These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3685096)

  • 1. Experimental examination of videodensitometry of large opacifications in digital subtraction angiography.
    Maher KP; O'Connor MK; Malone JF
    Phys Med Biol; 1987 Oct; 32(10):1273-82. PubMed ID: 3685096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a digital videodensitometric program analysis for measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction.
    Gaux JC; Vuthien H; Letienne G; Angel CY; Pernes JM; Raynaud A; Brenot P
    Br J Radiol; 1987 Jul; 60(715):693-9. PubMed ID: 3304510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In-vivo validation of videodensitometric coronary cross-sectional area measurement using dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    Molloi S; Ersahin A; Hicks J; Wallis J
    Int J Card Imaging; 1995 Dec; 11(4):223-31. PubMed ID: 8596060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Digital peripheral angiography with pace shifting and subtraction. Comparison with the standard procedure].
    Hilbertz T; Fink U; Beck R; Berger H; Eberwein U
    Rofo; 1991 Sep; 155(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 1912540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Quantitative analysis of the left ventricular volume curve by digital subtraction angiography].
    Ikeda H
    J Cardiol Suppl; 1987; 15():27-33. PubMed ID: 3334250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A procedure for taking into account scattered radiation and scattered light in the densitometric determination of intravascular iodine content].
    Schüller H; Leipner N; Rollmann O; Harder T
    Rofo; 1987 Aug; 147(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 2819981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. X-ray videodensitometric methods for blood flow and velocity measurement: a critical review of literature.
    Shpilfoygel SD; Close RA; Valentino DJ; Duckwiler GR
    Med Phys; 2000 Sep; 27(9):2008-23. PubMed ID: 11011728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Image signals of digital subtraction angiography in a videodensitometric method].
    Katsuragawa S; Ishikawa I; Takahashi T; Yanagisawa T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Jan; 46(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 3517807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography.
    Zhang LJ; Wu SY; Niu JB; Zhang ZL; Wang HZ; Zhao YE; Chai X; Zhou CS; Lu GM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20028901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative digital subtraction angiography: two scanning techniques for correction of scattered radiation and veiling glare. Work in progress.
    Shaw CG; Plewes DB
    Radiology; 1985 Oct; 157(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 3898220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation dose implications of digital angiographic systems.
    Hynes DM; Gershater R; Edmonds EW; Rowlands JA; Baranoski D; Turow DG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Aug; 143(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 6377858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital subtraction angiography: principles and pitfalls of image improvement techniques.
    Levin DC; Schapiro RM; Boxt LM; Dunham L; Harrington DP; Ergun DL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Sep; 143(3):447-54. PubMed ID: 6380244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. 2. Computerized determination of vessel sizes in digital subtraction angiography.
    Fujita H; Doi K; Fencil LE; Chua KG
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(4):549-56. PubMed ID: 3626994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography using videodensitometry. An in vivo analysis.
    Simons MA; Muskett AD; Kruger RA; Klausner SC; Burton NA; Nelson JA
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Feb; 23(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 3277924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Validity testing of time-density curves in determining the degree of arterial stenosis by DSA].
    Köhler D; Langer M; Spanger C
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1989 Mar; 9(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 2650955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Videodensitometric analysis of venous digital angiography of the left ventricle: application to the measurement of the ventricular ejection fraction and volumes].
    Brenot P; Angel CY; Vuthien H; Letienne G; Gaux JC
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1988 Apr; 36(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 3287304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Equipment and methodologic parameters of radiation exposure in digital subtraction angiography].
    Neufang KF; Ewen K
    Rontgenblatter; 1989 Apr; 42(4):180-6. PubMed ID: 2652271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative coronary angiography using image recovery techniques for background estimation in unsubtracted images.
    Wong JT; Kamyar F; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):4003-15. PubMed ID: 17985646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of single plane videodensitometry-based right ventricular ejection fraction in right and left anterior oblique views to biplane geometry-based right ventricular ejection fraction.
    Cohen M; Monsen C; Francis X; Sherman W; Ambrose JA; Teichholz LE; Fuster V
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1987 Jul; 10(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 3298359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital subtraction angiography of the carotid arteries: a comparative study in 100 patients.
    Chilcote WA; Modic MT; Pavlicek WA; Little JR; Furlan AJ; Duchesneau PM; Weinstein MA
    Radiology; 1981 May; 139(2):287-95. PubMed ID: 7012921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.