.
Jatlaoui TC; Riley HEM; Curtis KM
Contraception; 2017 Jan; 95(1):17-39. PubMed ID: 27771475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detailed analysis of menstrual bleeding patterns after postmenstrual and postabortal insertion of a copper IUD or a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.
Suvisaari J; Lähteenmäki P
Contraception; 1996 Oct; 54(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 8922872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interventions for emergency contraception.
Shen J; Che Y; Showell E; Chen K; Cheng L
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 1(1):CD001324. PubMed ID: 30661244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interventions for emergency contraception.
Shen J; Che Y; Showell E; Chen K; Cheng L
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 8(8):CD001324. PubMed ID: 28766313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception.
Kaislasuo J; Heikinheimo O; Lähteenmäki P; Suhonen S
Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25990577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs), versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy.
French R; Cowan F; Mansour D; Morris S; Hughes D; Robinson A; Proctor T; Summerbell C; Logan S; Guillebaud J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (2):CD001776. PubMed ID: 11406007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acceptability of an experimental intracervical device: results of a study controlling for selection bias.
Shain RN; Ratsula K; Toivonen J; Lähteenmäki P; Luukkainen T; Holden AE; Rosenthal M
Contraception; 1989 Jan; 39(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 2491982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intrauterine devices. The optimal long-term contraceptive method?
Fortney JA; Feldblum PJ; Raymond EG
J Reprod Med; 1999 Mar; 44(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 10202746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: a randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices.
Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz J; Diaz MM; Faundes A; el Mahgoub S; Diaz S; Pavez M; Coutinho E; Mattos CE
Contraception; 1987 Mar; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 3111785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interventions to prevent or treat heavy menstrual bleeding or pain associated with intrauterine-device use.
Christelle K; Norhayati MN; Jaafar SH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Aug; 8(8):CD006034. PubMed ID: 36017945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Emergency contraception with a copper IUD or oral levonorgestrel: an observational study of 1-year pregnancy rates.
Turok DK; Jacobson JC; Dermish AI; Simonsen SE; Gurtcheff S; McFadden M; Murphy PA
Contraception; 2014 Mar; 89(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 24332433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preference for and efficacy of oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception with concomitant placement of a levonorgestrel IUD: a prospective cohort study.
Turok DK; Sanders JN; Thompson IS; Royer PA; Eggebroten J; Gawron LM
Contraception; 2016 Jun; 93(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 26944863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interventions for emergency contraception.
Cheng L; Che Y; Gülmezoglu AM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Aug; (8):CD001324. PubMed ID: 22895920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
