These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36853200)

  • 21. Vowel and consonant identification tests can be used to compare performances in a multilingual group of cochlear implant patients.
    Pelizzone M; Boëx C; Montandon P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1993; 55(6):341-6. PubMed ID: 8265119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cross-frequency integration for consonant and vowel identification in bimodal hearing.
    Kong YY; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):959-80. PubMed ID: 21060139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors affecting masking release in cochlear-implant vocoded speech.
    Li N; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):338-46. PubMed ID: 19603890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceptual development of nasal consonants in children with normal hearing and in children who use cochlear implants.
    Guillot KM; Ohde RN; Hedrick M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1133-43. PubMed ID: 23785183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Consonant production and language skills in Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants.
    Peng SC; Weiss AL; Cheung H; Lin YS
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):592-7. PubMed ID: 15148182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of following context on perception of the voiced-voiceless distinction in syllable-final stop consonants.
    Repp BH; Williams DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Aug; 78(2):445-57. PubMed ID: 4031246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A mathematical model of vowel identification by users of cochlear implants.
    Sagi E; Meyer TA; Kaiser AR; Teoh SW; Svirsky MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):1069-83. PubMed ID: 20136228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC; Poroy O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis.
    Dubno JR; Levitt H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jan; 69(1):249-61. PubMed ID: 7217523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception.
    Drullman R; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1053-64. PubMed ID: 8132899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vowel and consonant confusions from spectrally manipulated stimuli designed to simulate poor cochlear implant electrode-neuron interfaces.
    DiNino M; Wright RA; Winn MB; Bierer JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):4404. PubMed ID: 28039993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimization of programming parameters in children with the advanced bionics cochlear implant.
    Baudhuin J; Cadieux J; Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Maxson JL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):302-12. PubMed ID: 22533974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of spectrally asynchronous delays on consonant voicing perception.
    Ortmann AJ; Palmer CV; Pratt SR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Sep; 21(8):493-511. PubMed ID: 21034697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Discriminability and Perceptual Saliency of Temporal and Spectral Cues for Final Fricative Consonant Voicing in Simulated Cochlear-Implant and Bimodal Hearing.
    Kong YY; Winn MB; Poellmann K; Donaldson GS
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jun; 20():. PubMed ID: 27317666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Realisation of voicing by French-speaking CI children after long-term implant use: An acoustic study.
    Grandon B; Vilain A; Lœvenbruck H; Schmerber S; Truy E
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2017; 31(7-9):598-611. PubMed ID: 28362227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Phoneme recognition by deaf individuals using the multichannel nucleus cochlear implant.
    Mülder HE; Van Olphen AF; Bosman A; Smoorenburg GF
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992 Nov; 112(6):946-55. PubMed ID: 1481665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.