These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36862457)

  • 1. Protective factors in the prediction of criminal outcomes for youth with sexual offenses using tools developed for adults and adolescents: Tests of direct effects and moderation of risk.
    Langton CM; Awrey MJ; Worling JR
    Psychol Assess; 2023 Jun; 35(6):497-509. PubMed ID: 36862457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing protective factors of youth who sexually offended in singapore: preliminary evidence on the utility of the DASH-13 and the SAPROF.
    Zeng G; Chu CM; Lee Y
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):91-108. PubMed ID: 25527632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attending to the Positive: A Retrospective Validation of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors-Sexual Offence Version.
    Nolan T; Willis GM; Thornton D; Kelley SM; Christofferson SB
    Sex Abuse; 2023 Mar; 35(2):241-260. PubMed ID: 35507760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective investigation of factors that predict desistance from recidivism for adolescents who have sexually offended.
    Worling JR; Langton CM
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):127-42. PubMed ID: 25201880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Promotive, Mixed, and Risk Effects of Individual Items Comprising the SAPROF Assessment Tool With Justice-Involved Youth.
    Langton CM; Betteridge M; Worling JR
    Assessment; 2024 Mar; 31(2):418-430. PubMed ID: 37038332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic Protective Factors Relevant to Sexual Offending.
    Thornton D; Willis GM; Kelley S
    Curr Psychiatry Rep; 2024 Apr; 26(4):142-150. PubMed ID: 38396235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk Assessment in Juvenile and Young Adult Offenders: Predictive Validity of the SAVRY and SAPROF-YV.
    Kleeven ATH; de Vries Robbé M; Mulder EA; Popma A
    Assessment; 2022 Mar; 29(2):181-197. PubMed ID: 32964720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protective factors and recidivism in accused juveniles who sexually offended.
    Klein V; Rettenberger M; Yoon D; Köhler N; Briken P
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):71-90. PubMed ID: 25351199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A field study of acute dynamic risk assessment in individuals convicted of sexual offenses.
    Nitsche K; Etzler S; Balas J; Eher R; Rettenberger M
    Psychol Assess; 2022 Jun; 34(6):583-594. PubMed ID: 35298221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the predictive accuracy of structured and unstructured risk assessment methods for the prediction of recidivism in individuals convicted of sexual and violent offense.
    Wertz M; Schobel S; Schiltz K; Rettenberger M
    Psychol Assess; 2023 Feb; 35(2):152-164. PubMed ID: 36455027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending with the SAPROF.
    de Vries Robbé M; de Vogel V; Koster K; Bogaerts S
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 25210106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and Reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Youth Sexual Offense Version.
    Rojas EY; Olver ME
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Oct; 32(7):826-849. PubMed ID: 31248327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A meta-analysis of trends in general, sexual, and violent recidivism among youth with histories of sex offending.
    Lussier P; McCuish E; Chouinard Thivierge S; Frechette J
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2024 Jan; 25(1):54-72. PubMed ID: 36594653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An exploration of protective factors supporting desistance from sexual offending.
    de Vries Robbé M; Mann RE; Maruna S; Thornton D
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):16-33. PubMed ID: 25143436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors Predicting Desistance From Reoffending: A Validation Study of the SAPROF in Sexual Offenders.
    Yoon D; Turner D; Klein V; Rettenberger M; Eher R; Briken P
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Feb; 62(3):697-716. PubMed ID: 27531703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Impact of Using Documented but Uncharged Offense Data on JSORRAT-II Predictive Validity.
    Ralston CA; Sarkar A; Philipp GT; Epperson DL
    Sex Abuse; 2017 Mar; 29(2):186-202. PubMed ID: 25896905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-Validation of the JSORRAT-II in Iowa.
    Ralston CA; Epperson DL; Edwards SR
    Sex Abuse; 2016 Sep; 28(6):534-54. PubMed ID: 25179400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing the validity of criminal risk assessment tools in sexually abusive youth.
    Barra S; Bessler C; Landolt MA; Aebi M
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Nov; 30(11):1430-1443. PubMed ID: 29792506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF): A meta-analysis of its predictive and incremental validity.
    Burghart M; de Ruiter C; Hynes SE; Krishnan N; Levtova Y; Uyar A
    Psychol Assess; 2023 Jan; 35(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 36227302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protective strengths, risk, and recidivism in a sample of known sexual offenders.
    Miller HA
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):34-50. PubMed ID: 25567534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.