171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36860861)
1. Predictive value of
Tang S; Zhang Y; Li Y; Zhang Y; Xu Y; Ding H; Chen Y; Ren P; Ye H; Fu S; Lin S
Front Immunol; 2023; 14():1034416. PubMed ID: 36860861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interim [
Sachpekidis C; Kopp-Schneider A; Pan L; Papamichail D; Haberkorn U; Hassel JC; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jun; 48(6):1932-1943. PubMed ID: 33336264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Construction of A Nomogram Prediction Model for PD-L1 Expression
in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Based on 18F-FDG PET/CT Metabolic Parameters].
Hao L; Wang L; Zhang M; Yan J; Zhang F
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi; 2023 Nov; 26(11):833-842. PubMed ID: 38061885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The utility of
Kitajima K; Kawanaka Y; Komoto H; Minami T; Yokoi T; Kuribayashi K; Kijima T; Nakamura A; Hashimoto M; Kondo N; Hasegawa S; Yamakado K
Hell J Nucl Med; 2021; 24(3):186-198. PubMed ID: 34901959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The predictive value of
Mattoli MV; Massaccesi M; Castelluccia A; Scolozzi V; Mantini G; Calcagni ML
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):4. PubMed ID: 28057034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using positron emission tomography (PET) response criteria in solid tumours (PERCIST) 1.0 for evaluation of 2'-deoxy-2'-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose-PET/CT scans to predict survival early during treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Fledelius J; Khalil AA; Hjorthaug K; Frøkiaer J
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 60(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 26678718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective evaluation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography for response evaluation in recurrent carcinoma cervix: does metabolic response predict survival?
Dhull VS; Sharma P; Sharma DN; Maharjan S; Suman Kc S; Patel C; Bal C; Kumar R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):312-20. PubMed ID: 24407578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What
Turgeon GA; Iravani A; Akhurst T; Beaulieu A; Callahan JW; Bressel M; Cole AJ; Everitt SJ; Siva S; Hicks RJ; Ball DL; Mac Manus MP
J Nucl Med; 2019 Mar; 60(3):328-334. PubMed ID: 30030343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Seol HY; Kim YS; Kim SJ
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Nov; 11(11):3260-3268. PubMed ID: 32951338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The efficiency of
Tao X; Li N; Wu N; He J; Ying J; Gao S; Wang S; Wang J; Wang Z; Ling Y; Tang W; Zhang Z
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1209-1219. PubMed ID: 32043180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Value of
Vekens K; Everaert H; Neyns B; Ilsen B; Decoster L
Clin Lung Cancer; 2021 Sep; 22(5):432-440. PubMed ID: 33879398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metabolic (FDG-PET) response after radical radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer correlates with patterns of failure.
Mac Manus MP; Hicks RJ; Matthews JP; Wirth A; Rischin D; Ball DL
Lung Cancer; 2005 Jul; 49(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 15949595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Response evaluation after immunotherapy in NSCLC: Early response assessment using FDG PET/CT.
Park S; Lee Y; Kim TS; Kim SK; Han JY
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Dec; 99(51):e23815. PubMed ID: 33371161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective assessment using
Yamaguchi O; Kaira K; Naruse I; Umeda Y; Honda T; Watanabe S; Ichikawa K; Tateishi K; Kasahara N; Higuchi T; Hashimoto K; Shinomiya S; Miura Y; Shiono A; Mouri A; Imai H; Iizuka K; Ishizuka T; Minato K; Suda S; Kagamu H; Mori K; Kuji I; Seki N
Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11832. PubMed ID: 35821395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of interim
Sachpekidis C; Anwar H; Winkler J; Kopp-Schneider A; Larribere L; Haberkorn U; Hassel JC; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Jul; 45(8):1289-1296. PubMed ID: 29478079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive value of early 18F-FDG PET/CT studies for treatment response evaluation to ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma: preliminary results of an ongoing study.
Sachpekidis C; Larribere L; Pan L; Haberkorn U; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Hassel JC
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Mar; 42(3):386-96. PubMed ID: 25359635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST for PET/CT response evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan and cetuximab.
Skougaard K; Nielsen D; Jensen BV; Hendel HW
J Nucl Med; 2013 Jul; 54(7):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23572497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of response to stereotactic body radiation therapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.
Han J; Song Q; Guo F; Du R; Fang H; Kang J; Lu Z
Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Jun; 43(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 35354781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The prognostic value of [
Sachpekidis C; Weru V; Kopp-Schneider A; Hassel JC; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jul; 50(9):2699-2714. PubMed ID: 37099131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New insight on the correlation of metabolic status on
Wang Y; Zhao N; Wu Z; Pan N; Shen X; Liu T; Wei F; You J; Xu W; Ren X
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1127-1136. PubMed ID: 31502013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
