These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36848653)

  • 21. Abortion and informed consent requirements.
    Kapp MB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Sep; 144(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7114096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Addressing Moral Distress After Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization : A Professional Virtues-Based Approach.
    Chen R; Gordon M; Chervenak F; Coverdale J
    Acad Med; 2024 Jan; 99(1):12-15. PubMed ID: 37816216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Obstacles to Care Mount 1 Year After Dobbs Decision.
    Verma N; Grossman D
    JAMA; 2023 Jul; 330(2):119-120. PubMed ID: 37351896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Potential consequences of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.
    Davis KC; Fortino BR; O'Shea NG
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2024 Mar; 38(2):161-166. PubMed ID: 38451697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.
    Rader B; Upadhyay UD; Sehgal NKR; Reis BY; Brownstein JS; Hswen Y
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(20):2041-2047. PubMed ID: 36318194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Dobbs Decision and Undergraduate Medical Education: The Unintended Consequences and Strategies to Optimize Reproductive Health and a Competent Workforce for the Future.
    Stephenson-Famy A; Sonn T; Baecher-Lind L; Bhargava R; Chen KT; Fleming A; Kang Morgan H; Morosky CM; Schaffir JA; Madani Sims S; Sutton JM; Royce CS;
    Acad Med; 2023 Apr; 98(4):431-435. PubMed ID: 36347017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The importance of professional responsibility and fetal viability in the management of abortion.
    Chervenak F; McLeod-Sordjan R; Moreno JD; Pollet S; Bornstein E; Dudenhausen J; Grünebaum A
    J Perinat Med; 2024 Mar; 52(3):249-254. PubMed ID: 38342778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Provision of Abortion Care via Telehealth in the United States: A Rapid Review.
    Brown C; Neerland CE; Weinfurter EV; Saftner MA
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2023; 68(6):744-758. PubMed ID: 38069588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Post-Roe Political Landscape Demands a Morality of Caution for Women's Health.
    Goodday S; Karlin D; Suver C; Friend S
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Oct; 24(10):e41417. PubMed ID: 36264611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Protecting Health after Dobbs.
    Clark BR
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Nov; 52(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 36537270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. "Post-
    Rice WS; Narasimhan S; Newton-Levinson A; Pringle J; Redd SK; Evans DP
    Health Educ Behav; 2022 Dec; 49(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 36172995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The "gag rule" revisited: physicians as abortion gatekeepers.
    Bloche MG
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 11651561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.
    Sneed RC; May WL; Stencel C
    Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e612-25. PubMed ID: 15520092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The United States Supreme Court ruling and women's reproductive rights - A position statement issued by The European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG).
    Louwen F; Mukhopadhyay S; Mahmood T; Martins NN; Tarlatzis B;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Dec; 279():130-131. PubMed ID: 36334375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Health Equity in a Post 'Roe Versus Wade' America.
    Byron JJ; Avalos M; Xiao KA; Klein AA; Leheste JR
    Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32100. PubMed ID: 36601141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
    Koslov TI
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy.
    Benshoof J
    Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.