These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36847756)
1. Deep Learning-Based Acceleration of Compressed Sensing for Noncontrast-Enhanced Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. Wu X; Deng L; Li W; Peng P; Yue X; Tang L; Pu Q; Ming Y; Zhang X; Huang X; Chen Y; Huang J; Sun J J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Nov; 58(5):1521-1530. PubMed ID: 36847756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of accelerated non-contrast-enhanced whole-heart bSSFP coronary MR angiography by deep learning-constrained compressed sensing. Wu X; Tang L; Li W; He S; Yue X; Peng P; Wu T; Zhang X; Wu Z; He Y; Chen Y; Huang J; Sun J Eur Radiol; 2023 Nov; 33(11):8180-8190. PubMed ID: 37209126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noncontrast Self-navigated Free-breathing MR Angiography versus CT Angiography: A Prospective Study in Pediatric Patients with Suspected Anomalous Coronary Arteries. Albrecht MH; Varga-Szemes A; Schoepf UJ; Nance JW; De Cecco CN; De Santis D; Tesche C; Eid MH; Penmetsa M; Lesslie VW; Piccini D; Goeller M; Wichmann JL; Vogl TJ; Chowdhury SM; Nutting A; Hlavacek AM Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):1309-1317. PubMed ID: 30655052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of Noncontrast Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Lower Extremity MR Angiography Versus CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography. Varga-Szemes A; Wichmann JL; Schoepf UJ; Suranyi P; De Cecco CN; Muscogiuri G; Caruso D; Yamada RT; Litwin SE; Tesche C; Duguay TM; Giri S; Vliegenthart R; Todoran TM JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 10(10 Pt A):1116-1124. PubMed ID: 28109932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical Application of Non-Contrast-Enhanced Dixon Water-Fat Separation Compressed SENSE Whole-Heart Coronary MR Angiography at 3.0 T With and Without Nitroglycerin. Lu H; Zhao S; Tian D; Yang S; Ma J; Chen Y; Ge M; Zeng M; Jin H J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Feb; 55(2):579-591. PubMed ID: 34254384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unenhanced Whole-Heart Coronary MRA: Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of 1.5-T SSFP and 3-T Dixon Water-Fat Separation GRE Methods Using Coronary Angiography as Reference. Tian D; Zhao SH; Wang Y; Lu HF; Chen YY; Guo JJ; Ma JY; Chen ZW; Zeng MS; Jin H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Aug; 219(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 35293232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-contrast MR angiography using three-dimensional balanced steady-state free-precession imaging for evaluation of stenosis in the celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery: a preliminary comparative study with computed tomography angiography. Cardia PP; Penachim TJ; Prando A; Torres US; D'Ippólito G Br J Radiol; 2017 Jul; 90(1075):20170011. PubMed ID: 28590771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accelerated 3D whole-heart non-contrast-enhanced mDIXON coronary MR angiography using deep learning-constrained compressed sensing reconstruction. Wu X; Yue X; Peng P; Tan X; Huang F; Cai L; Li L; He S; Zhang X; Liu P; Sun J Insights Imaging; 2024 Sep; 15(1):224. PubMed ID: 39298070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An international multicenter comparison of time-SLIP unenhanced MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT angiography for assessing renal artery stenosis: the renal artery contrast-free trial. Albert TS; Akahane M; Parienty I; Yellin N; Catalá V; Alomar X; Prot A; Tomizawa N; Xue H; Katabathina VS; Lopera JE; Jin Z AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 25539255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of whole heart coronary MR angiography using free-breathing 3D balanced turbo-field-echo with SENSE and the half-fourier acquisition technique. Kim YJ; Seo JS; Choi BW; Choe KO; Jang Y; Ko YG Korean J Radiol; 2006; 7(4):235-42. PubMed ID: 17143026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noncontrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography of the whole chest using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: comparison with single-phase 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Krishnam MS; Tomasian A; Deshpande V; Tran L; Laub G; Finn JP; Ruehm SG Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 18496046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography. Villablanca JP; Nael K; Habibi R; Nael A; Laub G; Finn JP Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):799-805. PubMed ID: 17035870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: value for the detection of coronary artery stenoses in comparison to multislice computed tomography angiography. Maintz D; Ozgun M; Hoffmeier A; Quante M; Fischbach R; Manning WJ; Heindel W; Botnar RM Acta Radiol; 2007 Nov; 48(9):967-73. PubMed ID: 17957510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Value of Noncontrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography for the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Cartesian Balanced Steady-State Free Precession. Salehi Ravesh M; Tesch K; Lebenatus A; Koktzoglou I; Edelman RR; Eden M; Langguth P; Graessner J; Jansen O; Both M J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Nov; 52(5):1510-1524. PubMed ID: 32537799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Performance of a Lower-dose Contrast-Enhanced 4D Dynamic MR Angiography of the Lower Extremities at 3 T Using Multisegmental Time-Resolved Maximum Intensity Projections. Raczeck P; Fries P; Massmann A; Minko P; Frenzel F; Woerner T; Buecker A; Schneider GK J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Sep; 54(3):763-774. PubMed ID: 33825259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical comparison of sub-mm high-resolution non-contrast coronary CMR angiography against coronary CT angiography in patients with low-intermediate risk of coronary artery disease: a single center trial. Hajhosseiny R; Rashid I; Bustin A; Munoz C; Cruz G; Nazir MS; Grigoryan K; Ismail TF; Preston R; Neji R; Kunze K; Razavi R; Chiribiri A; Masci PG; Rajani R; Prieto C; Botnar RM J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 May; 23(1):57. PubMed ID: 33993890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deep learning powered coronary CT angiography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease: The effect of reader experience, calcification and image quality. Liu CY; Tang CX; Zhang XL; Chen S; Xie Y; Zhang XY; Qiao HY; Zhou CS; Xu PP; Lu MJ; Li JH; Lu GM; Zhang LJ Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 142():109835. PubMed ID: 34237493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of coronary artery disease using magnetic resonance coronary angiography: a national multicenter trial. Kato S; Kitagawa K; Ishida N; Ishida M; Nagata M; Ichikawa Y; Katahira K; Matsumoto Y; Seo K; Ochiai R; Kobayashi Y; Sakuma H J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Sep; 56(12):983-91. PubMed ID: 20828652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical feasibility study of 3D intracranial magnetic resonance angiography using compressed sensing. Lin Z; Zhang X; Guo L; Wang K; Jiang Y; Hu X; Huang Y; Wei J; Ma S; Liu Y; Zhu L; Zhuo Z; Liu J; Wang X J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Dec; 50(6):1843-1851. PubMed ID: 30980468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]