These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36849368)

  • 1. 12 Month's Assessment Of Clinical Efficacy Of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement And Flowable Composites In Restoration Of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions, A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Saghir A; Rehman T; Irum B; Afreen Z; ; Nawaz FN
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2023; 35(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 36849368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of silver diamine fluoride on the microleakage of flowable resin composite and glass ionomer cement restorations to carious primary dentin: an-in vitro study.
    Osama S; Badran AS; Awad BG
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):91. PubMed ID: 38229047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up.
    Hussainy SN; Nasim I; Thomas T; Ranjan M
    J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(5):510-515. PubMed ID: 30294112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. One-year evaluation of a new restorative glass ionomer cement for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions in patients with systemic diseases: a randomized, clinical trial.
    Oz FD; Meral E; Ergİn E; Gurgan S
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20200311. PubMed ID: 33111883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
    Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-year evaluation of different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: a randomized clinical trial.
    Gonçalves DFM; Shinohara MS; Carvalho PRMA; Ramos FSES; Oliveira LC; Omoto ÉM; Fagundes TC
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2021; 29():e20210192. PubMed ID: 34705986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Dent Mater; 1998 Jul; 14(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 10379259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of New Alkasite Based Restorative Material for Restoring Non- Carious Cervical Lesions- Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Ballal NV; Jalan P; Rai N; Al-Haj Husain N; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2023 Feb; 31(1):72-77. PubMed ID: 35659319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious class V lesions.
    Ozgünaltay G; Onen A
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Nov; 29(11):1037-41. PubMed ID: 12453256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The marginal seal of a flowable composite, an injectable resin modified glass ionomer and a compomer in primary molars--an in vitro study.
    Prabhakar AR; Madan M; Raju OS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 14700335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical comparison of a micro-hybride resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions: 36-month, split-mouth, randomized clinical trial.
    Koc Vural U; Kerimova L; Kiremitci A
    Odontology; 2021 Apr; 109(2):376-384. PubMed ID: 32902766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Effectiveness of a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and a Mild One-step Self-etch Adhesive Applied Actively and Passively in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: An 18-Month Clinical Trial.
    Jassal M; Mittal S; Tewari S
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):581-592. PubMed ID: 29782222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dias AGA; Magno MB; Delbem ACB; Cunha RF; Maia LC; Pessan JP
    J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():1-13. PubMed ID: 29649506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.