These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36848703)

  • 1. How many seconds was that? Teaching children about time does not refine their ability to track durations.
    Hamamouche KA; Cordes S
    Cognition; 2023 Jun; 235():105410. PubMed ID: 36848703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children's mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of number.
    Mundy E; Gilmore CK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Aug; 103(4):490-502. PubMed ID: 19327782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning about time: Knowledge of formal timing symbols is related to individual differences in temporal precision.
    Hamamouche K; Cordes S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):117-126. PubMed ID: 31021117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Training nonsymbolic proportional reasoning in children and its effects on their symbolic math abilities.
    Gouet C; Carvajal S; Halberda J; Peña M
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104154. PubMed ID: 31945678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Symbolic arithmetic knowledge without instruction.
    Gilmore CK; McCarthy SE; Spelke ES
    Nature; 2007 May; 447(7144):589-91. PubMed ID: 17538620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Foundations of children's numerical and mathematical skills: the roles of symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of numerical magnitude.
    Lyons IM; Ansari D
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2015; 48():93-116. PubMed ID: 25735942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cortical representations of numbers and nonsymbolic quantities expand and segregate in children from 5 to 8 years of age.
    Nakai T; Girard C; Longo L; Chesnokova H; Prado J
    PLoS Biol; 2023 Jan; 21(1):e3001935. PubMed ID: 36603025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive factors affecting children's nonsymbolic and symbolic magnitude judgment abilities: A latent profile analysis.
    Chew CS; Forte JD; Reeve RA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Dec; 152():173-191. PubMed ID: 27560661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numerical approximation abilities correlate with and predict informal but not formal mathematics abilities.
    Libertus ME; Feigenson L; Halberda J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Dec; 116(4):829-38. PubMed ID: 24076381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trajectories of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude Processing in the First Year of Formal Schooling.
    Matejko AA; Ansari D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0149863. PubMed ID: 26930195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working memory and number line representations in single-digit addition: Approximate versus exact, nonsymbolic versus symbolic.
    Xenidou-Dervou I; van der Schoot M; van Lieshout EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1148-67. PubMed ID: 25337863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Number symbols are processed more automatically than nonsymbolic numerical magnitudes: Findings from a Symbolic-Nonsymbolic Stroop task.
    Sokolowski HM; Hawes Z; Leibovich-Raveh T; Ansari D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Aug; 228():103644. PubMed ID: 35749820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Approximate multiplication in young children prior to multiplication instruction.
    Qu C; Szkudlarek E; Brannon EM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Jul; 207():105116. PubMed ID: 33677334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The developmental relationship between nonsymbolic and symbolic fraction abilities.
    Lv J; Mao H; Zeng L; Wang X; Zhou X; Mou Y
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2023 Aug; 232():105666. PubMed ID: 37043876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive predictors of children's development in mathematics achievement: A latent growth modeling approach.
    Xenidou-Dervou I; Van Luit JEH; Kroesbergen EH; Friso-van den Bos I; Jonkman LM; van der Schoot M; van Lieshout ECDM
    Dev Sci; 2018 Nov; 21(6):e12671. PubMed ID: 29691952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Varieties of quantity estimation in children.
    Sella F; Berteletti I; Lucangeli D; Zorzi M
    Dev Psychol; 2015 Jun; 51(6):758-70. PubMed ID: 26010388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward exact number: young children use one-to-one correspondence to measure set identity but not numerical equality.
    Izard V; Streri A; Spelke ES
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Jul; 72():27-53. PubMed ID: 24680885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A two-minute paper-and-pencil test of symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitude processing explains variability in primary school children's arithmetic competence.
    Nosworthy N; Bugden S; Archibald L; Evans B; Ansari D
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e67918. PubMed ID: 23844126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cerebral basis of mapping nonsymbolic numerical quantities onto abstract symbols: an fMRI training study.
    Lyons IM; Ansari D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1720-35. PubMed ID: 18823231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Continuous visual properties of number influence the formation of novel symbolic representations.
    Merkley R; Scerif G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1860-70. PubMed ID: 25622722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.