177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36852476)
1. Biomechanical Analysis of Lark-Loop, Lasso-Loop and Krackow Suture Technique in Tenodesis.
Zhou M; Zhou C; Cui D; Long Y; Yan Y; Zheng Z; Meng K; Zhang J; Hou J; Yang R
Orthop Surg; 2023 Apr; 15(4):1136-1143. PubMed ID: 36852476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Double Krackow Suture Technique Does Not Offer a Significant Benefit Compared to the Krackow Suture Technique in Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using a Double-Loaded Suture Anchor.
Hong CK; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Chen Y; Hsu CC; Yeh ML; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2020 Mar; 36(3):701-707. PubMed ID: 31973990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical Analysis of All-Suture Suture Anchor Fixation Compared With Conventional Suture Anchors and Interference Screws for Biceps Tenodesis.
Frank RM; Bernardoni ED; Veera SS; Waterman BR; Griffin JW; Shewman EF; Cole BJ; Romeo AA; Verma NN
Arthroscopy; 2019 Jun; 35(6):1760-1768. PubMed ID: 31072716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long head biceps tenodesis with a knotless cinch suture anchor: a biomechanical analysis.
Kaback LA; Gowda AL; Paller D; Green A; Blaine T
Arthroscopy; 2015 May; 31(5):831-5. PubMed ID: 25660012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using Interconnected Knotless Anchor for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis Could Offer Improved Biomechanical Properties in a Cadaveric Model.
Kuan FC; Hsu KL; Yen JZ; Wen MJ; Yeh ML; Chen Y; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2020 Aug; 36(8):2047-2054. PubMed ID: 32259645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanical comparison of two arthroscopic suture techniques in biceps tenodesis: whip-stitch vs. simple suture techniques.
Agarwalla A; Puzzitiello RN; Leong NL; Shewman EF; Verma NN; Romeo AA; Forsythe B
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Aug; 28(8):1531-1536. PubMed ID: 30948215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanics of a novel technique for suprapectoral intraosseous biceps tenodesis.
Sampatacos N; Gillette BP; Snyder SJ; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Jan; 25(1):149-57. PubMed ID: 26344873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The modified finger-trap suture technique: a biomechanical comparison of a novel suture technique for graft fixation.
Su WR; Chu CH; Lin CL; Lin CJ; Jou IM; Chang CW
Arthroscopy; 2012 May; 28(5):702-10. PubMed ID: 22261138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopically performable techniques for suprapectoral biceps tenodesis.
Patzer T; Rundic JM; Bobrowitsch E; Olender GD; Hurschler C; Schofer MD
Arthroscopy; 2011 Aug; 27(8):1036-47. PubMed ID: 21704467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation.
Tashjian RZ; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1408-12. PubMed ID: 23415819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical Comparison of Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Onlay Techniques.
Lacheta L; Rosenberg SI; Brady AW; Dornan GJ; Millett PJ
Orthop J Sports Med; 2019 Oct; 7(10):2325967119876276. PubMed ID: 31663008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The new LassoLoop360° technique for biomechanically superior tissue grip.
Müller S; Flury R; Zimmermann S; de Wild M; Fogerty S; Lafosse L; Bongiorno V; Rosso C
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Dec; 27(12):3962-3969. PubMed ID: 31254030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biceps Tenodesis: Biomechanical Assessment of 3 Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Techniques.
Vestermark G; Hartigan D; Piasecki D; Fleischli J; Odum SM; Zheng N; D'Alessandro DF
Orthopedics; 2017 Nov; 40(6):e1009-e1016. PubMed ID: 28968479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Transtendinous All-Suture Anchor Technique Versus Interference Screw Technique for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model.
Hong CK; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Lin CL; Yeh ML; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2018 Jun; 34(6):1755-1761. PubMed ID: 29482858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Loop 'n' Tack Knot: Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Suture Technique for Proximal Biceps Tenodesis.
Acosta J; Rinaldi JM; Guth JJ; Akhavan S
Orthop J Sports Med; 2020 Sep; 8(9):2325967120952315. PubMed ID: 33015212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Superior biomechanical properties and tying time with the modified Prusik knot and Wittstein suture loop to the Krackow stitch.
Hong CK; Lin CL; Yang JM; Shih CA; Chou YC; Yeh ML; Chiang CH; Su WR
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Feb; 138(2):237-244. PubMed ID: 29075842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do Needleless Knots have Similar Strength as the Krackow Suture? An In Vitro Porcine Tendon Study.
Hong CK; Kuo TH; Yeh ML; Jou IM; Lin CL; Su WR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):552-557. PubMed ID: 27822894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Staple, Anchor, and Tenodesis Screw for Posterior Tibialis Tendon Fixation: A Biomechanical Analysis.
Aslan L; Gunerbuyuk C; Gedik CC; Sarabi MR; Kilicoglu O
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2024; 63(2):194-198. PubMed ID: 37935326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can a Two Simple Stitches Method Provide Secure Fixation Strength in Biceps Tenodesis?: Biomechanical Evaluation of Various Suture Techniques.
Kim TM; Shin MH; Baek S; Lee DR; Chung SW
Clin Orthop Surg; 2022 Sep; 14(3):426-433. PubMed ID: 36061853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of two techniques for arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: interference screw versus implant-free intraosseous tendon fixation.
Sampatacos N; Getelman MH; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Nov; 23(11):1731-9. PubMed ID: 24810080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
