These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36855133)

  • 1. Evaluation of in silico pathogenicity prediction tools for the classification of small in-frame indels.
    Cannon S; Williams M; Gunning AC; Wright CF
    BMC Med Genomics; 2023 Feb; 16(1):36. PubMed ID: 36855133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the Performance of In silico Tools for PRRT2 Missense Variants.
    Sun H; Song W; Li B
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38910474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SIFT Indel: predictions for the functional effects of amino acid insertions/deletions in proteins.
    Hu J; Ng PC
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77940. PubMed ID: 24194902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of 13 in silico pathogenicity methods on cancer-related variants.
    Yazar M; Ozbek P
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Jun; 145():105434. PubMed ID: 35364305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. REVEL: An Ensemble Method for Predicting the Pathogenicity of Rare Missense Variants.
    Ioannidis NM; Rothstein JH; Pejaver V; Middha S; McDonnell SK; Baheti S; Musolf A; Li Q; Holzinger E; Karyadi D; Cannon-Albright LA; Teerlink CC; Stanford JL; Isaacs WB; Xu J; Cooney KA; Lange EM; Schleutker J; Carpten JD; Powell IJ; Cussenot O; Cancel-Tassin G; Giles GG; MacInnis RJ; Maier C; Hsieh CL; Wiklund F; Catalona WJ; Foulkes WD; Mandal D; Eeles RA; Kote-Jarai Z; Bustamante CD; Schaid DJ; Hastie T; Ostrander EA; Bailey-Wilson JE; Radivojac P; Thibodeau SN; Whittemore AS; Sieh W
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Oct; 99(4):877-885. PubMed ID: 27666373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisting the analysis of insertions and deletions using regional allele frequencies.
    Krishna Murthy SB; Yang S; Bheda S; Tomar N; Li H; Yaghoobi A; Khan A; Kiryluk K; Motelow JE; Ren N; Gharavi AG; Milo Rasouly H
    Funct Integr Genomics; 2024 May; 24(3):104. PubMed ID: 38764005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AI-derived comparative assessment of the performance of pathogenicity prediction tools on missense variants of breast cancer genes.
    Ahmad RM; Ali BR; Al-Jasmi F; Al Dhaheri N; Al Turki S; Kizhakkedath P; Mohamad MS
    Hum Genomics; 2024 Sep; 18(1):99. PubMed ID: 39256852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the Pathogenicity of Insertion and Deletion Variants with the Variant Effect Scoring Tool (VEST-Indel).
    Douville C; Masica DL; Stenson PD; Cooper DN; Gygax DM; Kim R; Ryan M; Karchin R
    Hum Mutat; 2016 Jan; 37(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 26442818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In Silico Predictions of KCNQ Variant Pathogenicity in Epilepsy.
    Ritter DM; Horn PS; Holland KD
    Pediatr Neurol; 2021 May; 118():48-54. PubMed ID: 33784504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SHINE: protein language model-based pathogenicity prediction for short inframe insertion and deletion variants.
    Fan X; Pan H; Tian A; Chung WK; Shen Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36575831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Refinement of the clinical variant interpretation framework by statistical evidence and machine learning.
    Takata A; Hamanaka K; Matsumoto N
    Med; 2021 May; 2(5):611-632.e9. PubMed ID: 35590234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Predictive
    Pshennikova VG; Barashkov NA; Romanov GP; Teryutin FM; Solov'ev AV; Gotovtsev NN; Nikanorova AA; Nakhodkin SS; Sazonov NN; Morozov IV; Bondar AA; Dzhemileva LU; Khusnutdinova EK; Posukh OL; Fedorova SA
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2019; 2019():5198931. PubMed ID: 31015822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting the pathogenicity of missense variants using features derived from AlphaFold2.
    Schmidt A; Röner S; Mai K; Klinkhammer H; Kircher M; Ludwig KU
    Bioinformatics; 2023 May; 39(5):. PubMed ID: 37084271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. INDELpred: Improving the prediction and interpretation of indel pathogenicity within the clinical genome.
    Wei Y; Zhang T; Wang B; Jiang X; Ling F; Fang M; Jin X; Bai Y
    HGG Adv; 2024 Oct; 5(4):100325. PubMed ID: 38993112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CAPICE: a computational method for Consequence-Agnostic Pathogenicity Interpretation of Clinical Exome variations.
    Li S; van der Velde KJ; de Ridder D; van Dijk ADJ; Soudis D; Zwerwer LR; Deelen P; Hendriksen D; Charbon B; van Gijn ME; Abbott K; Sikkema-Raddatz B; van Diemen CC; Kerstjens-Frederikse WS; Sinke RJ; Swertz MA
    Genome Med; 2020 Aug; 12(1):75. PubMed ID: 32831124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of mutation pathogenicity prediction tools on missense variants associated with 46,XY differences of sex development.
    Montenegro LR; Lerário AM; Nishi MY; Jorge AAL; Mendonca BB
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021; 76():e2052. PubMed ID: 33503178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Curated multiple sequence alignment for the Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) gene and accuracy of in silico pathogenicity predictions.
    Karabachev AD; Martini DJ; Hermel DJ; Solcz D; Richardson ME; Pesaran T; Sarkar IN; Greenblatt MS
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0233673. PubMed ID: 32750050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An integrative approach to predicting the functional effects of small indels in non-coding regions of the human genome.
    Ferlaino M; Rogers MF; Shihab HA; Mort M; Cooper DN; Gaunt TR; Campbell C
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 18(1):442. PubMed ID: 28985712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating variants classified as pathogenic in ClinVar in the DDD Study.
    Wright CF; Eberhardt RY; Constantinou P; Hurles ME; FitzPatrick DR; Firth HV;
    Genet Med; 2021 Mar; 23(3):571-575. PubMed ID: 33149276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Type IV Collagen Variants in CKD: Performance of Computational Predictions for Identifying Pathogenic Variants.
    Shulman C; Liang E; Kamura M; Udwan K; Yao T; Cattran D; Reich H; Hladunewich M; Pei Y; Savige J; Paterson AD; Suico MA; Kai H; Barua M
    Kidney Med; 2021; 3(2):257-266. PubMed ID: 33851121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.