These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36862490)
1. The wisdom of many in few: Finding individuals who are as wise as the crowd. Himmelstein M; Budescu DV; Ho EH J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 May; 152(5):1223-1244. PubMed ID: 36862490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Premature predictions: Accurate forecasters are not viewed as more competent for earlier predictions. Mislavsky R; Gaertig C J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jan; 153(1):159-170. PubMed ID: 37870813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of Choice Restriction on Accuracy and User Experience in an Internet-Based Geopolitical Forecasting Task. Widmer CL; Summerville A; Juvina I; Minnery BS Front Psychol; 2021; 12():662279. PubMed ID: 34335374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using meta-predictions to identify experts in the crowd when past performance is unknown. Martinie M; Wilkening T; Howe PDL PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232058. PubMed ID: 32330175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motivated underpinnings of the impact bias in affective forecasts. Morewedge CK; Buechel EC Emotion; 2013 Dec; 13(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 23914762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Compromising improves forecasting. Ferreiro DN; Deroy O; Bahrami B R Soc Open Sci; 2023 May; 10(5):221216. PubMed ID: 37206966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying machine influence over human forecasters. Abeliuk A; Benjamin DM; Morstatter F; Galstyan A Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15940. PubMed ID: 32994447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament. Mellers B; Ungar L; Baron J; Ramos J; Gurcay B; Fincher K; Scott SE; Moore D; Atanasov P; Swift SA; Murray T; Stone E; Tetlock PE Psychol Sci; 2014 May; 25(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 24659192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marine Forecasting and Fishing Safety: Improving the Fit between Forecasts and Harvester Needs. Finnis J; Shewmake JW; Neis B; Telford D J Agromedicine; 2019 Oct; 24(4):324-332. PubMed ID: 31293225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact bias or underestimation? Outcome specifications predict the direction of affective forecasting errors. Buechel EC; Zhang J; Morewedge CK J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 May; 146(5):746-761. PubMed ID: 28368193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using prediction polling to harness collective intelligence for disease forecasting. Sell TK; Warmbrod KL; Watson C; Trotochaud M; Martin E; Ravi SJ; Balick M; Servan-Schreiber E BMC Public Health; 2021 Nov; 21(1):2132. PubMed ID: 34801014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From discipline-centered rivalries to solution-centered science: Producing better probability estimates for policy makers. Mellers BA; Tetlock PE Am Psychol; 2019 Apr; 74(3):290-300. PubMed ID: 30945892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine learning augmentation reduces prediction error in collective forecasting: development and validation across prediction markets with application to COVID events. Gruen A; Mattingly KR; Morwitch E; Bossaerts F; Clifford M; Nash C; Ioannidis JPA; Ponsonby AL EBioMedicine; 2023 Oct; 96():104783. PubMed ID: 37708701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]