107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36860163)
1. An evaluation of intravenous medication preparation times before and after implementation of first-party digital image capture functionality.
Hsia BM; Shelton AT; Mara KC; Lim D; Mistri A; Ong K; Draper EW
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2023 May; 80(11):663-669. PubMed ID: 36860163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of gravimetric-based technology-assisted workflow for nonhazardous sterile product preparation.
Bucci TG; Hedrick TL; Roberts PA; Lin K; South MD; Willoughby IR; Eckel SF; Hess ET; Eberwein S; Amerine LB
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jul; 76(14):1071-1077. PubMed ID: 31361879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sterile product compounding using an i.v. compounding workflow management system at a pediatric hospital.
Moniz TT; Chu S; Tom C; Lutz P; Arnold A; Gura KM; Patterson A
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2014 Aug; 71(15):1311-7. PubMed ID: 25027539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a gravimetric-based technology-assisted workflow system on hazardous sterile product preparation.
Roberts PA; Willoughby IR; Barnes N; Eckel SF; Paruscio A; Valgus JM; Amerine LB
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2018 Sep; 75(17):1286-1292. PubMed ID: 30139736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of IV oncology infusions compounded via robotics and gravimetrics-assisted workflow processes.
Pang B; Earl M; Knoer S; Yaniv A; Willner M; Boyd A
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2021 Jan; 78(2):122-134. PubMed ID: 33064792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of telepharmacy and the use of a gravimetric technology-assisted workflow system for remote sterile product pharmacist checks.
Jean SJ; Francart SJ; Eckel SF; Schenkat D; Eberwein S; Lamm M; Barnes N; Valgus JM; Amerine LB
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2020 Mar; 77(7):560-567. PubMed ID: 32086506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of using an intravenous workflow management system (IVWMS) on cost and patient safety.
Lin AC; Deng Y; Thaibah H; Hingl J; Penm J; Ivey MF; Thomas M
Int J Med Inform; 2018 Jul; 115():73-79. PubMed ID: 29779722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deviations From Best Practice: Findings From a Certified Patient Safety Organization Remote-Verification Observational Study of Intravenous Compounding of Chemotherapeutic and Ancillary Drugs.
Lombardo J; Coles J; Ryszka D; Roussel C; Smith W
J Pharm Pract; 2023 Dec; 36(6):1438-1447. PubMed ID: 36271614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Parenteral product error detection before and after implementation of intravenous workflow management technology.
Wright KR; Dekarske B; Clark JS; Chaffee BW
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2019 Jan; 25(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 28776479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of real-time data obtained from gravimetric preparation of antineoplastic agents shows medication errors with possible critical therapeutic impact: Results of a large-scale, multicentre, multinational, retrospective study.
Terkola R; Czejka M; Bérubé J
J Clin Pharm Ther; 2017 Aug; 42(4):446-453. PubMed ID: 28429389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of an i.v.-compounding robot in a hospital-based cancer center pharmacy.
Yaniv AW; Knoer SJ
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2013 Nov; 70(22):2030-7. PubMed ID: 24173011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated compounding technology and workflow solutions for the preparation of chemotherapy: a systematic review.
Batson S; Mitchell SA; Lau D; Canobbio M; de Goede A; Singh I; Loesch U
Eur J Hosp Pharm; 2020 Nov; 27(6):330-336. PubMed ID: 33097615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of robotic antineoplastic preparation on safety, workflow, and costs.
Seger AC; Churchill WW; Keohane CA; Belisle CD; Wong ST; Sylvester KW; Chesnick MA; Burdick E; Wien MF; Cotugno MC; Bates DW; Rothschild JM
J Oncol Pract; 2012 Nov; 8(6):344-9, 1 p following 349. PubMed ID: 23598843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk factors for i.v. compounding errors when using an automated workflow management system.
Deng Y; Lin AC; Hingl J; Huang G; Altaye M; Maynard H; Mayhaus D; Penm J
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2016 Jun; 73(12):887-93. PubMed ID: 27261239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicenter study to evaluate the benefits of technology-assisted workflow on i.v. room efficiency, costs, and safety.
Eckel SF; Higgins JP; Hess E; Cerbone T; Civiello JB; Conley C; Jafari N; Shah S; Speth SL; Thornton L
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Jun; 76(12):895-901. PubMed ID: 31361850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of electronic health record implementation on pharmacist interventions related to oral chemotherapy management.
Finn A; Bondarenka C; Edwards K; Hartwell R; Letton C; Perez A
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2017 Dec; 23(8):563-574. PubMed ID: 27573921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating An Automated Compounding Workflow Software for Safety and Efficiency: Implementation Study.
Meren ÜH; Waterson J
JMIR Hum Factors; 2021 Nov; 8(4):e29180. PubMed ID: 34456182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective daily review of discharge medications by pharmacists: Effects on measures of safety and efficiency.
Craynon R; Hager DR; Reed M; Pawola J; Rough SS
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2018 Oct; 75(19):1486-1492. PubMed ID: 29976829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Errors detected in pediatric oral liquid medication doses prepared in an automated workflow management system.
Bledsoe S; Van Buskirk A; Falconer RJ; Hollon A; Hoebing W; Jokic S
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2018 Feb; 75(3):127-131. PubMed ID: 29371193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risks and medication errors analysis to evaluate the impact of a chemotherapy compounding workflow management system on cancer patients' safety.
Marzal-Alfaro M; Rodriguez-Gonzalez CG; Escudero-Vilaplana V; Revuelta-Herrero JL; González-Haba E; Ibáñez-Garcia S; Iglesias-Peinado I; Herranz-Alonso A; Sanjurjo Saez M
Health Informatics J; 2020 Sep; 26(3):1995-2010. PubMed ID: 31912756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
