These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36848143)

  • 1. Disentangling Different Aspects of Change in Tests with the D-Diffusion Model.
    Ranger J; Wolgast A; Much S; Mutak A; Krause R; Pohl S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(5):1039-1055. PubMed ID: 36848143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Limited information estimation of the diffusion-based item response theory model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Szardenings C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 May; 69(2):122-38. PubMed ID: 26853083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Response Times to Model Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits.
    Pohl S; Ulitzsch E; von Davier M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):892-920. PubMed ID: 31054065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Latent variable sdelection in multidimensional item response theory models using the expectation model selection algorithm.
    Xu PF; Shang L; Zheng QZ; Shan N; Tang ML
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 May; 75(2):363-394. PubMed ID: 34918834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asymptotic Posterior Normality of Multivariate Latent Traits in an IRT Model.
    Kornely MJK; Kateri M
    Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):1146-1172. PubMed ID: 35149979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysing model fit of psychometric process models: An overview, a new test and an application to the diffusion model.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Szardenings C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):209-224. PubMed ID: 28474770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robust Measurement via A Fused Latent and Graphical Item Response Theory Model.
    Chen Y; Li X; Liu J; Ying Z
    Psychometrika; 2018 Sep; 83(3):538-562. PubMed ID: 29532405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Latent Space Diffusion Item Response Theory Model to Explore Conditional Dependence between Responses and Response Times.
    Kang I; Jeon M; Partchev I
    Psychometrika; 2023 Sep; 88(3):830-864. PubMed ID: 37316615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Attention-Based Diffusion Model for Psychometric Analyses.
    Boehm U; Marsman M; van der Maas HLJ; Maris G
    Psychometrika; 2021 Dec; 86(4):938-972. PubMed ID: 34258714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Differential Rater Functioning in Latent Classes with New Mixture Facets Models.
    Jin KY; Wang WC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):391-402. PubMed ID: 28328280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Test-Taking Motivation in Education Students: Task Battery Order Affected Within-Test-Taker Effort and Importance.
    Wolgast A; Schmidt N; Ranger J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():559683. PubMed ID: 33324277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling Changes in Response Style with Longitudinal IRTree Models.
    Ames AJ; Leventhal BC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(5):859-878. PubMed ID: 34061692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian Inference for IRT Models with Non-Normal Latent Trait Distributions.
    Zhang X; Wang C; Weiss DJ; Tao J
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(5):703-723. PubMed ID: 32598188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimum Distance Estimation of Multidimensional Diffusion-Based Item Response Theory Models.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Szardenings C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(6):941-957. PubMed ID: 32019358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Doubly Latent Space Joint Model for Local Item and Person Dependence in the Analysis of Item Response Data.
    Jin IH; Jeon M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):236-260. PubMed ID: 29987708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Response Times and Response Accuracy to Measure Fluency Within Cognitive Diagnosis Models.
    Wang S; Chen Y
    Psychometrika; 2020 Sep; 85(3):600-629. PubMed ID: 32816238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Joint Modeling of Compensatory Multidimensional Item Responses and Response Times.
    Man K; Harring JR; Jiao H; Zhan P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Nov; 43(8):639-654. PubMed ID: 31551641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rasch Model Parameter Estimation in the Presence of a Nonnormal Latent Trait Using a Nonparametric Bayesian Approach.
    Finch H; Edwards JM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Aug; 76(4):662-684. PubMed ID: 29795882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal Bayesian Adaptive Design for Test-Item Calibration.
    van der Linden WJ; Ren H
    Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):263-88. PubMed ID: 24407735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive psychology meets psychometric theory: on the relation between process models for decision making and latent variable models for individual differences.
    van der Maas HLJ; Molenaar D; Maris G; Kievit RA; Borsboom D
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):339-356. PubMed ID: 21401290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.