These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36853425)
1. Vertical ridge augmentation of atrophic posterior mandible with corticocancellous onlay symphysis graft versus sandwich technique: clinical and radiographic analysis. Fekry YE; Mahmoud NR Odontology; 2023 Oct; 111(4):993-1002. PubMed ID: 36853425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early volumetric changes after vertical augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block graft versus onlay bone graft: A retrospective radiological study. Barone A; Toti P; Menchini-Fabris GB; Felice P; Marchionni S; Covani U J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 45(9):1438-1447. PubMed ID: 28705523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Autogenous Inlay Graft vs Autogenous Onlay Graft for Anterior Maxillary Horizontal Ridge Augmentation: A Randomized Control Clinical Study. Elsayed AO; Abdel-Rahman FH; Ahmed WM; Tawfik MA J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Feb; 25(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 38514406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Autogenous interpositional block graft vs onlay graft for horizontal ridge augmentation in the mandible. Atef M; Osman AH; Hakam M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Aug; 21(4):678-685. PubMed ID: 31260166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with sandwich technique: bone block from the chin area versus corticocancellous bone block allograft--clinical and histological prospective randomized controlled study. Laino L; Iezzi G; Piattelli A; Lo Muzio L; Cicciù M Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():982104. PubMed ID: 24877155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of vertical ridge augmentation and marginal bone loss using autogenous onlay vs inlay grafting techniques with simultaneous implant placement in the anterior maxillary esthetic zone: A randomized clinical trial. El Zahwy M; Taha SAAK; Mounir R; Mounir M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Dec; 21(6):1140-1147. PubMed ID: 31743566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Augmentation in two stages of atrophic alveolar bone prior to dental rehabilitation: a case report. Zahrani AA J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Sep; 8(6):57-63. PubMed ID: 17846672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vertical ridge augmentation using sandwich osteotomy: 2 case reports. Kilic E; Alkan A; Ulu M; Zortuk M; Gumus HO Gen Dent; 2013; 61(6):e22-5. PubMed ID: 24064173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inlay versus onlay iliac bone grafting in atrophic posterior mandible: a prospective controlled clinical trial for the comparison of two techniques. Felice P; Pistilli R; Lizio G; Pellegrino G; Nisii A; Marchetti C Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Oct; 11 Suppl 1():e69-82. PubMed ID: 19681938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone. Felice P; Marchetti C; Piattelli A; Pellegrino G; Checchi V; Worthington H; Esposito M Eur J Oral Implantol; 2008; 1(3):183-98. PubMed ID: 20467621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical effects of ridge augmentation with the half-columnar shaped mandibular bone block for the placement of dental implants]. Tang ZH; Lv H; Cao MX; Wu MJ Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Feb; 42(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 20140053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cortical tenting technique versus onlay layered technique for vertical augmentation of atrophic posterior mandibles: a split-mouth pilot study. Morad G; Khojasteh A Implant Dent; 2013 Dec; 22(6):566-71. PubMed ID: 24185462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Atrophic ridge augmentation using intra-oral onlay bone grafts--expanding the limits]. Levin L; Ophir S; Schwartz-Arad D Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2006 Jan; 23(1):31-5, 70. PubMed ID: 16599331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Staged reconstruction of the severely atrophic mandible with autogenous bone graft and endosteal implants. Bell RB; Blakey GH; White RP; Hillebrand DG; Molina A J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Oct; 60(10):1135-41. PubMed ID: 12378486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deep-frozen allogeneic onlay bone grafts for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary alveolar ridges: a preliminary study. Barone A; Varanini P; Orlando B; Tonelli P; Covani U J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 67(6):1300-6. PubMed ID: 19446220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical results of alveolar ridge augmentation with mandibular block bone grafts in partially edentulous patients prior to implant placement. Cordaro L; Amadé DS; Cordaro M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Feb; 13(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 12005140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vertical Ridge Augmentation in the Atrophic Mandible: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Elnayef B; Monje A; Gargallo-Albiol J; Galindo-Moreno P; Wang HL; Hernández-Alfaro F Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):291-312. PubMed ID: 28291849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The use of autogenous block graft for augmentation of the atrophic alveolar ridge]. Kahn A; Shlomi B; Levy Y; Better H; Chaushu G Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2003 Jul; 20(3):54-64, 102. PubMed ID: 14515629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The repair of localized severe ridge defects for implant placement using mandibular bone grafts. Misch CM; Misch CE Implant Dent; 1995; 4(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 8603135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maxillary vertical alveolar ridge augmentation using sandwich osteotomy technique with simultaneous versus delayed implant placement: A proof of principle randomized clinical trial. Al-Dubai M; Mounir R; Ali S; Mounir M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 36239176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]