168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36855133)
1. Evaluation of in silico pathogenicity prediction tools for the classification of small in-frame indels.
Cannon S; Williams M; Gunning AC; Wright CF
BMC Med Genomics; 2023 Feb; 16(1):36. PubMed ID: 36855133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the Performance of In silico Tools for PRRT2 Missense Variants.
Sun H; Song W; Li B
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38910474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SIFT Indel: predictions for the functional effects of amino acid insertions/deletions in proteins.
Hu J; Ng PC
PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77940. PubMed ID: 24194902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of 13 in silico pathogenicity methods on cancer-related variants.
Yazar M; Ozbek P
Comput Biol Med; 2022 Jun; 145():105434. PubMed ID: 35364305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. REVEL: An Ensemble Method for Predicting the Pathogenicity of Rare Missense Variants.
Ioannidis NM; Rothstein JH; Pejaver V; Middha S; McDonnell SK; Baheti S; Musolf A; Li Q; Holzinger E; Karyadi D; Cannon-Albright LA; Teerlink CC; Stanford JL; Isaacs WB; Xu J; Cooney KA; Lange EM; Schleutker J; Carpten JD; Powell IJ; Cussenot O; Cancel-Tassin G; Giles GG; MacInnis RJ; Maier C; Hsieh CL; Wiklund F; Catalona WJ; Foulkes WD; Mandal D; Eeles RA; Kote-Jarai Z; Bustamante CD; Schaid DJ; Hastie T; Ostrander EA; Bailey-Wilson JE; Radivojac P; Thibodeau SN; Whittemore AS; Sieh W
Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Oct; 99(4):877-885. PubMed ID: 27666373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assisting the analysis of insertions and deletions using regional allele frequencies.
Krishna Murthy SB; Yang S; Bheda S; Tomar N; Li H; Yaghoobi A; Khan A; Kiryluk K; Motelow JE; Ren N; Gharavi AG; Milo Rasouly H
Funct Integr Genomics; 2024 May; 24(3):104. PubMed ID: 38764005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the Pathogenicity of Insertion and Deletion Variants with the Variant Effect Scoring Tool (VEST-Indel).
Douville C; Masica DL; Stenson PD; Cooper DN; Gygax DM; Kim R; Ryan M; Karchin R
Hum Mutat; 2016 Jan; 37(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 26442818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In Silico Predictions of KCNQ Variant Pathogenicity in Epilepsy.
Ritter DM; Horn PS; Holland KD
Pediatr Neurol; 2021 May; 118():48-54. PubMed ID: 33784504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SHINE: protein language model-based pathogenicity prediction for short inframe insertion and deletion variants.
Fan X; Pan H; Tian A; Chung WK; Shen Y
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36575831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Refinement of the clinical variant interpretation framework by statistical evidence and machine learning.
Takata A; Hamanaka K; Matsumoto N
Med; 2021 May; 2(5):611-632.e9. PubMed ID: 35590234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Predictive
Pshennikova VG; Barashkov NA; Romanov GP; Teryutin FM; Solov'ev AV; Gotovtsev NN; Nikanorova AA; Nakhodkin SS; Sazonov NN; Morozov IV; Bondar AA; Dzhemileva LU; Khusnutdinova EK; Posukh OL; Fedorova SA
ScientificWorldJournal; 2019; 2019():5198931. PubMed ID: 31015822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting the pathogenicity of missense variants using features derived from AlphaFold2.
Schmidt A; Röner S; Mai K; Klinkhammer H; Kircher M; Ludwig KU
Bioinformatics; 2023 May; 39(5):. PubMed ID: 37084271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CAPICE: a computational method for Consequence-Agnostic Pathogenicity Interpretation of Clinical Exome variations.
Li S; van der Velde KJ; de Ridder D; van Dijk ADJ; Soudis D; Zwerwer LR; Deelen P; Hendriksen D; Charbon B; van Gijn ME; Abbott K; Sikkema-Raddatz B; van Diemen CC; Kerstjens-Frederikse WS; Sinke RJ; Swertz MA
Genome Med; 2020 Aug; 12(1):75. PubMed ID: 32831124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of mutation pathogenicity prediction tools on missense variants associated with 46,XY differences of sex development.
Montenegro LR; Lerário AM; Nishi MY; Jorge AAL; Mendonca BB
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021; 76():e2052. PubMed ID: 33503178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Curated multiple sequence alignment for the Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) gene and accuracy of in silico pathogenicity predictions.
Karabachev AD; Martini DJ; Hermel DJ; Solcz D; Richardson ME; Pesaran T; Sarkar IN; Greenblatt MS
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0233673. PubMed ID: 32750050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An integrative approach to predicting the functional effects of small indels in non-coding regions of the human genome.
Ferlaino M; Rogers MF; Shihab HA; Mort M; Cooper DN; Gaunt TR; Campbell C
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 18(1):442. PubMed ID: 28985712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating variants classified as pathogenic in ClinVar in the DDD Study.
Wright CF; Eberhardt RY; Constantinou P; Hurles ME; FitzPatrick DR; Firth HV;
Genet Med; 2021 Mar; 23(3):571-575. PubMed ID: 33149276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Type IV Collagen Variants in CKD: Performance of Computational Predictions for Identifying Pathogenic Variants.
Shulman C; Liang E; Kamura M; Udwan K; Yao T; Cattran D; Reich H; Hladunewich M; Pei Y; Savige J; Paterson AD; Suico MA; Kai H; Barua M
Kidney Med; 2021; 3(2):257-266. PubMed ID: 33851121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In-silico Analysis of
Accetturo M; Bartolomeo N; Stella A
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Jan; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 31979111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of small in-frame insertions/deletions in inherited eye disorders and how structural modelling can help estimate their pathogenicity.
Sergouniotis PI; Barton SJ; Waller S; Perveen R; Ellingford JM; Campbell C; Hall G; Gillespie RL; Bhaskar SS; Ramsden SC; Black GC; Lovell SC
Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2016 Sep; 11(1):125. PubMed ID: 27628848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
