BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36849794)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of risk-based breast cancer screening in Urban Hebei Province.
    Shi J; Guan Y; Liang D; Li D; He Y; Liu Y
    Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):3370. PubMed ID: 36849794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Health Quality Ontario
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2016; 16(15):1-71. PubMed ID: 27468326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of risk-based breast cancer screening programme, China.
    Sun L; Legood R; Sadique Z; Dos-Santos-Silva I; Yang L
    Bull World Health Organ; 2018 Aug; 96(8):568-577. PubMed ID: 30104797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Women at Familial Risk.
    Geuzinge HA; Obdeijn IM; Rutgers EJT; Saadatmand S; Mann RM; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RAEM; de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW; Lobbes MBI; van 't Riet M; Hooning MJ; Ausems MGEM; Loo CE; Wesseling J; Luiten EJT; Zonderland HM; Verhoef C; Heijnsdijk EAM; Tilanus-Linthorst MMA; de Koning HJ;
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 32729887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.
    Pataky R; Ismail Z; Coldman AJ; Elwood M; Gelmon K; Hedden L; Hislop G; Kan L; McCoy B; Olivotto IA; Peacock S
    J Med Screen; 2014 Dec; 21(4):180-8. PubMed ID: 25186116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
    Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incorporating Baseline Breast Density When Screening Women at Average Risk for Breast Cancer : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Shih YT; Dong W; Xu Y; Etzioni R; Shen Y
    Ann Intern Med; 2021 May; 174(5):602-612. PubMed ID: 33556275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Updated Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines for Average-Risk Women.
    Tina Shih YC; Dong W; Xu Y; Shen Y
    Value Health; 2019 Feb; 22(2):185-193. PubMed ID: 30711063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should women with a BRCA1/2 mutation aged 60 and older be offered intensified breast cancer screening? - A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Obdeijn IM; Oosterwijk JC; Feenstra TL; Houssami N; de Bock GH
    Breast; 2019 Jun; 45():82-88. PubMed ID: 30904701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Total cost-effectiveness of mammography screening strategies.
    Mittmann N; Stout NK; Lee P; Tosteson AN; Trentham-Dietz A; Alagoz O; Yaffe MJ
    Health Rep; 2015 Dec; 26(12):16-25. PubMed ID: 26676235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Breast Cancer Screening Using Mammography in Singapore: A Modeling Study.
    Chootipongchaivat S; Wong XY; Ten Haaf K; Hartman M; Tan KB; van Ravesteyn NT; Wee HL
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2021 Apr; 30(4):653-660. PubMed ID: 33531436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finding the optimal mammography screening strategy: A cost-effectiveness analysis of 920 modelled strategies.
    Kregting LM; Sankatsing VDV; Heijnsdijk EAM; de Koning HJ; van Ravesteyn NT
    Int J Cancer; 2022 Jul; 151(2):287-296. PubMed ID: 35285018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cost-effectiveness of multiple screening modalities on breast cancer in Chinese women from Shanghai].
    Wu F; Mo M; Qin XX; Fang H; Zhao GM; Liu GY; Chen YY; Cao ZG; Yan YJ; Lyu LL; Xu WH; Shao ZM
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 38(12):1665-1671. PubMed ID: 29294584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population.
    Moore SG; Shenoy PJ; Fanucchi L; Tumeh JW; Flowers CR
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Jan; 9():9. PubMed ID: 19144138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Breast cancer screening in urban Beijing, 2014-2019].
    Yang L; Zhang X; Liu S; Li HC; Zhang Q; Wang N; Ji JF
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 54(9):974-980. PubMed ID: 32907288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The cost-effectiveness of adding tomosynthesis to mammography-based breast cancer screening: an economic analysis.
    Cressman S; Mar C; Sam J; Kan L; Lohrisch C; Spinelli JJ
    CMAJ Open; 2021; 9(2):E443-E450. PubMed ID: 33888549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of specificity on cost-effectiveness of screening women at high risk of breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging, mammography and ultrasound.
    Kaiser CG; Dietzel M; Vag T; Rübenthaler J; Froelich MF; Tollens F
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 137():109576. PubMed ID: 33556759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-resolution microendoscopy for esophageal cancer screening in China: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Hur C; Choi SE; Kong CY; Wang GQ; Xu H; Polydorides AD; Xue LY; Perzan KE; Tramontano AC; Richards-Kortum RR; Anandasabapathy S
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(18):5513-23. PubMed ID: 25987774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast MRI screening for average-risk women: A monte carlo simulation cost-benefit analysis.
    Mango VL; Goel A; Mema E; Kwak E; Ha R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e216-e221. PubMed ID: 30632645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.