179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36859711)
1. Length of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: Does size matter? - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
John A; Lim A; Catterwell R; Selth L; O'Callaghan M
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Dec; 26(4):673-680. PubMed ID: 36859711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary Gleason grade and Gleason grade group at positive surgical margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
John A; John H; Catterwell R; Selth LA; Callaghan MO
BJU Int; 2021 May; 127 Suppl 1():13-22. PubMed ID: 33973331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does Gleason score of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy affect biochemical recurrence and oncological outcomes? Protocol for systematic review.
John A; O'Callaghan M; Catterwell R; Selth L
BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e034612. PubMed ID: 32209629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort studies.
Zhang L; Wu B; Zha Z; Zhao H; Jiang Y; Yuan J
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 16(1):124. PubMed ID: 29970100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical method influences specimen margins and biochemical recurrence during radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Srougi V; Bessa J; Baghdadi M; Nunes-Silva I; da Costa JB; Garcia-Barreras S; Barret E; Rozet F; Galiano M; Sanchez-Salas R; Cathelineau X
World J Urol; 2017 Oct; 35(10):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 28243789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of the extent and location of positive surgical margins on the risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancers.
Matti B; Reeves F; Prouse M; Zargar-Shoshtari K
Prostate; 2021 Dec; 81(16):1428-1434. PubMed ID: 34570379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Length of site-specific positive surgical margins as a risk factor for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Hsu M; Chang SL; Ferrari M; Nolley R; Presti JC; Brooks JD
Int J Urol; 2011 Apr; 18(4):272-9. PubMed ID: 21342296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic Value of Gleason Score at Positive Surgical Margin in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lysenko I; Mori K; Mostafaei H; Enikeev DV; Karakiewicz PI; Briganti A; Quhal F; Janisch F; Shariat SF
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Oct; 18(5):e517-e522. PubMed ID: 32229268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defining Clinically Meaningful Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer.
Martini A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Mazzone E; Stabile A; Scarcella S; Robesti D; Barletta F; Cucchiara V; Mirone V; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Feb; 4(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 31411971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Heinze A; S Abrams-Pompe R; Budäus L; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
Prostate; 2022 Jun; 82(9):949-956. PubMed ID: 35344221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radical prostatectomy and the effect of close surgical margins: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Herforth C; Stroup SP; Chen Z; Howard LE; Freedland SJ; Moreira DM; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Cooperberg MR; Amling CL; Kane CJ
BJU Int; 2018 Oct; 122(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 29473992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.
Evren I; Hacıislamoğlu A; Ekşi M; Yavuzsan AH; Baytekin F; Çolakoğlu Y; Canoğlu D; Tugcu V
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 30325603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Close surgical margins after radical prostatectomy mimic biochemical recurrence rates of positive margins.
Whalen MJ; Shapiro EY; Rothberg MB; Turk AT; Woldu SL; Roy Choudhury A; Patel T; Badani KK
Urol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):494.e9-494.e14. PubMed ID: 26259665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of positive surgical margin status in predicting early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Morizane S; Yumioka T; Makishima K; Tsounapi P; Iwamoto H; Hikita K; Honda M; Umekita Y; Takenaka A
Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Oct; 26(10):1961-1967. PubMed ID: 34313905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
