These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36862457)

  • 21. Scientific Evolution of Clinical and Risk Assessment of Sexually Abusive Youth: A Comprehensive Review of Empirical Tools.
    Miccio-Fonseca LC; Rasmussen LAL
    J Child Sex Abus; 2018; 27(8):871-900. PubMed ID: 30388940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does Treatment for Sexual Offending Work?
    Tyler N; Gannon TA; Olver ME
    Curr Psychiatry Rep; 2021 Jul; 23(8):51. PubMed ID: 34196839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A field study of acute dynamic risk assessment in individuals convicted of sexual offenses.
    Nitsche K; Etzler S; Balas J; Eher R; Rettenberger M
    Psychol Assess; 2022 Jun; 34(6):583-594. PubMed ID: 35298221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An examination of latent constructs of dynamic sexual violence risk and need as a function of indigenous and nonindigenous ancestry.
    Olver ME; Kingston DA; Sowden JN
    Psychol Serv; 2021 Nov; 18(4):484-496. PubMed ID: 31999157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Protective factors and recidivism in accused juveniles who sexually offended.
    Klein V; Rettenberger M; Yoon D; Köhler N; Briken P
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):71-90. PubMed ID: 25351199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The predictive properties of dynamic sex offender risk assessment instruments: A meta-analysis.
    van den Berg JW; Smid W; Schepers K; Wever E; van Beek D; Janssen E; Gijs L
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Feb; 30(2):179-191. PubMed ID: 28368169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predictive Properties of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offense Version as a Function of Age.
    Olver ME; Beggs Christofferson SM; Nicholaichuk TP; Wong SCP
    Assessment; 2021 Sep; 28(6):1671-1693. PubMed ID: 32336112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Juvenile Sex Offending Through a Developmental Life Course Criminology Perspective.
    Lussier P
    Sex Abuse; 2017 Feb; 29(1):51-80. PubMed ID: 25896906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dynamic Risk Assessment of Sexual Offenders: Validity and Dimensional Structure of the Stable-2007.
    Etzler S; Eher R; Rettenberger M
    Assessment; 2020 Jun; 27(4):822-839. PubMed ID: 29405755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Updating Probability in Sex Offender Risk Assessment.
    Elwood RW
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 May; 62(7):2063-2080. PubMed ID: 28592163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The development of the crime scene behavior risk measure for sexual offense recidivism.
    Dahle KP; Biedermann J; Lehmann RJ; Gallasch-Nemitz F
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Dec; 38(6):569-79. PubMed ID: 24707910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Desistance From Sexual Offending.
    Harris DA
    Curr Psychiatry Rep; 2021 Jan; 23(2):7. PubMed ID: 33404825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting sexual and nonsexual recidivism in a consecutive sample of juveniles convicted of sexual offences.
    Aebi M; Plattner B; Steinhausen HC; Bessler C
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Dec; 23(4):456-73. PubMed ID: 21406605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Static-99R Is Not Valid For Women: Predictive Validity in 739 Females Who Have Sexually Offended.
    Marshall E; Miller HA; Cortoni F; Helmus LM
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Sep; 33(6):631-653. PubMed ID: 32659180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: revised age weights.
    Helmus L; Thornton D; Hanson RK; Babchishin KM
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Feb; 24(1):64-101. PubMed ID: 21844404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High-risk sex offenders may not be high risk forever.
    Hanson RK; Harris AJ; Helmus L; Thornton D
    J Interpers Violence; 2014 Oct; 29(15):2792-813. PubMed ID: 24664250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Role of Family Support in the Explanation of Patterns of Desistance Among Individuals Convicted of a Sexual Offense.
    Walker A; Kazemian L; Lussier P; Na C
    J Interpers Violence; 2020 Sep; 35(17-18):3643-3665. PubMed ID: 29294774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending with the SAPROF.
    de Vries Robbé M; de Vogel V; Koster K; Bogaerts S
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 25210106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The predictive validity of common risk assessment tools in men with intellectual disabilities and problematic sexual behaviors.
    Fedoroff JP; Richards D; Ranger R; Curry S
    Res Dev Disabil; 2016 Oct; 57():29-38. PubMed ID: 27372881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Visual Reaction Time™ as a predictor of sexual offense recidivism.
    Gray SR; Abel GG; Jordan A; Garby T; Wiegel M; Harlow N
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Apr; 27(2):173-88. PubMed ID: 24058094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.