These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36861421)

  • 1. On the Disposition to Think Analytically: Four Distinct Intuitive-Analytic Thinking Styles.
    Newton C; Feeney J; Pennycook G
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2024 Jun; 50(6):906-923. PubMed ID: 36861421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?
    Pennycook G; Cheyne JA; Koehler DJ; Fugelsang JA
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):341-8. PubMed ID: 25740762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the cognitive reflection test as a measure of intuition/reflection, numeracy, and insight problem solving, and the implications for understanding real-world judgments and beliefs.
    Patel N; Baker SG; Scherer LD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Dec; 148(12):2129-2153. PubMed ID: 31021149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Culture as a Moderator of Epistemically Suspect Beliefs.
    Majima Y; Walker AC; Turpin MH; Fugelsang JA
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():745580. PubMed ID: 35222175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intuitive and Deliberative Empathizers and Systemizers.
    Svedholm-Häkkinen AM; Lindeman M
    J Pers; 2017 Oct; 85(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27281293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining the relationship between metacognitive trust in thinking styles and supernatural beliefs.
    van Mulukom V; Baimel A; Maraldi E; Farias M
    Scand J Psychol; 2024 Apr; 65(2):206-222. PubMed ID: 37746878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thinking false and slow: Implausible beliefs and the Cognitive Reflection Test.
    Martire KA; Robson SG; Drew M; Nicholls K; Faasse K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Dec; 30(6):2387-2396. PubMed ID: 37369977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Development of Intuitive and Analytic Thinking in Autism: The Case of Cognitive Reflection.
    Morsanyi K; Hamilton J
    J Intell; 2023 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 37367526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The separate roles of the reflective mind and involuntary inhibitory control in gatekeeping paranormal beliefs and the underlying intuitive confusions.
    Svedholm AM; Lindeman M
    Br J Psychol; 2013 Aug; 104(3):303-19. PubMed ID: 23848383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of intuitive and analytic reasoning styles by patients with persecutory delusions.
    Freeman D; Lister R; Evans N
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2014 Dec; 45(4):454-8. PubMed ID: 25000504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of response format on cognitive reflection: Validating a two- and four-option multiple choice question version of the Cognitive Reflection Test.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2511-2522. PubMed ID: 29589333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beliefs About Gambling Mediate the Effect of Cognitive Style on Gambling Problems.
    Armstrong T; Rockloff M; Browne M; Blaszczynski A
    J Gambl Stud; 2020 Sep; 36(3):871-886. PubMed ID: 32215774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    Tomljenovic H; Bubic A; Erceg N
    Psychol Health; 2020 May; 35(5):538-554. PubMed ID: 31588791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive styles and religion.
    Yilmaz O
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2021 Aug; 40():150-154. PubMed ID: 33130329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.
    Kruglanski AW; Gigerenzer G
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 21244188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intuition, reason, and metacognition.
    Thompson VA; Prowse Turner JA; Pennycook G
    Cogn Psychol; 2011 Nov; 63(3):107-40. PubMed ID: 21798215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Not all great minds think alike: systematic and intuitive cognitive styles.
    Sagiv L; Amit A; Ein-Gar D; Arieli S
    J Pers; 2014 Oct; 82(5):402-17. PubMed ID: 24007535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analytic Thinking and Political Orientation in the Corona Crisis.
    Maglić M; Pavlović T; Franc R
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():631800. PubMed ID: 34366959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conspiratorial Beliefs and Cognitive Styles: An Integrated Look on Analytic Thinking, Critical Thinking, and Scientific Reasoning in Relation to (Dis)trust in Conspiracy Theories.
    Gjoneska B
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():736838. PubMed ID: 34712182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking.
    Pennycook G; Rand DG
    J Pers; 2020 Apr; 88(2):185-200. PubMed ID: 30929263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.