150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36857586)
1. Exploring the learning curve in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review.
Chan KS; Oo AM
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Sep; 36(9):. PubMed ID: 36857586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mederos MA; de Virgilio MJ; Shenoy R; Ye L; Toste PA; Mak SS; Booth MS; Begashaw MM; Wilson M; Gunnar W; Shekelle PG; Maggard-Gibbons M; Girgis MD
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2129228. PubMed ID: 34724556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer.
Deng HY; Huang WX; Li G; Li SX; Luo J; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
Dis Esophagus; 2018 Aug; 31(8):. PubMed ID: 29538633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy - our first experience.
Haruštiak T; Jaroščiaková S; Šnajdauf M; Pazdro A; Lischke R
Rozhl Chir; 2023; 102(11):422-429. PubMed ID: 38290818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
Zhang Y; Dong D; Cao Y; Huang M; Li J; Zhang J; Lin J; Sarkaria IS; Toni L; David R; He J; Li H
Ann Surg; 2023 Jul; 278(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 36538615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy have superiority over thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive oesophagectomy in lymph node dissection?
Li XK; Xu Y; Zhou H; Cong ZZ; Wu WJ; Qiang Y; Shen Y
Dis Esophagus; 2021 Feb; 34(2):. PubMed ID: 32582945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Change from Hybrid to Fully Minimally Invasive and Robotic Esophagectomy is Possible without Compromises.
Grimminger PP; Tagkalos E; Hadzijusufovic E; Corvinus F; Babic B; Lang H
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Oct; 67(7):589-596. PubMed ID: 30216947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus the conventional minimally invasive one: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Jin D; Yao L; Yu J; Liu R; Guo T; Yang K; Gou Y
Int J Med Robot; 2019 Jun; 15(3):e1988. PubMed ID: 30737881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
Sakurai T; Hoshino A; Miyoshi K; Yamada E; Enomoto M; Mazaki J; Kuwabara H; Iwasaki K; Ota Y; Tachibana S; Hayashi Y; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 38504312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
Surgery; 2021 Dec; 170(6):1692-1701. PubMed ID: 34389164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Learning curve for adoption of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review of oncological, clinical, and efficiency outcomes.
Pickering OJ; van Boxel GI; Carter NC; Mercer SJ; Knight BC; Pucher PH
Dis Esophagus; 2023 May; 36(6):. PubMed ID: 36572404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic Esophagectomy Trends and Early Surgical Outcomes: The US Experience.
Khaitan PG; Vekstein AM; Thibault D; Kosinski A; Hartwig MG; Block M; Gaissert H; Wolf AS
Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 Mar; 115(3):710-717. PubMed ID: 36470561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of training pathway to reach expert performance levels based on proficiency-based progression in robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).
Müller DT; Brunner S; Straatman J; Babic B; Eckhoff JA; Reisewitz A; Storms C; Schiffmann LM; Schmidt T; Schröder W; Bruns CJ; Fuchs HF
Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):7305-7316. PubMed ID: 37580580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) with side-to-side semi-mechanical anastomosis: analysis of a learning curve.
Rebecchi F; Bonomo LD; Salzano A; Camandona M; Morino M
Updates Surg; 2022 Jun; 74(3):907-916. PubMed ID: 35403978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen H; Liu Y; Peng H; Wang R; Wang K; Li D
Transl Cancer Res; 2021 Nov; 10(11):4601-4616. PubMed ID: 35116317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Short-Term Outcome of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.
Fujita T; Sato K; Ozaki A; Akutsu T; Fujiwara H; Kojima T; Daiko H
World J Surg; 2022 Aug; 46(8):1926-1933. PubMed ID: 35499646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
