143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36856129)
1. Prediction of dose deposition matrix using voxel features driven machine learning approach.
Jiao S; Zhao X; Yao S
Br J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 96(1145):20220373. PubMed ID: 36856129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new Monte Carlo-based treatment plan optimization approach for intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Li Y; Tian Z; Shi F; Song T; Wu Z; Liu Y; Jiang S; Jia X
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(7):2903-19. PubMed ID: 25776792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of the normalized prescription isodose line on the magnitude of Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam target dose differences for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Zheng D; Zhang Q; Liang X; Zhu X; Verma V; Wang S; Zhou S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):48-58. PubMed ID: 27455476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue heterogeneities corrections in the treatment of head and neck cancer patients using stereotactic radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; McClinton C; Sood S; Badkul R; Saleh H; Jiang H; Lominska C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):258-270. PubMed ID: 27074489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms in conformal lung radiotherapy.
Elcim Y; Dirican B; Yavas O
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):616-624. PubMed ID: 30079474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of dose-volume histogram prediction for organ-at risk and planning target volume based on machine learning.
Jiao SX; Wang ML; Chen LX; Liu XW
Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):3117. PubMed ID: 33542427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is an analytical dose engine sufficient for intensity modulated proton therapy in lung cancer?
Teoh S; Fiorini F; George B; Vallis KA; Van den Heuvel F
Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190583. PubMed ID: 31696729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comprehensive dosimetric study of Monte Carlo and pencil-beam algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy for breast cancer.
Liang X; Li Z; Zheng D; Bradley JA; Rutenberg M; Mendenhall N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 30488548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficiency enhancements of a Monte Carlo beamlet based treatment planning process: implementation and parameter study.
Mueller S; Guyer G; Volken W; Frei D; Torelli N; Aebersold DM; Manser P; Fix MK
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Feb; 68(4):. PubMed ID: 36655485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of X-ray voxel Monte Carlo versus pencil beam-based dose calculation in stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung cancer under normal and deep inspiration breath hold.
Landoni V; Borzì GR; Strolin S; Bruzzaniti V; Soriani A; D'Alessio D; Ambesi F; Di Grazia AM; Strigari L
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Jun; 14(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 25223324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance Comparison of Knowledge-Based Dose Prediction Techniques Based on Limited Patient Data.
Landers A; Neph R; Scalzo F; Ruan D; Sheng K
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818811150. PubMed ID: 30411666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inverse-optimized 3D conformal planning: minimizing complexity while achieving equivalence with beamlet IMRT in multiple clinical sites.
Fraass BA; Steers JM; Matuszak MM; McShan DL
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3361-74. PubMed ID: 22755717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct aperture optimization for IMRT using Monte Carlo generated beamlets.
Bergman AM; Bush K; Milette MP; Popescu IA; Otto K; Duzenli C
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3666-79. PubMed ID: 17089832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Forward treatment planning for modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) employing Monte Carlo methods.
Henzen D; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Neuenschwander H; Born EJ; Lössl K; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MF; Fix MK
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031712. PubMed ID: 24593716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-engine transformation-based fast dose calculation for MRI-Linac online treatment planning.
Song T; Zhou L; Li Y
Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2429-2437. PubMed ID: 36346038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
