These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36853902)

  • 1. Agreement Between Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Bioelectric Impedance Analysis for Assessing Body Composition in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Dzator S; Weerasekara I; Shields M; Haslam R; James D
    Clin J Sport Med; 2023 Sep; 33(5):557-568. PubMed ID: 36853902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of multi- and single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of body composition in post-menopausal women: effects of body mass index and accelerometer-determined physical activity.
    Gába A; Kapuš O; Cuberek R; Botek M
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2015 Aug; 28(4):390-400. PubMed ID: 25039938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proportional bias between dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis varies based on sex in active adults consuming high- and low-carbohydrate diets.
    Tinsley GM
    Nutr Res; 2017 Jun; 42():85-100. PubMed ID: 28633874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fat-free mass prediction equations for bioelectric impedance analysis compared to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in obese adolescents: a validation study.
    Hofsteenge GH; Chinapaw MJ; Weijs PJ
    BMC Pediatr; 2015 Oct; 15():158. PubMed ID: 26471899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fat-Free Mass Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis as an Alternative to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Calculating Energy Availability in Female Adolescent Athletes.
    Ramos IE; Coelho GM; Lanzillotti HS; Marini E; Koury JC
    Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab; 2022 Sep; 32(5):350-358. PubMed ID: 35523421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of Bioelectric Impedance Analysis against Dual-energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Assessment of Body Composition in Indian Children Aged 5 to 18 Years.
    Chiplonkar S; Kajale N; Ekbote V; Mandlik R; Parthasarathy L; Khadilkar V; Khadilkar A
    Indian Pediatr; 2017 Nov; 54(11):919-924. PubMed ID: 28849765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in the Assessment of Body Composition in Women with Anorexia Nervosa upon Admission and Discharge from an Inpatient Specialist Unit.
    Abbaspour A; Reed KK; Hübel C; Bulik-Sullivan EC; Tang Q; Bulik CM; Carroll IM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(21):. PubMed ID: 34769915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Body composition assessment in adults with cystic fibrosis: comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance analysis.
    King S; Wilson J; Kotsimbos T; Bailey M; Nyulasi I
    Nutrition; 2005; 21(11-12):1087-94. PubMed ID: 16183254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in body composition during weight loss in obese subjects in the NUGENOB study: comparison of bioelectrical impedance vs. dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Verdich C; Barbe P; Petersen M; Grau K; Ward L; Macdonald I; Sørensen TI; Oppert JM
    Diabetes Metab; 2011 Jun; 37(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 21236715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women.
    Thomson R; Brinkworth GD; Buckley JD; Noakes M; Clifton PM
    Clin Nutr; 2007 Dec; 26(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 17936443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of body composition assessment by DXA and BIA according to the body mass index: A retrospective study on 3655 measures.
    Achamrah N; Colange G; Delay J; Rimbert A; Folope V; Petit A; Grigioni S; Déchelotte P; Coëffier M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200465. PubMed ID: 30001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of three methods to assess body composition.
    Tewari N; Awad S; Macdonald IA; Lobo DN
    Nutrition; 2018 Mar; 47():1-5. PubMed ID: 29429527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of body composition in pediatric intestinal failure: A comparison study.
    Yanchis D; So S; Patterson C; Belza C; Garofalo E; Wong-Sterling S; Silva C; Avitzur Y; Wales PW; Hulst JM; Kong D; Xuyx L; Courtney-Martin G
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2023 Sep; 47(7):920-929. PubMed ID: 37355855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Agreement of bioelectric impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for body composition evaluation in adults with cystic fibrosis.
    Ziai S; Coriati A; Chabot K; Mailhot M; Richter MV; Rabasa-Lhoret R
    J Cyst Fibros; 2014 Sep; 13(5):585-8. PubMed ID: 24522087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Body Composition Measurement in Bronchiectasis: Comparison between Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, Skinfold Thickness Measurement, and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry before and after Pulmonary Rehabilitation.
    Doña E; Olveira C; Palenque FJ; Porras N; Dorado A; Martín-Valero R; Godoy AM; Espíldora F; Contreras V; Olveira G
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 Aug; 118(8):1464-1473. PubMed ID: 29656933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of a Bioelectrical Impedance Device against the Reference Method Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Anthropometry for the Evaluation of Body Composition in Adults.
    Day K; Kwok A; Evans A; Mata F; Verdejo-Garcia A; Hart K; Ward LC; Truby H
    Nutrients; 2018 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 30308974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of Bioelectric Impedance in Relation to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Measuring Baseline and Change in Body Composition After an Exercise Program in Stroke.
    Vanzella LM; Lawand R; Shuaib M; Oh P; Corbett D; Marzolini S
    J Strength Cond Res; 2022 Dec; 36(12):3273-3279. PubMed ID: 36417356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Appendicular Body Composition Analysis: Validity of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Compared With Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Division I College Athletes.
    Brewer GJ; Blue MNM; Hirsch KR; Peterjohn AM; Smith-Ryan AE
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Nov; 33(11):2920-2925. PubMed ID: 31469766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Body Composition Assessment in Male and Female Bodybuilders: A 4-Compartment Model Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Impedance-Based Devices.
    Graybeal AJ; Moore ML; Cruz MR; Tinsley GM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jun; 34(6):1676-1689. PubMed ID: 30161092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bioelectrical impedance analysis as an alternative to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the assessment of fat mass and appendicular lean mass in patients with obesity.
    Ballesteros-Pomar MD; González-Arnáiz E; Pintor-de-la Maza B; Barajas-Galindo D; Ariadel-Cobo D; González-Roza L; Cano-Rodríguez I
    Nutrition; 2022 Jan; 93():111442. PubMed ID: 34482097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.