These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36862454)

  • 1. Direct evidence for proactive suppression of salient-but-irrelevant emotional information inputs.
    Xu L; Yang Z; Ji H; Chen W; Lin Z; Huang Y; Ding X
    Emotion; 2023 Oct; 23(7):2039-2058. PubMed ID: 36862454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emotional distraction in the context of memory-based orienting of attention.
    Raeder SM; Bone JK; Patai EZ; Holmes EA; Nobre AC; Murphy SE
    Emotion; 2019 Dec; 19(8):1366-1376. PubMed ID: 30676039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ignoring the unknown: Attentional suppression of unpredictable visual distraction.
    Ma X; Abrams RA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 36227324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contextual Modulation of Emotional Distraction: Attentional Capture and Motivational Significance.
    Micucci A; Ferrari V; De Cesarei A; Codispoti M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 32(4):621-633. PubMed ID: 31765599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of abrupt-onset and color singleton distractors: Evidence from event-related potential studies.
    Chen X; Xu B; Chen Y; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14290. PubMed ID: 36946491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional suppression of dynamic versus static salient distractors.
    Adams OJ; Gaspelin N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38839713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proactive suppression can be applied to multiple salient distractors in visual search.
    Drisdelle BL; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Sep; 152(9):2504-2519. PubMed ID: 37126051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reward expectation enhances reactive control of distraction by emotionally negative stimuli.
    Rong Y; Li Y; Müller HJ; Wei P
    Emotion; 2023 Aug; 23(5):1349-1359. PubMed ID: 36095173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Global enhancement of target color-not proactive suppression-explains attentional deployment during visual search.
    Oxner M; Martinovic J; Forschack N; Lempe R; Gundlach C; Müller M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jun; 152(6):1705-1722. PubMed ID: 37023328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces.
    Hodsoll S; Viding E; Lavie N
    Emotion; 2011 Apr; 11(2):346-53. PubMed ID: 21500903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attending to emotional faces in the flanker task: Probably much less automatic than previously assumed.
    Tannert S; Rothermund K
    Emotion; 2020 Mar; 20(2):217-235. PubMed ID: 30550305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of fearful faces on the attentional blink is modulated by emotional task relevance: An event-related potential study.
    Sun M; Liu F; Cui L; Wei P; Zhang Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Nov; 162():108043. PubMed ID: 34600892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expectation modulates the preferential processing of task-irrelevant fear in the attentional blink: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Sun M; Shang C; Jia X; Liu F; Cui L; Wei P; Zhang Q
    Behav Brain Funct; 2022 Dec; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 36517847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motivated suppression of value- and threat-modulated attentional capture.
    Grégoire L; Britton MK; Anderson BA
    Emotion; 2022 Jun; 22(4):780-794. PubMed ID: 32628035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological evidence for attentional capture by irrelevant angry facial expressions: Naturalistic faces.
    Burra N; Coll SY; Barras C; Kerzel D
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Jan; 637():44-49. PubMed ID: 27899310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task-irrelevant angry faces capture attention in visual search while modulated by resources.
    Huang SL; Chang YC; Chen YJ
    Emotion; 2011 Jun; 11(3):544-52. PubMed ID: 21517157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.
    Gaspelin N; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1740-50. PubMed ID: 26420441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of emotional faces: salient physical features guide effective visual search.
    Calvo MG; Nummenmaa L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):471-94. PubMed ID: 18729711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons.
    Gaspelin N; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 27804032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.