These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36849368)

  • 21. Clinical evaluation of a nanohybrid and a flowable resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions: 24-month results.
    Karaman E; Yazici AR; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
    J Adhes Dent; 2012 Aug; 14(5):485-92. PubMed ID: 22724113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations - An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters.
    Heintze SD; Loguercio AD; Hanzen TA; Reis A; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):e109-e135. PubMed ID: 35221127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical evaluation of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Adeleke ; Oginni A
    J West Afr Coll Surg; 2012 Oct; 2(4):21-37. PubMed ID: 25453001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani ; Zilm PS; Gully NJ
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17969286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Two-year clinical evaluation of resinous restorative systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Santiago SL; Passos VF; Vieira AH; Navarro MF; Lauris JR; Franco EB
    Braz Dent J; 2010; 21(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 21203706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sixty-month follow up of three different universal adhesives used with a highly-filled flowable resin composite in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesion.
    Oz FD; Ozturk C; Soleimani R; Gurgan S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Aug; 26(8):5377-5387. PubMed ID: 35477817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microcavitated (ICDAS 3) carious lesion arrest with resin or glass ionomer sealants in first permanent molars: A randomized controlled trial.
    Muñoz-Sandoval C; Gambetta-Tessini K; Giacaman RA
    J Dent; 2019 Sep; 88():103163. PubMed ID: 31276747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Three-year clinical evaluation of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorations in non-carious cervical lesions: a randomised controlled split-mouth clinical trial.
    Celik EU; Tunac AT; Yilmaz F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Mar; 23(3):1473-1480. PubMed ID: 30120605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Loguercio AD; Reis A; Barbosa AN; Roulet JF
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of head and neck radiotherapy on the longevity of dental adhesive restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Palmier NR; Madrid Troconis CC; Normando AGC; Guerra ENS; Araújo ALD; Arboleda LPA; Fonsêca JM; de Pauli Paglioni M; Gomes-Silva W; Vechiato Filho AJ; González-Arriagada WA; Paes Leme AF; Prado-Ribeiro AC; Brandão TB; de Goes MF; Lopes MA; Santos-Silva AR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):886-896. PubMed ID: 33715834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Eight-year clinical evaluation of two types of resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Kaida K; Kubo S; Egoshi T; Taira Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6327-6337. PubMed ID: 35751704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An 18-month clinical evaluation of three different universal adhesives used with a universal flowable composite resin in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions.
    Oz FD; Kutuk ZB; Ozturk C; Soleimani R; Gurgan S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Mar; 23(3):1443-1452. PubMed ID: 30109443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of flowable composites on the clinical performance of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Szesz A; Parreiras S; Martini E; Reis A; Loguercio A
    J Dent; 2017 Oct; 65():11-21. PubMed ID: 28729119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.