These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36849759)

  • 1. How does searching for faces among similar-looking distractors affect distractor memory?
    McKinley GL; Peterson DJ; Hout MC
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1404-1415. PubMed ID: 36849759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low cognitive load strengthens distractor interference while high load attenuates when cognitive load and distractor possess similar visual characteristics.
    Minamoto T; Shipstead Z; Osaka N; Engle RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1659-73. PubMed ID: 25813738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Target familiarity and visual working memory do not influence familiarity effect in visual search.
    Guo Z; Niu M; Wang Q
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):7560. PubMed ID: 33828108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eye tracking the face in the crowd task: why are angry faces found more quickly?
    Shasteen JR; Sasson NJ; Pinkham AE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93914. PubMed ID: 24699880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?
    Rajsic J; Woodman GF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):269-279. PubMed ID: 30937674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incidental recognition reveals attentional tradeoffs shaped by categorical similarity.
    Lavelle M; Luria R; Drew T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jun; 49(6):893-906. PubMed ID: 37276126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual search asymmetry depends on target-distractor feature similarity: Is the asymmetry simply a result of distractor rejection speed?
    Zhang YR; Onyper S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 31359376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distractor similarity and category variability effects in search.
    Robbins A; Evdokimov A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Oct; 86(7):2231-2250. PubMed ID: 38982007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-target cost in visual search for multiple unfamiliar faces.
    Mestry N; Menneer T; Cave KR; Godwin HJ; Donnelly N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1504-1519. PubMed ID: 28368160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of visual working memory capacity on the filtering efficiency of emotional face distractors.
    Ye C; Xu Q; Liu Q; Cong F; Saariluoma P; Ristaniemi T; Astikainen P
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Oct; 138():63-72. PubMed ID: 30125615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sustained conscious access to incidental memories in RSVP.
    Matthews J; Wu J; Corneille V; Hohwy J; van Boxtel J; Tsuchiya N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):188-204. PubMed ID: 30291551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
    Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Activated long-term memory and visual working memory during hybrid visual search: Effects on target memory search and distractor memory.
    Saltzmann SM; Eich B; Moen KC; Beck MR
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Nov; 52(8):2156-2171. PubMed ID: 38528298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oculomotor capture by search-irrelevant features in visual working memory: on the crucial role of target-distractor similarity.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2379-2392. PubMed ID: 32166644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term memory for distractors: Effects of involuntary attention from working memory.
    Moriya J
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Feb; 52(2):401-416. PubMed ID: 37768481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Target-distractor similarity predicts visual search efficiency but only for highly similar features.
    Chapman AF; Störmer VS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Aug; 86(6):1872-1882. PubMed ID: 39251566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of encoding instruction and opportunity on the recollection of behaviourally relevant events.
    Broitman AW; Swallow KM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 May; 73(5):711-725. PubMed ID: 31747827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template.
    Geng JJ; DiQuattro NE; Helm J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1993-2007. PubMed ID: 28425732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of facial distinctiveness in the prioritisation of targets in disjunctive dual-target face search.
    Smillie E; Mestry N; Clark D; Harrison N; Donnelly N
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Sep; 9(1):62. PubMed ID: 39269590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.