116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36853200)
1. Consonant and vowel confusions in well-performing adult cochlear implant users, measured with a nonsense syllable repetition test.
Rødvik AK; Torkildsen JVK; Wie OB; Tvete O; Skaug I; Silvola JT
Int J Audiol; 2024 Apr; 63(4):260-268. PubMed ID: 36853200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consonant and Vowel Confusions in Well-Performing Children and Adolescents With Cochlear Implants, Measured by a Nonsense Syllable Repetition Test.
Rødvik AK; Tvete O; Torkildsen JVK; Wie OB; Skaug I; Silvola JT
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1813. PubMed ID: 31474900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consonant and Vowel Identification in Cochlear Implant Users Measured by Nonsense Words: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Rødvik AK; von Koss Torkildsen J; Wie OB; Storaker MA; Silvola JT
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Apr; 61(4):1023-1050. PubMed ID: 29623340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perception and confusion of speech sounds by adults with a cochlear implant.
Rødvik AK
Clin Linguist Phon; 2008; 22(4-5):371-8. PubMed ID: 18415737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phoneme recognition and confusions with multichannel cochlear implants: vowels.
Välimaa TT; Määttä TK; Löppönen HJ; Sorri MJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Oct; 45(5):1039-54. PubMed ID: 12381059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of consonant-vowel intensity ratio on loudness of monosyllabic words.
Orr SB; Montgomery AA; Healy EW; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3105-13. PubMed ID: 21110606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
Chen F; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phoneme recognition and confusions with multichannel cochlear implants: consonants.
Välimaa TT; Määttä TK; Löppönen HJ; Sorri MJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Oct; 45(5):1055-69. PubMed ID: 12381060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Concurrent-vowel and tone recognition by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
Luo X; Fu QJ; Wu HP; Hsu CJ
Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):75-84. PubMed ID: 19595753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling open-set spoken word recognition in postlingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: some preliminary results with the neighborhood activation model.
Meyer TA; Frisch SA; Pisoni DB; Miyamoto RT; Svirsky MA
Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jul; 24(4):612-20. PubMed ID: 12851554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vowel Production in Prelingually Deafened Mandarin-Speaking Children With Cochlear Implants.
Yang J; Xu L
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 64(2):664-682. PubMed ID: 33524265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intelligibility of Word-Initial Obstruent Consonants in Mandarin-Speaking Prelingually Deafened Children With Cochlear Implants.
Yang J; Wang X; Yu J; Xu L
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Jun; 66(6):2155-2176. PubMed ID: 37208163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and Evaluation of a Language-Independent Test of Auditory Discrimination for Referrals for Cochlear Implant Candidacy Assessment.
Ching TYC; Dillon H; Hou S; Seeto M; Sodan A; Chong-White N
Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 34812793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic and electrical pattern analysis of consonant perceptual cues used by cochlear implant users.
Teoh SW; Neuburger HS; Svirsky MA
Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(5):269-85. PubMed ID: 12904682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
Yang HI; Zeng FG
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
Prévost F; Lehmann A
Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imitation of nonwords by hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants: segmental analyses.
Dillon CM; Cleary M; Pisoni DB; Carter AK
Clin Linguist Phon; 2004; 18(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 15053267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vowel confusion patterns in adults during initial 4 years of implant use.
Välimaa TT; Sorri MJ; Laitakari J; Sivonen V; Muhli A
Clin Linguist Phon; 2011 Feb; 25(2):121-44. PubMed ID: 21070135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
