145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36859374)
1. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic investigation of a fractured non-submerged dental implant associated with abutment fracture.
Nguyen TTH; Eo MY; Mustakim KR; Seo MH; Myoung H; Kim SM
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 49(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 36859374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture and Fatigue of Dental Implants Fixtures and Abutments with a Novel Internal Connection Design: An In Vitro Pilot Study Comparing Three Different Dental Implant Systems.
On SW; Yi SM; Park IY; Byun SH; Yang BE
J Funct Biomater; 2022 Nov; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 36412880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is fatigue mechanism implicated in intraoral fracture of narrow dental implants? A thorough retrieval analysis of two failed implant fixtures retrieved from a single patient.
Al Jabbari YS; Fournelle R; Sufyan A; Zinelis S
Saudi Dent J; 2024 May; 36(5):770-777. PubMed ID: 38766294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dental implant-abutment fracture resistance and wear induced by single-unit screw-retained CAD components fabricated by four CAM methods after mechanical cycling.
Markarian RA; Galles DP; França FMG
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 33640089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro fatigue tests and in silico finite element analysis of dental implants with different fixture/abutment joint types using computer-aided design models.
Yamaguchi S; Yamanishi Y; Machado LS; Matsumoto S; Tovar N; Coelho PG; Thompson VP; Imazato S
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jan; 62(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 28427837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical integrity of cement- and screw-retained zirconium-lithium silicate glass-ceramic crowns to Morse taper implants.
Vahey BR; Sordi MB; Stanley K; Magini RS; Novaes de Oliveira AP; Fredel MC; Henriques B; Souza JCM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):721-731. PubMed ID: 30093122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of implant abutment connection designs, and implant diameters on screw loosening before and after cyclic loading: In-vitro study.
Sammour SR; Maamoun El-Sheikh M; Aly El-Gendy A
Dent Mater; 2019 Nov; 35(11):e265-e271. PubMed ID: 31427043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and Failure Modes of a Hybrid Ceramic Abutment Prototype.
Silva NR; Teixeira HS; Silveira LM; Bonfante EA; Coelho PG; Thompson VP
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jan; 27(1):83-87. PubMed ID: 26916603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.
Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Happe A; Beuer F
Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1215-20. PubMed ID: 23021964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Delayed Implant Fixture Displacement into the Maxillary Sinus Five Years Post-Loading: Unraveling the Causes - A Case Report.
Cho YJ; Jeong YT; Lee TH; Cho HW
J Oral Implantol; 2024 Apr; 50(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 38353278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Collagen fiber orientation near a fractured dental implant after a 5-year loading period: case report.
Traini T; De Paoli S; Caputi S; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 16569964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stability and aging resistance of a zirconia oral implant using a carbon fiber-reinforced screw for implant-abutment connection.
Spies BC; Fross A; Adolfsson E; Bagegni A; Doerken S; Kohal RJ
Dent Mater; 2018 Oct; 34(10):1585-1595. PubMed ID: 30180975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of implant component fractures in external and internal type: A 12-year retrospective study.
Yi Y; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lee SJ; Heo SJ
J Adv Prosthodont; 2018 Apr; 10(2):155-162. PubMed ID: 29713437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite Element Analysis of a New Non-Engaging Abutment System for Three-Unit Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Byun SH; Seo JH; Cho RY; Yi SM; Kim LK; Han HS; On SW; Kim WH; An HW; Yang BE
Bioengineering (Basel); 2022 Sep; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 36290451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of Marginal Bone Loss Progression on Stress Distribution in Different Implant-Abutment Connections and Abutment Materials: A 3D Finite Element Analysis Study.
Lin CP; Shyu YT; Wu YL; Tsai MH; Chen HS; Wu AY
Materials (Basel); 2022 Aug; 15(17):. PubMed ID: 36079245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prosthetic complications with monolithic or micro-veneered implant-supported zirconia single-unit, multiple-unit, and complete-arch prostheses on titanium base abutments: A single center retrospective study with mean follow-up period of 72.35 months.
Saponaro PC; Karasan D; Donmez MB; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 36321480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of Titanium vs Titanium-Zirconium Implant-Abutment Connections.
Leo SJ; Tan MY; Yee SHX; Lee FKF; Tan KBC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):740-747. PubMed ID: 35904830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.
Wang JH; Judge R; Bailey D
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(5):435-44. PubMed ID: 27611744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
