These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36859778)

  • 1. Robot-assisted sacrohysteropexy vs robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in women with primary advanced apical prolapse: A retrospective cohort study.
    Chan IS; Chen GY; Shih YC; Jiang LY; Chang YH; Wang TY; Chen YJ
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2023 Apr; 86(4):418-425. PubMed ID: 36859778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robot-assisted surgery for the management of apical prolapse: a bi-centre prospective cohort study.
    van Zanten F; Schraffordt Koops SE; O'Sullivan OE; Lenters E; Broeders I; O'Reilly BA
    BJOG; 2019 Jul; 126(8):1065-1073. PubMed ID: 30924606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy: not only for vaginal vault suspension? An observational cohort study.
    van Zanten F; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):377-384. PubMed ID: 34159402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy with hinotori, a brand-new surgical robot system produced in Japan; report of initial clinical case series.
    Ichino M; Sasaki H; Takenaka M; Zennami K; Takahara K; Shiroki R
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2024 Oct; 17(4):e13380. PubMed ID: 39187427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual function after robot-assisted prolapse surgery: a prospective study.
    van Zanten F; Brem C; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):905-912. PubMed ID: 29687171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Securing Mesh with Delayed Absorbable Suture Does Not Increase Risk of Prolapse Recurrence After Robotic Sacral Colpopexy.
    Powell CR; Tachibana I; Eckrich B; Rothenberg J; Hathaway J
    J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):944-949. PubMed ID: 32037875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension: 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    Izett-Kay ML; Rahmanou P; Cartwright RJ; Price N; Jackson SR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1957-1965. PubMed ID: 34424347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraoperative Complications and Perioperative and Surgical Outcomes of Single-Port Robotics-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy.
    Oh S; Yi J; Song AY; Jee J; Bae N; Shin JH
    Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Jul; 35(7):1521-1526. PubMed ID: 38900162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: efficiency of robotic assistance compared to standard laparoscopy.
    Evangelopoulos N; Nessi A; Achtari C
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):72. PubMed ID: 38340232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chang CL; Chen CH; Chang SJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 33760992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: early postoperative outcomes after surgical reduction of enlarged genital hiatus.
    Bradley MS; Askew AL; Vaughan MH; Kawasaki A; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):514.e1-514.e8. PubMed ID: 29425837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: Insights for a challenging surgical setting.
    Dabreteau T; Delangle R; Azaïs H; Phé V; Moawad G; Uzan C; Canlorbe G
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Jun; 51(6):102380. PubMed ID: 35421592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes in 450 Women After Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Mueller MG; Jacobs KM; Mueller ER; Abernethy MG; Kenton KS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 27054799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot-assisted Vs Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for High-stage Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-center Study.
    Illiano E; Ditonno P; Giannitsas K; De Rienzo G; Bini V; Costantini E
    Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():116-123. PubMed ID: 31563536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (SIMS): surgical and functional outcomes at 1 year.
    Lo TS; Tan YL; Cortes EF; Pue LB; Wu PY; Al-Kharabsheh A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 25017520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.