116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36861714)
21. [Risk stratified management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ based on cone margin state].
Huang SS; Sui L; Chen LM; Zhang HW; Tao X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 56(9):622-629. PubMed ID: 34547863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Necessity for subsequent surgery in women of child-bearing age with positive margins after conization.
Wang X; Xu J; Gao Y; Qu P
BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):191. PubMed ID: 33962590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Conservative management of stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with positive resection margins after conization.
Kim WY; Chang SJ; Chang KH; Yoo SC; Ryu HS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 May; 109(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 20096835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Factors That Influence Surgical Margin State in Patients Undergoing Cold Knife Conization - A Single Center Experience.
Aluloski I; Tanturovski M; Petrusevska G; Jovanovic R; Kostadinova-Kunovska S
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2017 Dec; 38(3):113-120. PubMed ID: 29668476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease.
Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Botsis D; Kalogirou O; Giannikos L
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997; 18(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9105859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Human papillomavirus test after conization in predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy specimens.
Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 114(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 19546763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Extensive lesions and a positive cone margin are strong predictors of residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for squamous intraepithelial lesion grade 2 or 3 study design.
Peng H; Liu W; Jiang J; Du H
BMC Womens Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):454. PubMed ID: 37641051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Post-cervical conization outcomes in patients with high-grade intraepithelial lesions.
Simões RB; Campaner AB
APMIS; 2013 Dec; 121(12):1153-61. PubMed ID: 23607318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Predictors of residual lesion in cervix after conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and microinvasive cervical cancer].
Tan XJ; Wu M; Lang JH; Ma SQ; Shen K; Yang J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 89(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 19489237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Management of patients with positive margin after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions.
Zhang Y; Su Y; Tang Y; Qin L; Shen Y; Wang B; Zhou Y; Zhang M; Zhang T
Lasers Surg Med; 2022 Oct; 54(8):1099-1106. PubMed ID: 35811501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Risk factors predicting residual lesion in subsequent hysterectomy following cold knife conization (CKC) for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL).
Zeng Y; Jiang T; Zheng Y; Yang J; Wei H; Yi C; Liu Y; Chen K
BMC Womens Health; 2022 Aug; 22(1):358. PubMed ID: 36042513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Value of human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid testing after conization in the prediction of residual disease in the subsequent hysterectomy specimen.
Lin CT; Tseng CJ; Lai CH; Hsueh S; Huang KG; Huang HJ; Chao A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 184(5):940-5. PubMed ID: 11303202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature.
Hefler LA; Polterauer S; Schneitter A; Concin N; Hofstetter G; Bentz E; Leipold H; Tempfer C; Reinthaller A
Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Menopausal status is associated with a high risk for residual disease after cervical conization with positive margins.
Bilibio JP; Monego HI; Binda MLA; Dos Reis R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0217562. PubMed ID: 31163055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins.
Diaz ES; Aoyama C; Baquing MA; Beavis A; Silva E; Holschneider C; Cass I
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24262876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predictors of recurrent/residual disease after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.
Chikazawa K; Netsu S; Motomatsu S; Konno R
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Apr; 42(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 26786387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Relationship between various histological status of margins of LEEP and residual HSIL or worse at hysterectomy following conization].
Xiao YP; Tao X; Zhao CY; Qu YQ; Xie F; Ning Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 30695901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of Human Papillomavirus Subtype on the Rate of Positive Surgical Margin After Cervical Conization.
Purut YE; Giray B; Akis S; Peker EK; Babayeva G; Kabaca C; Api M
Int J Surg Pathol; 2023 Feb; 31(1):20-25. PubMed ID: 36514291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
