142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36855958)
1. OptImal Gamma kNife lIghTnIng sOlutioN (IGNITION) score to characterize the solution space of the Gamma Knife FIP optimizer for stereotactic radiosurgery.
Tolakanahalli R; Wieczorek DJJ; Lee YC; Tom MC; Hall MD; McDermott MW; Mehta MP; Kotecha R; Gutierrez AN
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 24(6):e13936. PubMed ID: 36855958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic evaluation and plan quality assessment of the Leksell® gamma knife® lightning dose optimizer.
Wieczorek DJ; Kotecha R; Hall MD; Tom MC; Davis S; Ahluwalia MS; McDermott MW; Mehta MP; Gutierrez AN; Tolakanahalli R
Med Dosim; 2022 Spring; 47(1):70-78. PubMed ID: 34696931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A study on inter-planner plan quality variability using a manual planning- or Lightning dose optimizer-approach for single brain lesions treated with the Gamma Knife
Lee YC; Wieczorek DJ; Chaswal V; Kotecha R; Hall MD; Tom MC; Mehta MP; McDermott MW; Gutierrez AN; Tolakanahalli R
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 24(11):e14088. PubMed ID: 37415385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical validation of novel lightning dose optimizer for gamma knife radiosurgery of irregular-shaped arteriovenous malformations and pituitary adenomas.
Pokhrel D; Bernard ME; Knight J; St Clair W; Fraser JF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 23(8):e13669. PubMed ID: 35748118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Homogenous dose prescription in Gamma Knife Radiotherapy: Combining the best of both worlds.
Spaniol M; Abo-Madyan Y; Ruder AM; Fleckenstein J; Giordano FA; Stieler F
Phys Med; 2024 Jan; 117():103202. PubMed ID: 38159546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Evaluation of the Inverse Planning System Utilized in Gamma Knife Lightning.
Cui T; Nie K; Zhu J; Danish S; Weiner J; Chundury A; Ohri N; Zhang Y; Vergalasova I; Yue N; Wang X
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():832656. PubMed ID: 35280733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of radiation dose spillage from the Gamma Knife Perfexion with that from volumetric modulated arc radiosurgery during treatment of multiple brain metastases in a single fraction.
McDonald D; Schuler J; Takacs I; Peng J; Jenrette J; Vanek K
J Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 121 Suppl():51-9. PubMed ID: 25434937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A real-time optimal inverse planning for Gamma Knife radiosurgery by convex optimization: description of the system and first dosimetry data.
Levivier M; Carrillo RE; Charrier R; Martin A; Thiran JP
J Neurosurg; 2018 Dec; 129(Suppl1):111-117. PubMed ID: 30544294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inverse planning in Gamma Knife radiosurgery: A comparative planning study.
Spaniol M; Mai S; Zakrzewski T; Ehmann M; Stieler F
Phys Med; 2021 Feb; 82():269-278. PubMed ID: 33706117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is Real-Time Inverse Planning Optimizing Dose to the Normal Brain? A Prospective Comparative Trial in a Series of Brain Metastases Treated by Stereotactic Radiosurgery.
Beltaifa Y; Hamdi H; Spatola G; Balossier A; Merly L; Castillo L; Cretol A; Regis J
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2022; 100(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 34818656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of a real-time inverse planning for Gamma Knife radiosurgery by convex optimization: a prospective comparative trial in a series of vestibular schwannoma patients.
Régis J; Hamdi H; Loundou A; Merly L; Castillo L; Balossier A; Spatola G
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2021 Apr; 163(4):981-989. PubMed ID: 33398540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantifying and improving the efficiency of Gamma Knife treatment plans for brain metastases: results of a 1-year audit.
Wright G; Hatfield P; Loughrey C; Reiner B; Bownes P
J Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 121 Suppl():44-50. PubMed ID: 25434936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct dosimetric comparison of linear accelerator vs. Gamma Knife fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) of large brain tumors.
Calugaru E; Whiting Z; Delacruz B; Ma D; Garcia B; Goenka A; Chang J
Med Dosim; 2023 Spring; 48(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 36503990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pituitary adenoma treatment plan quality comparison between linear accelerator volumetric modulated arc therapy and Leksell Gamma Knife® radiosurgery.
Veselsky T; Syruckova T; Kindlova A; Osmancikova P
Med Dosim; 2021 Winter; 46(4):440-448. PubMed ID: 34312022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preliminary dosimetric comparison between fixed and rotating source stereotactic radiosurgery systems.
Draeger E; Chen ZJ; Hansen JE; Chiang V; Tien CJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 May; 24(5):e13907. PubMed ID: 36660774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: Evaluation of planning using the sphericity degree of the target volume.
Chagas Saraiva CW; Cardoso SC; Groppo DP; De Salles AAF; de Ávila LF; Ribeiro da Rosa LA
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0225638. PubMed ID: 31923229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric study between a single isocenter dynamic conformal arc therapy technique and Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases treatment: impact of target volume geometrical characteristics.
Chea M; Fezzani K; Jacob J; Cuttat M; Croisé M; Simon JM; Feuvret L; Valery CA; Maingon P; Benadjaoud MA; Jenny C
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Feb; 16(1):45. PubMed ID: 33639959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of inverse treatment planning for gamma knife radiosurgery using fMRI brain activation maps as organs at risk.
Abramian D; Blystad I; Eklund A
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5297-5311. PubMed ID: 37531209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Plan quality assessment of modern radiosurgery technologies in the treatment of multiple brain metastases.
Hiscoke K; Leong A; Hogan AM; Cowley I
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 38262047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Heuristic knowledge-based planning for single-isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery to multiple brain metastases.
Ziemer BP; Sanghvi P; Hattangadi-Gluth J; Moore KL
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5001-5009. PubMed ID: 28731267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
